Fu Xiaoming, Peng Chun, Li Zan, Liu Shan, Tan Minmin, Song Jinlin
Chongqing Key Laboratory for Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing, China.
College of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 22;12(6):e0178858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178858. eCollection 2017.
To explore a new technique for reconstructing and measuring three-dimensional (3D) models of orthodontic plaster casts using multi-baseline digital close-range photogrammetry (MBDCRP) with a single-lens reflex camera.
Thirty sets of orthodontic plaster casts that do not exhibit severe horizontal overlap (>2 mm) between any two teeth were recorded by a single-lens reflex camera with 72 pictures taken in different directions. The 3D models of these casts were reconstructed and measured using the open source software MeshLab. These parameters, including mesio-distal crown diameter, arch width, and arch perimeter, were recorded six times on both the 3D digital models and on plaster casts by two examiners. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement between the novel method and the traditional calliper method by calculating the differences between mean values.
The average differences between the measurements of the photogrammetric 3D models and the plaster casts were 0.011-0.402mm. The mean differences between measurements obtained by the photogrammetric 3D models and the dental casts were not significant except for the lower arch perimeter (P>0.05), and all the differences were regarded as clinically acceptable (<0.5 mm).
Measurements obtained by MBDCRP are compared well with those obtained from plaster casts, indicating that MBDCRP is an alternate way to store and measure dental plaster casts without severe horizontal overlap between any two teeth.
探索一种使用单镜头反光相机的多基线数字近景摄影测量法(MBDCRP)重建和测量正畸石膏模型三维(3D)模型的新技术。
使用单镜头反光相机记录30套正畸石膏模型,这些模型的任意两颗牙齿之间均未出现严重水平重叠(>2mm),在不同方向拍摄72张照片。使用开源软件MeshLab重建并测量这些模型的3D模型。两名检查人员在3D数字模型和石膏模型上对包括近远中冠直径、牙弓宽度和牙弓周长在内的这些参数进行了六次记录。采用Bland-Altman方法进行统计分析,通过计算平均值之间的差异来测量新方法与传统卡尺方法之间的一致性。
摄影测量3D模型与石膏模型测量值之间的平均差异为0.011 - 0.402mm。除下颌牙弓周长外,摄影测量3D模型与石膏模型测量值之间的平均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且所有差异在临床上均可接受(<0.5mm)。
MBDCRP获得的测量值与石膏模型获得的测量值比较良好,表明MBDCRP是存储和测量任意两颗牙齿之间无严重水平重叠的牙科石膏模型的另一种方法。