Judge Timothy A, Piccolo Ronald F, Ilies Remus
Department of Management, Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Feb;89(1):36-51. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36.
This study provided a meta-analysis of the relationship of the Ohio State leadership behaviors--Consideration and Initiating Structure--with leadership. Overall, 163 independent correlations for Consideration and 159 correlations for Initiating Structure were analyzed. Results revealed that both Consideration (.48) and Initiating Structure (.29) have moderately strong, nonzero relations with leadership outcomes. Consideration was more strongly related to follower satisfaction (leader satisfaction, job satisfaction), motivation, and leader effectiveness, and Initiating Structure was slightly more strongly related to leader job performance and group-organization performance. Validities did vary by leadership measure, but in most cases validities generalized regardless of the measure used. Overall, the results provide important support for the validity of Initiating Structure and Consideration in leadership research.
本研究对俄亥俄州立大学领导行为（关怀和定规）与领导力之间的关系进行了荟萃分析。总体而言，分析了关怀方面的163个独立相关性以及定规方面的159个相关性。结果显示，关怀（0.48）和定规（0.29）与领导结果均存在中等强度的非零关系。关怀与下属满意度（领导满意度、工作满意度）、动机和领导效能的相关性更强，而定规与领导工作绩效和群体组织绩效的相关性略强。效度因领导测量方式而异，但在大多数情况下，无论使用何种测量方式，效度都具有普遍性。总体而言，研究结果为定规和关怀在领导力研究中的效度提供了重要支持。
