Lee Dong Hyuk, Seo Sang Won, Roh Jee Hoon, Oh Minyoung, Oh Jungsu S, Oh Seung Jun, Kim Jae Seung, Jeong Yong
Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.
College of Korean Medicine, Sangji University, Wonju, South Korea.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Feb 7;13:784054. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.784054. eCollection 2021.
The concept of cognitive reserve (CR) has been proposed as a protective factor that modifies the effect of brain pathology on cognitive performance. It has been characterized through CR proxies; however, they have intrinsic limitations. In this study, we utilized two different datasets containing tau, amyloid PET, and T1 magnetic resonance imaging. First, 91 Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum subjects were included from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 3. CR was conceptualized as the residual between actual cognition and estimated cognition based on amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration. The proposed marker was tested by the correlation with CR proxy and modulation of brain pathology effects on cognitive function. Second, longitudinal data of baseline 53 AD spectrum and 34 cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants in the MEMORI dataset were analyzed. CR marker was evaluated for the association with disease conversion rate and clinical progression. Applying our multimodal CR model, this study demonstrates the differential effect of CR on clinical progression according to the disease status and the modulating effect on the relationship between brain pathology and cognition. The proposed marker was associated with years of education and modulated the effect of pathological burden on cognitive performance in the AD spectrum. Longitudinally, higher CR marker was associated with lower disease conversion rate among prodromal AD and CU individuals. Higher CR marker was related to exacerbated cognitive decline in the AD spectrum; however, it was associated with a mitigated decline in CU individuals. These results provide evidence that CR may affect the clinical progression differentially depending on the disease status.
认知储备(CR)的概念已被提出作为一种保护因素,可改变脑病理学对认知表现的影响。它已通过CR替代指标进行了表征;然而,它们存在内在局限性。在本研究中,我们使用了两个包含tau、淀粉样蛋白PET和T1磁共振成像的不同数据集。首先,从阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议3中纳入了91名阿尔茨海默病(AD)连续体受试者。CR被概念化为实际认知与基于淀粉样蛋白、tau和神经退行性变的估计认知之间的残差。通过与CR替代指标的相关性以及对脑病理学对认知功能影响的调节来测试所提出的标志物。其次,分析了MEMORI数据集中53名AD谱系和34名认知未受损(CU)参与者基线的纵向数据。评估CR标志物与疾病转化率和临床进展的关联。应用我们的多模态CR模型,本研究证明了CR根据疾病状态对临床进展的不同影响以及对脑病理学与认知之间关系的调节作用。所提出的标志物与受教育年限相关,并调节了AD谱系中病理负担对认知表现的影响。纵向来看,较高的CR标志物与前驱AD和CU个体中较低的疾病转化率相关。较高的CR标志物与AD谱系中认知衰退加剧相关;然而,它与CU个体中衰退减轻相关。这些结果提供了证据,表明CR可能根据疾病状态对临床进展产生不同影响。