• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字化牙科模型:摄影测量法能否替代牙科口外和口内扫描仪?

Digital Dental Models: Is Photogrammetry an Alternative to Dental Extraoral and Intraoral Scanners?

作者信息

Zotti Francesca, Rosolin Luca, Bersani Massimo, Poscolere Andrea, Pappalardo Davide, Zerman Nicoletta

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, Paediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.

Private Practice, 37134 Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;10(2):24. doi: 10.3390/dj10020024.

DOI:10.3390/dj10020024
PMID:35200249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8871120/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

3D models are nowadays part of daily clinical practice. Photogrammetry is a brand-new method for transforming small objects into 3D models while keeping their original shape and size. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, in terms of precision and trueness, of a digital dental model acquired with photogrammetry compared with those obtained using extraoral scanners and intraoral scanners, starting from the same plaster model.

METHODS

A plaster model was converted into a digital model using photogrammetry, an extraoral scanner and an intraoral scanner. Different references were measured twice at a distance of 30 min for each model, on the digital models using the software Blender and on the plaster model using a calibre. The Interclass Correlation Coefficient was calculated for each pair of measurements. A volumetric analysis was performed by superimposing the digital models. The coefficient of variation was calculated. A two-way ANOVA test was conducted.

RESULTS

For each reference, the coefficient of variation was less than 3%, and the two ANOVA tests resulted in a non-significant value in both cases ( > 0.05). The volumetric analysis demonstrated good agreement between the models derived from the different acquisition methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Photogrammetry seems to be a good method for acquiring digital models starting from a plaster model, all the methods tested seem to be good for obtaining an accurate three-dimensional digital model. Other studies are needed to evaluate clinical efficacy.

摘要

背景

如今,3D模型已成为日常临床实践的一部分。摄影测量法是一种全新的方法,可将小物体转换为3D模型,同时保持其原始形状和大小。本研究的目的是从同一个石膏模型开始,评估通过摄影测量法获取的数字牙科模型在精度和真实性方面的准确性,并与使用口外扫描仪和口内扫描仪获得的模型进行比较。

方法

使用摄影测量法、口外扫描仪和口内扫描仪将石膏模型转换为数字模型。在每个模型上,每隔30分钟对不同的参考点进行两次测量,在数字模型上使用Blender软件,在石膏模型上使用卡尺。计算每对测量值的组内相关系数。通过叠加数字模型进行体积分析。计算变异系数。进行双向方差分析测试。

结果

对于每个参考点,变异系数均小于3%,并且两次方差分析测试在两种情况下均得出无显著意义的值(>0.05)。体积分析表明,不同采集方法得到的模型之间具有良好的一致性。

