Suppr超能文献

生物剂量测定法与物理剂量测定技术在应急剂量测定中可能的分流应用的比较验证。

A comparative validation of biodosimetry and physical dosimetry techniques for possible triage applications in emergency dosimetry.

作者信息

Sholom Sergey, McKeever Stephen W S, Escalona Maria B, Ryan Terri L, Balajee Adayabalam S

机构信息

Radiation Dosimetry Laboratory, Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States of America.

Cytogenetic Biodosimetry Laboratory, Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, United States of America.

出版信息

J Radiol Prot. 2022 Mar 22;42(2). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac5815.

Abstract

Large-scale radiological accidents or nuclear terrorist incidents involving radiological or nuclear materials can potentially expose thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of people to unknown radiation doses, requiring prompt dose reconstruction for appropriate triage. Two types of dosimetry methods namely, biodosimetry and physical dosimetry are currently utilized for estimating absorbed radiation dose in humans. Both methods have been tested separately in several inter-laboratory comparison exercises, but a direct comparison of physical dosimetry with biological dosimetry has not been performed to evaluate their dose prediction accuracies. The current work describes the results of the direct comparison of absorbed doses estimated by physical (smartphone components) and biodosimetry (dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) performed in human peripheral blood lymphocytes) methods. For comparison, human peripheral blood samples (biodosimetry) and different components of smartphones, namely surface mount resistors (SMRs), inductors and protective glasses (physical dosimetry) were exposed to different doses of photons (0-4.4 Gy; values refer to dose to blood after correction) and the absorbed radiation doses were reconstructed by biodosimetry (DCA) and physical dosimetry (optically stimulated luminescence (OSL)) methods. Additionally, LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) chips and AlO:C (Luxel) films were used as reference TL and OSL dosimeters, respectively. The best coincidence between biodosimetry and physical dosimetry was observed for samples of blood and SMRs exposed to-rays. Significant differences were observed in the reconstructed doses by the two dosimetry methods for samples exposed to x-ray photons with energy below 100 keV. The discrepancy is probably due to the energy dependence of mass energy-absorption coefficients of the samples extracted from the phones. Our results of comparative validation of the radiation doses reconstructed by luminescence dosimetry from smartphone components with biodosimetry using DCA from human blood suggest the potential use of smartphone components as an effective emergency triage tool for high photon energies.

摘要

涉及放射性或核材料的大规模放射事故或核恐怖事件可能使成千上万甚至数十万的人受到未知辐射剂量的照射,这就需要迅速进行剂量重建以便进行适当的伤员分类。目前有两种剂量测定方法,即生物剂量测定法和物理剂量测定法,用于估算人体吸收的辐射剂量。这两种方法都已在多次实验室间比较试验中分别进行了测试,但尚未对物理剂量测定法和生物剂量测定法进行直接比较以评估它们的剂量预测准确性。当前的研究描述了通过物理方法(智能手机组件)和生物剂量测定法(在人外周血淋巴细胞中进行的双着丝粒染色体分析(DCA))估算的吸收剂量的直接比较结果。为了进行比较,将人外周血样本(生物剂量测定法)和智能手机的不同组件,即表面贴装电阻器(SMR)、电感器和防护玻璃(物理剂量测定法)暴露于不同剂量的光子(0 - 4.4 Gy;数值指校正后血液所受剂量),并通过生物剂量测定法(DCA)和物理剂量测定法(光激发发光(OSL))重建吸收的辐射剂量。此外,分别使用LiF:Mg,Ti(TLD - 100)芯片和AlO:C(Luxel)薄膜作为参考热释光和光激发发光剂量计。对于暴露于γ射线的血液和SMR样本,观察到生物剂量测定法和物理剂量测定法之间的最佳一致性。对于暴露于能量低于100 keV的X射线光子的样本,两种剂量测定方法重建的剂量存在显著差异。这种差异可能是由于从手机中提取的样本的质能吸收系数的能量依赖性所致。我们使用人血的DCA进行生物剂量测定法与使用智能手机组件的发光剂量测定法重建的辐射剂量的比较验证结果表明,智能手机组件有可能作为高光子能量下有效的应急伤员分类工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验