Simons Lacy M, Lorenzo-Redondo Ramon, Gibson Meg, Kinch Sarah L, Vandervaart Jacob P, Reiser Nina L, Eren Mesut, Lux Elizabeth, McNally Elizabeth M, Tambur Anat R, Vaughan Douglas E, Bachta Kelly E R, Demonbreun Alexis R, Satchell Karla J F, Achenbach Chad J, Ozer Egon A, Ison Michael G, Hultquist Judd F
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Center for Pathogen Genomics and Microbial Evolution, Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 14;9(3):ofac027. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac027. eCollection 2022 Mar.
While several demographic and clinical correlates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcome have been identified, their relationship to virological and immunological parameters remains poorly defined.
To address this, we performed longitudinal collection of nasopharyngeal swabs and blood samples from a cohort of 58 hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Samples were assessed for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load, viral genotype, viral diversity, and antibody titer. Demographic and clinical information, including patient blood tests and several composite measures of disease severity, was extracted from electronic health records.
Several factors, including male sex, higher age, higher body mass index, higher 4C Mortality score, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, were associated with intensive care unit admission. Of all measured parameters, only the retrospectively calculated median Deterioration Index score was significantly associated with death. While quantitative polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold (Ct) values and genotype of SARS-CoV-2 were not significantly associated with outcome, Ct value did correlate positively with C-reactive protein levels and negatively with D-dimer, lymphocyte count, and antibody titer. Intrahost viral genetic diversity remained constant through the disease course and resulted in changes in viral genotype in some participants.
Ultimately, these results suggest that worse outcomes are driven by immune dysfunction rather than by viral load and that SARS-CoV-2 evolution in hospital settings is relatively constant over time.
虽然已经确定了2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)结局的一些人口统计学和临床相关因素,但其与病毒学和免疫学参数的关系仍不清楚。
为了解决这个问题,我们对58名住院的COVID-19成年患者进行了纵向鼻咽拭子和血液样本采集。对样本进行严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒载量、病毒基因型、病毒多样性和抗体滴度评估。从电子健康记录中提取人口统计学和临床信息,包括患者血液检查和几种疾病严重程度综合指标。
包括男性、高龄、较高体重指数、较高的4C死亡评分和乳酸脱氢酶水平升高在内的几个因素与入住重症监护病房相关。在所有测量参数中,只有回顾性计算的中位恶化指数评分与死亡显著相关。虽然SARS-CoV-2的定量聚合酶链反应循环阈值(Ct)值和基因型与结局无显著相关性,但Ct值与C反应蛋白水平呈正相关,与D-二聚体、淋巴细胞计数和抗体滴度呈负相关。宿主内病毒遗传多样性在疾病过程中保持恒定,并导致一些参与者的病毒基因型发生变化。
最终,这些结果表明,较差的结局是由免疫功能障碍而非病毒载量驱动的,并且医院环境中SARS-CoV-2的进化随时间相对恒定。