• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健支出与中国的经济增长有关吗? Bootstrap ARDL 方法。

Are Healthcare Expenditures Related to Economic Growth in China? Bootstrap ARDL Approach.

机构信息

Department of Leisure and Recreation Management, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Finance, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 7;9:766091. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.766091. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.766091
PMID:35198529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8858849/
Abstract

This study attempts to investigate whether healthcare expenditures (HCE) are related to economic growth in China using a newly developed Bootstrap autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) test for China over the period of 1990-2019. To avoid omitted variable bias, we use the ratio of the population of 65 years old over the total population (aging ratio) as a control variable. Empirical result indicates that no cointegration among these three variables. Granger causality test based on Bootstrap ARDL model demonstrates that one-way Granger causality running from HCE to aging ratio and from economic growth to both HCE and aging ratio. Empirical results have important policy implications for China understudy.

摘要

本研究旨在利用新开发的 Bootstrap 自回归分布滞后(ARDL)检验方法,考察 1990 年至 2019 年期间中国的医疗保健支出(HCE)与经济增长之间的关系。为避免遗漏变量偏差,我们使用 65 岁以上人口与总人口的比例(老龄化比例)作为控制变量。实证结果表明,这三个变量之间不存在协整关系。基于 Bootstrap ARDL 模型的格兰杰因果检验表明,从 HCE 到老龄化比例以及从经济增长到 HCE 和老龄化比例的单向格兰杰因果关系成立。实证结果对所研究的中国具有重要的政策意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b210/8858849/b58839e0e38b/fpubh-09-766091-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b210/8858849/8869bca15246/fpubh-09-766091-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b210/8858849/b58839e0e38b/fpubh-09-766091-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b210/8858849/8869bca15246/fpubh-09-766091-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b210/8858849/b58839e0e38b/fpubh-09-766091-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Are Healthcare Expenditures Related to Economic Growth in China? Bootstrap ARDL Approach.医疗保健支出与中国的经济增长有关吗? Bootstrap ARDL 方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 7;9:766091. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.766091. eCollection 2021.
2
The dynamic linkages among outbound tourism, economic growth, and international trade: empirical evidence from China.出境旅游、经济增长与国际贸易之间的动态联系:来自中国的实证证据。
SN Bus Econ. 2022;2(11):169. doi: 10.1007/s43546-022-00314-2. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
3
Longevity and Economic Growth in China and India Using a Newly Developed Bootstrap ARDL Model.使用新开发的自举自回归分布滞后模型研究中国和印度的长寿与经济增长
Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 7;8:291. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00291. eCollection 2020.
4
The relationship between health expenditure, CO emissions, and economic growth in the BRICS countries-based on the Fourier ARDL model.基于傅里叶自回归分布滞后模型的金砖国家卫生支出、碳排放与经济增长之间的关系
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(8):10908-10927. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17900-w. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
5
Developing long- and short-run nexus between industrial growth, economic growth, and trade balance of China.探讨中国工业增长、经济增长和贸易平衡之间的长期和短期关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(12):17772-17786. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17104-2. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
6
Electricity consumption and economic growth nexus in China: an autoregressive distributed lag approach.中国电力消费与经济增长的关系:自回归分布滞后方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(14):14627-14637. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04699-w. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
7
Environmental pollution of China to foreign investors: detrimental or beneficial?中国的环境污染对外国投资者而言:有害还是有益?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(11):13133-13150. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11549-7. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Revisiting the Relationship Between Suicide and Unemployment in Mexico: Evidence From Linear and Non-linear Co-integration.重新审视墨西哥自杀与失业之间的关系:来自线性和非线性协整的证据。
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 4;8:60. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00060. eCollection 2020.
9
Environmental implication of offshore economic activities in Indonesia: a dual analyses of cointegration and causality.印度尼西亚近海经济活动的环境影响:协整和因果关系的双重分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(31):32460-32475. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06352-y. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
10
Mediation of foreign direct investment and agriculture towards ecological footprint: a shift from single perspective to a more inclusive perspective for India.外商直接投资和农业对生态足迹的调解:印度从单一视角向更具包容性视角的转变。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(21):26817-26834. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09024-4. Epub 2020 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship between Health Expenditures and Economic Growth in EU Countries: Empirical Evidence Using Panel Fourier Toda-Yamamoto Causality Test and Regression Models.欧盟国家卫生支出与经济增长之间的关系:面板傅里叶托达-山本因果检验和回归模型的实证证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 16;19(22):15091. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215091.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of ageing population on health expenditure and economic growth in China: A Bayesian-VAR approach.人口老龄化对中国卫生支出和经济增长的影响:贝叶斯 VAR 方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113513. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113513. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
2
Health expenditure, human capital, and economic growth: an empirical study of developing countries.卫生支出、人力资本与经济增长:发展中国家的实证研究。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2020 Jun;20(2):163-176. doi: 10.1007/s10754-019-09275-w. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
3
The core determinants of health expenditure in the African context: some econometric evidence for policy.
非洲背景下卫生支出的核心决定因素:政策的一些计量经济学证据
Health Policy. 2009 Jun;91(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
4
On the international stability of health care expenditure functions: are government and private functions similar?论医疗保健支出函数的国际稳定性:政府函数与私人函数相似吗?
J Health Econ. 2004 May;23(3):589-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.08.007.
5
Modeling the effects of health on economic growth.模拟健康对经济增长的影响。
J Health Econ. 2001 May;20(3):423-40. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00073-x.
6
Health and endogenous growth.健康与内生增长。
J Health Econ. 2001 Mar;20(2):169-85. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00072-2.
7
The contribution of health services to the American economy.医疗服务对美国经济的贡献。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Oct;44(4):65-103.