Wilkins Ruth C, Romm Horst, Oestreicher Ursula, Marro Leonora, Yoshida Mitsuaki A, Suto Y, Prasanna Pataje G S
Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada.
Radiat Meas. 2011 Sep 1;46(9):923-928. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.03.012.
Biological dosimetry is an essential tool for estimating radiation doses received to personnel when physical dosimetry is not available or inadequate. The current preferred biodosimetry method is based on the measurement of radiation-specific dicentric chromosomes in exposed individuals' peripheral blood lymphocytes. However, this method is labour-, time- and expertise-demanding. Consequently, for mass casualty applications, strategies have been developed to increase its throughput. One such strategy is to develop validated cytogenetic biodosimetry laboratory networks, both national and international. In a previous study, the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) was validated in our cytogenetic biodosimetry network involving five geographically dispersed laboratories. A complementary strategy to further enhance the throughput of the DCA among inter-laboratory networks is to use a triage DCA where dose assessments are made by truncating the labour-demanding and time-consuming metaphase-spread analysis to 20 to 50 metaphase spreads instead of routine 500 to 1000 metaphase spread analysis. Our laboratory network also validated this triage DCA, however, these dose estimates were made using calibration curves generated in each laboratory from the blood samples irradiated in a single laboratory. In an emergency situation, dose estimates made using pre-existing calibration curves which may vary according to radiation type and dose rate and therefore influence the assessed dose. Here, we analyze the effect of using a pre-existing calibration curve on assessed dose among our network laboratories. The dose estimates were made by analyzing 1000 metaphase spreads as well as triage quality scoring and compared to actual physical doses applied to the samples for validation. The dose estimates in the laboratory partners were in good agreement with the applied physical doses and determined to be adequate for guidance in the treatment of acute radiation syndrome.
生物剂量测定是在无法获得物理剂量测定或其不充分时估算人员所受辐射剂量的重要工具。当前首选的生物剂量测定方法是基于对受照个体外周血淋巴细胞中辐射特异性双着丝粒染色体的测量。然而,该方法需要耗费人力、时间且对专业知识要求较高。因此,针对大规模伤亡情况,已制定了提高其通量的策略。其中一种策略是建立经过验证的细胞遗传学生物剂量测定实验室网络,包括国内和国际网络。在先前的一项研究中,双着丝粒染色体分析(DCA)在我们涉及五个地理位置分散的实验室的细胞遗传学生物剂量测定网络中得到了验证。在实验室间网络中进一步提高DCA通量的一种补充策略是使用分诊DCA,即通过将耗时且费力的中期分裂相分析截断至20至50个中期分裂相来进行剂量评估,而不是常规的500至1000个中期分裂相分析。我们的实验室网络也验证了这种分诊DCA,然而,这些剂量估计是使用每个实验室从在单个实验室中辐照的血样生成的校准曲线做出的。在紧急情况下,使用预先存在的校准曲线做出的剂量估计可能会因辐射类型和剂量率而异,从而影响评估剂量。在此,我们分析了在我们的网络实验室中使用预先存在的校准曲线对评估剂量的影响。通过分析1000个中期分裂相以及分诊质量评分来进行剂量估计,并与施加到样本上的实际物理剂量进行比较以进行验证。实验室合作伙伴的剂量估计与施加的物理剂量高度一致,并被确定足以指导急性放射综合征的治疗。