Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):1556-1566. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac052.
The aim of this study was to compare Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) telephone-delivered coaching with standard quitline (QL) telephone-delivered coaching.
Medicare/uninsured adults (analyzable sample N = 1170) who smoked at least 10 cigarettes per day were recruited from Optum, a major US provider of QL services, in a two-arm stratified double-blind randomized trial with main outcome of self-reported missing = smoking 30-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at the 12-month follow-up. Participants were mean (SD) age 47.4 (12.7), 61% female, and 72% white race. Five sessions of telephone-delivered ACT or QL interventions were offered. Both arms included combined nicotine patch (4 weeks) and gum or lozenge (2 weeks).
The 12-month follow-up data retention rate was 67.8%. ACT participants reported their treatment was more useful for quitting smoking (92.0% for ACT vs. 82.3% for QL; odds ratio [OR] = 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53 to 4.00). Both arms had similar 12-month cessation outcomes (missing = smoking 30-day PPA: 24.6% for ACT vs. 28.8% for QL; OR =.81; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.05) and the ACT arm trended toward greater reductions in number cigarettes smoked per day (-5.6 for ACT vs. -1.7 QL, among smokers; p = .075).
ACT telephone-delivered coaching was more satisfying, engaging, and was as effective as standard QL telephone-delivered coaching. ACT may help those who fail to quit after standard coaching or who choose not to use nicotine replacement therapy.
In a sample of Medicare and uninsured QL callers, a large randomized trial with long-term follow-up showed that ACT) telephone-delivered coaching was more satisfying, engaging, and was as effective as standard QL telephone-delivered coaching-which has followed the same behavior change approach since the 1990s. This newer model of coaching might be a welcome addition to QL services.
本研究旨在比较接受和承诺疗法(ACT)电话辅导与标准戒烟热线(QL)电话辅导。
从美国主要的 QL 服务提供商 Optum 招募了至少每天吸 10 支香烟的医疗保险/无保险成年人(可分析样本 N=1170),在一项为期 12 个月的随访中,主要结局为自我报告的未报告=吸烟 30 天点流行率戒烟(PPA)。参与者的平均(SD)年龄为 47.4(12.7),61%为女性,72%为白种人。提供了五节电话传递的 ACT 或 QL 干预。两个组都包括联合尼古丁贴片(4 周)和口香糖或锭剂(2 周)。
12 个月随访数据保留率为 67.8%。ACT 参与者报告他们的治疗对戒烟更有用(ACT 为 92.0%,QL 为 82.3%;优势比[OR] = 2.48;95%置信区间[CI]:1.53 至 4.00)。两组在 12 个月的戒烟结果相似(未报告=吸烟 30 天 PPA:ACT 为 24.6%,QL 为 28.8%;OR=.81;95%CI:0.62 至 1.05),ACT 组吸烟量减少的趋势更为明显(吸烟者 ACT 为-5.6,QL 为-1.7,p=0.075)。
ACT 电话辅导更令人满意、吸引人,与标准 QL 电话辅导一样有效。ACT 可能有助于那些在标准辅导后未能戒烟的人,或者那些选择不使用尼古丁替代疗法的人。
在一项医疗保险和无保险的 QL 呼叫者样本中,一项具有长期随访的大型随机试验表明,ACT)电话辅导更令人满意、吸引人,与自 20 世纪 90 年代以来采用相同行为改变方法的标准 QL 电话辅导一样有效。这种较新的辅导模式可能是 QL 服务的一个受欢迎的补充。