Antonisamy Nikita, Reddy Nallamilli Sujatha, Chinta Parimala, Waanbah Batiston Decruse, Samadhiya Richa, Aleyamma T K, Antonisamy Belavendra, Kamath Mohan S
Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Manda Clinic, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021 Oct-Dec;14(4):386-391. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_92_21. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
Women with abnormal hysterosalpingography (HSG) are anxious regarding the presence of tubal pathology. It is important to know the predictive value of HSG and the need for subsequent laparoscopy following an abnormal report. In the era of assisted reproductive technology, the role of invasive testing such as diagnostic laparoscopy is being increasingly questioned due to its invasiveness and associated risks. There is a need to explore the positive predictive value (PPV) of HSG in detecting bilateral tubal block in our population as PPV changes with the prevalence of disease.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HSG in identifying tubal blockage in subfertile women.
This was a prospective diagnostic study conducted in the department of reproductive medicine and surgery in a university-level hospital.
The study included 199 subfertile women who had undergone HSG earlier and were planned for laparoscopy from April 2017 to January 2021. Findings of HSG and laparoscopy were compared with HSG as index test and laparoscopy as reference test, and the outcomes analysed were PPV of HSG for a bilateral tubal block, bilateral hydrosalpinx, abnormal HSG (unilateral or bilateral tubal block) and agreement between HSG and diagnostic laparoscopy in detecting normal and abnormal findings.
Kappa statistics, Stuart-Maxwell tests of marginal homogeneity and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) statistics were used.
The PPV for a bilateral block with HSG was 20.9% (95% CI: 13.7-29.7). The PPV of HSG for bilateral hydrosalpinx was 50.0% (95% CI: 6.8-93.2). PABAK was estimated to be 0.42 (95% CI: 0.30-0.55), suggestive of moderate agreement between the tests. Findings of laparoscopy in women with at least one patent tube in HSG showed that in 12.3% of cases, the management was likely to change due to the operative findings.
The current study showed low PPV for bilateral tubal block diagnosed with HSG which translates into a need for further confirmation by laparoscopy. In one out of every eight women with at least one patent tube on HSG, performing laparoscopy changed the management.
子宫输卵管造影术(HSG)结果异常的女性会担心输卵管病变的存在。了解HSG的预测价值以及异常报告后是否需要后续进行腹腔镜检查很重要。在辅助生殖技术时代,诸如诊断性腹腔镜检查等侵入性检测因其侵入性和相关风险而受到越来越多的质疑。由于疾病患病率会影响阳性预测值(PPV),因此有必要探索HSG在我国人群中检测双侧输卵管阻塞的PPV。
本研究的目的是评估HSG在识别不孕女性输卵管阻塞方面的诊断准确性。
这是一项在大学附属医院生殖医学与外科进行的前瞻性诊断研究。
该研究纳入了199例曾接受过HSG检查且计划于2017年4月至2021年1月进行腹腔镜检查的不孕女性。将HSG的结果与腹腔镜检查结果进行比较,以HSG作为指标检测,腹腔镜检查作为参考检测,分析的结果包括HSG对双侧输卵管阻塞、双侧输卵管积水、HSG异常(单侧或双侧输卵管阻塞)的PPV,以及HSG与诊断性腹腔镜检查在检测正常和异常结果方面的一致性。
使用Kappa统计量、边际同质性的Stuart-Maxwell检验和患病率调整偏差调整Kappa(PABAK)统计量。
HSG诊断双侧阻塞的PPV为20.9%(95%CI:13.7 - 29.7)。HSG诊断双侧输卵管积水的PPV为50.0%(95%CI:6.8 - 93.2)。估计PABAK为0.42(95%CI:0.30 - 0.55),表明检测之间存在中度一致性。HSG显示至少有一侧输卵管通畅的女性的腹腔镜检查结果表明,在12.3%的病例中,手术结果可能会改变治疗方案。
当前研究表明,HSG诊断双侧输卵管阻塞的PPV较低,这意味着需要通过腹腔镜检查进一步确认。在HSG显示至少有一侧输卵管通畅的每八名女性中,有一名女性进行腹腔镜检查后改变了治疗方案。