结论

摄影测量法似乎是一种从石膏模型获取数字模型的好方法,所有测试方法似乎都有利于获得准确的三维数字模型。需要进行其他研究来评估临床疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/cf14381dd922/dentistry-10-00024-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/b06188ba73e9/dentistry-10-00024-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/505b65916737/dentistry-10-00024-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/e63f75f8c4fc/dentistry-10-00024-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/152ad62509e7/dentistry-10-00024-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/e8431d2c5378/dentistry-10-00024-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/5522e2791c7f/dentistry-10-00024-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/502069ebcaed/dentistry-10-00024-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/09b6b975666c/dentistry-10-00024-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/f6d7c0098755/dentistry-10-00024-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/5f47d0b2576c/dentistry-10-00024-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/b30d64342ed5/dentistry-10-00024-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/15a0d1584f81/dentistry-10-00024-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/cf14381dd922/dentistry-10-00024-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/b06188ba73e9/dentistry-10-00024-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/505b65916737/dentistry-10-00024-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/e63f75f8c4fc/dentistry-10-00024-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/152ad62509e7/dentistry-10-00024-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/e8431d2c5378/dentistry-10-00024-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/5522e2791c7f/dentistry-10-00024-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/502069ebcaed/dentistry-10-00024-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/09b6b975666c/dentistry-10-00024-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/f6d7c0098755/dentistry-10-00024-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/5f47d0b2576c/dentistry-10-00024-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/b30d64342ed5/dentistry-10-00024-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/15a0d1584f81/dentistry-10-00024-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/8871120/cf14381dd922/dentistry-10-00024-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Dental Models: Is Photogrammetry an Alternative to Dental Extraoral and Intraoral Scanners?数字化牙科模型:摄影测量法能否替代牙科口外和口内扫描仪?
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;10(2):24. doi: 10.3390/dj10020024.
2
A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: An study.口腔内和口腔外数字印模的比较评估:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Apr-Jun;18(2):108-116. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_224_17.
3
In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans.口腔内外全弓扫描的准确性和精密度的体外评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Nov;126(5):665-670. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
4
Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.椅旁口内扫描仪与实验室扫描仪在全上颌无牙颌中的准确性比较:一项体外三维比较分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Dec;124(6):761.e1-761.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
5
Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.基牙形态对传统和数字化印模方法准确性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Sep;118(3):392-399. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.021. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
6
Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision.口腔内和口腔外数字扫描仪的比较:表面形貌和精度评估。
Dent J (Basel). 2020 May 20;8(2):52. doi: 10.3390/dj8020052.
7
Bias Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Extraoral Scanners and an Intraoral Scanner Based on ADA Standards.基于 ADA 标准评估两种口外扫描仪和一种口内扫描仪的准确性。
Scanning. 2021 Jun 10;2021:5535403. doi: 10.1155/2021/5535403. eCollection 2021.
8
Conformity, reliability and validity of digital dental models created by clinical intraoral scanning and extraoral plaster model digitization workflows.临床口内扫描和模型外石膏数字化工作流程创建的数字牙模型的一致性、可靠性和有效性。
Comput Biol Med. 2018 Sep 1;100:114-122. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.06.035. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
9
Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.摄影测量、口内扫描和传统印模技术在全口种植修复中的准确性:一项体外比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 10;21(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02005-0.
10
Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.不同头部尺寸的口内扫描仪在部分无牙颌下颌中获取的数字印模的准确性和精确性。
J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Jul;62(3):347-352. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of one-versus two-phase photogrammetry implant impression system: an in-vitro study.一比二阶段摄影测量种植体印模系统的准确性:一项体外研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2025 Aug 21;37(7-9):42. doi: 10.1007/s44445-025-00040-z.
2
A Novel Intraoral Optical Scan-Transfer Device for Full-Arch Implant Reconstruction.一种用于全牙弓种植修复的新型口腔内光学扫描传输装置。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Mar 19;13(3):134. doi: 10.3390/dj13030134.
3
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Models Generated Using Photogrammetry.使用摄影测量法生成的数字模型的准确性评估。

本文引用的文献

1
A critical assessment of the potential for Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry to produce high fidelity 3D dental models.运动结构摄影测量生成高保真 3D 牙科模型潜力的批判性评估。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020 Oct;173(2):381-392. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24109. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
2
Scanning accuracy of nondental structured light extraoral scanners compared with that of a dental-specific scanner.非牙科结构光口外扫描仪与专用牙科扫描仪的扫描精度比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jul;126(1):110-114. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
3
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 10;16(12):e75448. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75448. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Accuracy of Complete-Arch Scans Obtained by Intraoral Scanner and Smartphone Three-Dimensional Scanning Applications With Different Smartphone Position Setups: An In Vitro Study.不同智能手机位置设置下口腔内扫描仪和智能手机三维扫描应用获取的全牙弓扫描的准确性:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Jun 29;16(6):e63471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63471. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Cost-Effective Full-Color 3D Dental Imaging Based on Close-Range Photogrammetry.基于近景摄影测量的经济高效全彩3D牙科成像
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;10(11):1268. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10111268.
利用坐标测量机评估常规、摄影测量和口内扫描在全口种植体印模程序中的准确性比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Mar;125(3):470-478. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 May 6.
4
The Effect of Orthognathic Surgery on Soft-Tissue Facial Asymmetry: A Longitudinal Three-Dimensional Analysis.正颌手术对软组织面不对称性的影响:纵向三维分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Sep;31(6):1578-1582. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006403.
5
Photogrammetry as an alternative for acquiring digital dental models: A proof of concept.摄影测量学作为获取数字牙科模型的一种替代方法:概念验证。
Med Hypotheses. 2019 Jul;128:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 May 13.
6
An overview of guided bone regeneration.引导骨再生概述。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019 Jan-Feb;33(1 Suppl. 1):49-53.
7
Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature.牙科中的口内扫描仪:当前文献综述
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x.
8
The application of multi-baseline digital close-range photogrammetry in three-dimensional imaging and measurement of dental casts.多基线数字近景摄影测量在牙模三维成像与测量中的应用。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 22;12(6):e0178858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178858. eCollection 2017.
9
Evaluation of the accuracy of extraoral laboratory scanners with a single-tooth abutment model: A 3D analysis.单基牙模型评估口外实验室扫描仪的准确性:三维分析。
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Oct;61(4):363-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
10
Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial.时间效率、难度和术者偏好比较数字化与传统种植体印模:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Oct;28(10):1318-1323. doi: 10.1111/clr.12982. Epub 2016 Sep 5.