Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginiagrid.412587.dgrid.27755.32 School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases & International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginiagrid.412587.dgrid.27755.32 School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0256021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02560-21.
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an unprecedented event requiring frequent adaptation to changing clinical circumstances. Convalescent immune plasma (CIP) is a promising treatment that can be mobilized rapidly in a pandemic setting. We tested whether administration of SARS-CoV-2 CIP at hospital admission could reduce the rate of ICU transfer or 28-day mortality or alter levels of specific antibody responses before and after CIP infusion. In a single-arm phase II study, patients >18 years-old with respiratory symptoms with confirmed COVID-19 infection who were admitted to a non-ICU bed were administered two units of CIP within 72 h of admission. Levels of SARS-CoV-2 detected by PCR in the respiratory tract and circulating anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers were sequentially measured before and after CIP transfusion. Twenty-nine patients were transfused high titer CIP and 48 contemporaneous comparable controls were identified. All classes of antibodies to the three SARS-CoV-2 target proteins were significantly increased at days 7 and 14 post-transfusion compared with baseline ( < 0.01). Anti-nucleocapsid IgA levels were reduced at day 28, suggesting that the initial rise may have been due to the contribution of CIP. The groups were well-balanced, without statistically significant differences in demographics or co-morbidities or use of remdesivir or dexamethasone. In participants transfused with CIP, the rate of ICU transfer was 13.8% compared to 27.1% for controls with a hazard ratio 0.506 (95% CI 0.165-1.554), and 28-day mortality was 6.9% compared to 10.4% for controls, hazard ratio 0.640 (95% CI 0.124-3.298). Transfusion of high-titer CIP to non-critically ill patients early after admission with COVID-19 respiratory disease was associated with significantly increased anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies (compared to baseline) and a non-significant reduction in ICU transfer and death (compared to controls). This prospective phase II trial provides a suggestion that the antiviral effects of CIP from early in the COVID-19 pandemic may delay progression to critical illness and death in specific patient populations. This study informs the optimal timing and potential population of use for CIP in COVID-19, particularly in settings without access to other interventions, or in planning for future coronavirus pandemics.
由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2)引起的 COVID-19 大流行是一个前所未有的事件,需要频繁适应不断变化的临床情况。恢复期免疫血浆 (CIP) 是一种有前途的治疗方法,可以在大流行环境中迅速动员。我们测试了在入院时给予 SARS-CoV-2 CIP 是否可以降低 ICU 转移率或 28 天死亡率,或者改变 CIP 输注前后特定抗体反应的水平。在一项单臂 II 期研究中,我们将年龄大于 18 岁、有呼吸道症状且确诊为 COVID-19 感染的患者纳入研究,这些患者在入院后 72 小时内接受了两单位的 CIP。在 CIP 输注前后,我们连续测量呼吸道中 SARS-CoV-2 的 PCR 检测水平和循环抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体滴度。29 名患者输注了高滴度 CIP,同时选择了 48 名具有可比性的对照。与基线相比( < 0.01),CIP 输注后第 7 天和第 14 天所有三种 SARS-CoV-2 靶蛋白的抗体类别均显著增加。抗核衣壳 IgA 水平在第 28 天下降,这表明最初的升高可能是由于 CIP 的贡献。两组在人口统计学、合并症、瑞德西韦或地塞米松的使用方面没有统计学差异。在输注 CIP 的参与者中,ICU 转移率为 13.8%,而对照组为 27.1%,危险比为 0.506(95%CI 0.165-1.554),28 天死亡率为 6.9%,而对照组为 10.4%,危险比为 0.640(95%CI 0.124-3.298)。在 COVID-19 呼吸道疾病入院后早期给予非危重症患者高滴度 CIP 与 SARS-CoV-2 特异性抗体显著增加(与基线相比)以及 ICU 转移和死亡减少(与对照组相比)相关。这项前瞻性 II 期试验表明,COVID-19 大流行早期 CIP 的抗病毒作用可能会延迟特定患者人群向危重症和死亡的进展。这项研究为 CIP 在 COVID-19 中的最佳时机和潜在人群提供了信息,特别是在没有其他干预措施的情况下,或者在为未来的冠状病毒大流行做计划时。