De Backer Maarten, Van Puyenbroeck Stef, Fransen Katrien, Reynders Bart, Boen Filip, Malisse Florian, Vande Broek Gert
Physical Activity, Sports and Health Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 7;12:645764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645764. eCollection 2021.
A vast stream of empirical work has revealed that coach and athlete leadership are important determinants of sport teams' functioning and performance. Although coaches have a direct impact on individual and team outcomes, they should also strive to stimulate athletes to take up leadership roles in a qualitative manner. Yet, the relation between coach leadership behavior and the extent of high-quality athlete leadership within teams remains underexposed. Based on organizational justice theory and the social identity approach, the present research tested whether perceived justice of the coach positively predicts the quality of athlete leadership. Furthermore, we examined the role of group dynamic processes (i.e., team identification and task cohesion) within this relation. Belgian volleyball ( = 161) and basketball players ( = 78) were asked to rate the justice of their coach, their team identification, the task cohesion, and the athlete leadership quality in the team. Structural equation modeling indicated that coaches' perceived justice positively predicted the quality of athletes' leadership, and that this relation was established through three intermediate steps (i.e., from team identification to task cohesion, to athlete leadership quality). These results suggest that fair coach behavior does not only bridge the gap between leadership and followership, it also has the potential to improve the quality of athletes' leadership within sport teams. More specifically, findings suggest that coaches' perceived justice cultivates a shared social identity characterized by high levels of players' identification with their team, which in turn increased their perceptions of the team's task cohesion. Finally, this increased task cohesion encouraged the athlete leaders to demonstrate high-quality leadership.
大量的实证研究表明,教练领导力和运动员领导力是运动队运作和表现的重要决定因素。尽管教练对个人和团队成绩有直接影响,但他们也应努力激励运动员以高质量的方式承担领导角色。然而,教练领导行为与团队中高质量运动员领导力的程度之间的关系仍未得到充分探讨。基于组织公正理论和社会认同方法,本研究检验了教练的公正感是否能正向预测运动员领导力的质量。此外,我们还考察了群体动力过程(即团队认同和任务凝聚力)在这种关系中的作用。研究要求比利时排球运动员((n = 161))和篮球运动员((n = 78))对他们教练的公正感、团队认同、任务凝聚力以及团队中运动员领导力的质量进行评分。结构方程模型表明,教练的公正感能正向预测运动员领导力的质量,并且这种关系是通过三个中间步骤建立起来的(即从团队认同到任务凝聚力,再到运动员领导力质量)。这些结果表明,公平的教练行为不仅缩小了领导与追随之间的差距,还具有提高运动队中运动员领导力质量的潜力。更具体地说,研究结果表明,教练的公正感培养了一种共享的社会认同,其特征是运动员对团队的高度认同,这反过来又增强了他们对团队任务凝聚力的感知。最后,这种增强的任务凝聚力促使运动员领导者展现出高质量的领导力。