Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):523-531. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
Careful assessment of the reasons for discontinuation of active surveillance (AS) is required for men with prostate cancer (PCa).
Using Movember's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance initiative (GAP3) database, we report on reasons for AS discontinuation.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We compared data from 10296 men on AS from 21 centres across 12 countries.
Cumulative incidence methods were used to estimate the cumulative incidence rates of AS discontinuation.
During 5-yr follow-up, 27.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.4-28.6%) men showed signs of disease progression, 12.8% (95% CI: 12.0-13.6%) converted to active treatment without evidence of progression, 1.7% (95% CI: 1.5-2.0%) continued to watchful waiting, and 1.7% (95% CI: 1.4-2.1%) died from other causes. Of the 7049 men who remained on AS, 2339 had follow-up for >5yr, 4561 had follow-up for <5yr, and 149 were lost to follow-up. Cumulative incidence of progression was 27.5% (95% CI: 26.4-28.6%) at 5yr and 38.2% (95% CI: 36.7-39.9%) at 10yr. A limitation is that not all centres were included due to limited information on the reason for discontinuation and limited follow-up.
Our descriptive analyses of current AS practices worldwide showed that 43.6% of men drop out of AS during 5-yr follow-up, mainly due to signs of disease progression. Improvements in selection tools for AS are thus needed to correctly allocate men with PCa to AS, which will also reduce discontinuation due to conversion to active treatment without evidence of disease progression.
Our assessment of a worldwide database of men with prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS) shows that 43.6% drop out of AS within 5yr, mainly due to signs of disease progression. Better tools are needed to select and monitor men with PCa as part of AS.
需要仔细评估前列腺癌(PCa)患者主动监测(AS)停止的原因。
利用 Movember 的全球行动计划前列腺癌主动监测倡议(GAP3)数据库,我们报告 AS 停止的原因。
设计、设置和参与者:我们比较了来自 12 个国家 21 个中心的 10296 名 AS 男性的数据。
使用累积发生率方法估计 AS 停止的累积发生率。
在 5 年的随访中,27.5%(95%置信区间[CI]:26.4-28.6%)的男性出现疾病进展迹象,12.8%(95%CI:12.0-13.6%)转为无进展证据的主动治疗,1.7%(95%CI:1.5-2.0%)继续观察等待,1.7%(95%CI:1.4-2.1%)死于其他原因。在 7049 名继续接受 AS 治疗的男性中,2339 名随访时间>5 年,4561 名随访时间<5 年,149 名失访。5 年时进展的累积发生率为 27.5%(95%CI:26.4-28.6%),10 年时为 38.2%(95%CI:36.7-39.9%)。一个局限性是,由于停止的原因和随访时间有限,并非所有中心都包括在内。
我们对全球当前 AS 实践的描述性分析表明,43.6%的男性在 5 年随访期间退出 AS,主要原因是疾病进展的迹象。因此,需要改进 AS 的选择工具,以便正确将前列腺癌男性分配到 AS,这也将减少因无疾病进展证据而转为主动治疗而导致的退出。
我们对全球前列腺癌主动监测男性数据库的评估显示,43.6%的男性在 5 年内退出 AS,主要原因是疾病进展的迹象。需要更好的工具来选择和监测接受 AS 的男性。