Stroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
St George's National Health Service Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom.
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):720-727. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.5153.
Blood pressure (BP) lowering is considered neuroprotective in patients with cerebral small vessel disease; however, more intensive regimens may increase cerebral hypoperfusion. This study examined the effect of standard vs intensive BP treatment on cerebral perfusion in patients with severe small vessel disease.
To investigate whether standard vs intensive BP lowering over 3 months causes decreased cerebral perfusion in small vessel disease.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial took place at 2 English university medical centers. Patients were randomized via a central online system (in a 1:1 ratio). Seventy patients with hypertension and with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed symptomatic lacunar infarct and confluent white matter hyperintensities were recruited between February 29, 2012, and October 21, 2015, and randomized (36 in the standard group and 34 in the intensive group). Analyzable data were available in 62 patients, 33 in the standard group and 29 in the intensive group, for intent-to-treat analysis. This experiment examines the 3-month follow-up period.
Patients were randomized to standard (systolic, 130-140 mm Hg) or intensive (systolic, <125 mm Hg) BP targets, to be achieved through medication changes.
Cerebral perfusion was measured using arterial spin labeling; the primary end point was change in global perfusion between baseline and 3 months, compared between treatment groups by analysis of variance. Linear regression compared change in perfusion against change in BP. Magnetic resonance imaging scan analysis was masked to treatment group.
Among 62 analyzable patients, the mean age was 69.3 years, and 60% (n = 37) were male. The mean (SD) systolic BP decreased by 8 (12) mm Hg in the standard group and by 27 (17) mm Hg in the intensive group (P < .001), with mean (SD) achieved pressures of 141 (13) and 126 (10) mm Hg, respectively. Change in global perfusion did not differ between treatment groups: the mean (SD) change was -0.5 (9.4) mL/min/100 g in the standard group vs 0.7 (8.6) mL/min/100 g in the intensive group (partial η2, 0.004; 95% CI, -3.551 to 5.818; P = .63). No differences were observed when the analysis examined gray or white matter only or was confined to those achieving target BP. The number of adverse events did not differ between treatment groups, with a mean (SD) of 0.21 (0.65) for the standard group and 0.32 (0.75) for the intensive group (P = .44).
Intensive BP lowering did not reduce cerebral perfusion in severe small vessel disease.
isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN37694103.
在患有脑小血管疾病的患者中,降低血压(BP)被认为具有神经保护作用;然而,更强化的治疗方案可能会增加脑灌注不足。本研究旨在探讨标准治疗与强化治疗对严重小血管疾病患者脑灌注的影响。
研究标准治疗与强化降压治疗在 3 个月内是否会导致小血管疾病患者脑灌注减少。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在英国 2 所大学医学中心进行的随机临床试验。通过中央在线系统(1:1 比例)进行随机分组。2012 年 2 月 29 日至 2015 年 10 月 21 日,共招募了 70 名患有高血压和磁共振成像证实的症状性腔隙性梗死和融合性脑白质高信号的患者,并进行了随机分组(标准组 36 例,强化组 34 例)。共有 62 名患者(标准组 33 名,强化组 29 名)进行了意向治疗分析,可分析的数据。本实验考察了 3 个月的随访期。
患者被随机分配到标准(收缩压 130-140mmHg)或强化(收缩压<125mmHg)血压目标,通过药物调整来实现。
采用动脉自旋标记法测量脑灌注;主要终点为与基线相比,3 个月时的整体灌注变化,通过方差分析比较治疗组之间的差异。线性回归比较灌注变化与血压变化的关系。磁共振成像扫描分析对治疗组进行了盲法。
在 62 名可分析的患者中,平均年龄为 69.3 岁,60%(n=37)为男性。标准组的收缩压平均下降 8(12)mmHg,强化组下降 27(17)mmHg(P<0.001),两组的平均(标准差)血压分别为 141(13)和 126(10)mmHg。治疗组之间的整体灌注变化无差异:标准组的平均(标准差)变化为-0.5(9.4)mL/min/100g,强化组为 0.7(8.6)mL/min/100g(部分η2,0.004;95%置信区间,-3.551 至 5.818;P=0.63)。当分析仅检查灰质或白质或仅限于达到目标血压的患者时,没有观察到差异。两组不良事件的数量没有差异,标准组平均(标准差)为 0.21(0.65),强化组为 0.32(0.75)(P=0.44)。
强化降压治疗并未降低严重小血管疾病患者的脑灌注。
isrctn.org 标识符:ISRCTN37694103。