Fransen K, Boen F, Vansteenkiste M, Mertens N, Vande Broek G
Department of Kinesiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Psychology, U Gent, Gent, Belgium.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Feb;28(2):725-745. doi: 10.1111/sms.12950. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
Grounded in the Cognitive Evaluation Theory, a mini-theory of Self-Determination Theory, this experimental field study sought to examine the impact of competence support of both coaches and athlete leaders on athletes' competence satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and subjective as well as objective performance. Male basketball players (N = 120) were allocated to groups of 5 players. These groups were then randomly assigned to a control group or to 1 of 3 experimental conditions. In these experimental conditions, either the coach, the athlete leader, or both provided motivational feedback to their team. The provision of motivational feedback by either the coach or the athlete leader was sufficient to increase athletes' competence satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and objective performance (i.e., enhanced execution time without a decrease in scoring percentage) relative to the control group. Interestingly, when both the coach and the athlete leader provided competence support, a surplus effect was observed on objective performance compared with when only the coach provided competence support. Furthermore, structural equation modeling revealed that players' competence satisfaction mediated the relationship between the provided competence support and players' intrinsic motivation, while a direct effect was observed on objective performance. In conclusion, the study findings indicate that also athlete leaders can adopt a motivating role, and that by doing so, their impact is as strong as the impact of the coach. Both coaches and athlete leaders can thus boost athletes' objective performance and foster competence satisfaction, with the latter resulting in increased intrinsic motivation.
基于认知评价理论(自我决定理论的一个子理论),这项实验性实地研究旨在考察教练和运动员领袖的能力支持对运动员能力满意度、内在动机以及主观和客观表现的影响。男性篮球运动员(N = 120)被分成每组5人的小组。然后将这些小组随机分配到一个对照组或三种实验条件之一。在这些实验条件下,要么教练、要么运动员领袖、要么两者都向他们的团队提供激励性反馈。相对于对照组,教练或运动员领袖提供激励性反馈足以提高运动员的能力满意度、内在动机和客观表现(即执行时间缩短且得分率不降低)。有趣的是,当教练和运动员领袖都提供能力支持时,与仅教练提供能力支持相比,客观表现上观察到了一种额外效应。此外,结构方程模型显示,运动员的能力满意度介导了所提供的能力支持与运动员内在动机之间的关系,而对客观表现则观察到了直接效应。总之,研究结果表明运动员领袖也可以发挥激励作用,而且这样做时,他们的影响与教练的影响一样强大。因此,教练和运动员领袖都可以提高运动员的客观表现并促进能力满意度,而后者会导致内在动机增加。