Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jun;32(4):e2576. doi: 10.1002/eap.2576. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
Biodiversity-benefits of organic farming have mostly been documented at the field scale. However, these benefits from organic farming to species diversity may not propagate to larger scales because variation in the management of different crop types and seminatural habitats in conventional farms might allow species to cope with intensive crop management. We studied flowering plant communities using a spatially replicated design in different habitats (cereal, ley and seminatural grasslands) in organic and conventional farms, distributed along a gradient in proportion of seminatural grasslands. We developed a novel method to compare the rates of species turnover within and between habitats, and between the total species pools in the two farming systems. We found that the intrahabitat species turnover did not differ between organic and conventional farms, but that organic farms had a significantly higher interhabitat turnover of flowering plant species compared with conventional ones. This was mainly driven by herbicide-sensitive species in cereal fields in organic farms, as these contained 2.5 times more species exclusive to cereal fields compared with conventional farms. The farm-scale species richness of flowering plants was higher in organic compared with conventional farms, but only in simple landscapes. At the interfarm level, we found that 36% of species were shared between the two farming systems, 37% were specific to organic farms whereas 27% were specific to conventional ones. Therefore, our results suggest that that both community nestedness and species turnover drive changes in species composition between the two farming systems. These large-scale shifts in species composition were driven by both species-specific herbicide and nitrogen sensitivity of plants. Our study demonstrates that organic farming should foster a diversity of flowering plant species from local to landscape scales, by promoting unique sets of arable-adapted species that are scarce in conventional systems. In terms of biodiversity conservation, our results call for promoting organic farming over large spatial extents, especially in simple landscapes, where such transitions would benefit plant diversity most.
有机农业的生物多样性效益大多在田间尺度上得到证实。然而,有机农业对物种多样性的这些益处可能不会扩展到更大的尺度,因为常规农场中不同作物类型和半自然栖息地管理的变化可能使物种能够适应集约化的作物管理。我们使用空间复制设计,在有机和常规农场的不同栖息地(谷物、牧草和半自然草地)中研究开花植物群落,这些栖息地沿半自然草地比例的梯度分布。我们开发了一种新的方法来比较两种农业系统中栖息地内和栖息地间以及总物种库内的物种周转率。我们发现,有机和常规农场之间的栖息地内物种周转率没有差异,但与常规农场相比,有机农场的开花植物种间周转率明显更高。这主要是由于有机农场谷物田中的除草剂敏感物种造成的,因为这些物种比常规农场的谷物田多 2.5 倍。与常规农场相比,有机农场的开花植物种丰富度更高,但仅在简单景观中如此。在农场间水平上,我们发现两种农业系统之间有 36%的物种共享,37%的物种是有机农场特有的,而 27%的物种是常规农场特有的。因此,我们的研究结果表明,群落嵌套性和物种周转率共同驱动两种农业系统之间物种组成的变化。这些物种组成的大规模变化是由植物对除草剂和氮的特异性敏感性驱动的。我们的研究表明,有机农业通过促进常规系统中稀缺的独特的适应作物的物种,应该在从局部到景观尺度上促进开花植物物种的多样性。从生物多样性保护的角度来看,我们的研究结果呼吁在大的空间范围内推广有机农业,特别是在简单的景观中,这种转变将使植物多样性受益最大。