Cole Kathryn E, Ly Quan P, Hollingsworth Michael A, Cox Jesse L, Fisher Kurt W, Padussis James C, Foster Jason M, Vargas Luciano M, Talmadge James E
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198 USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4990, USA.
Int Immunopharmacol. 2022 May;106:108628. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108628. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
In recent years, immune therapy, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), in conjunction with chemotherapy and surgery has demonstrated therapeutic activity for some tumor types. However, little is known about the optimal combination of immune therapy with standard of care therapies and approaches. In patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy has increased the number of patients who can undergo surgery and improved their responses. However, most chemotherapy is immunosuppressive, and few studies have examined the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) on patient immunity and/or the optimal combination of chemotherapy with immune therapy. Furthermore, the majority of chemo/immunotherapy studies focused on immune regulation in cancer patients have focused on postoperative (adjuvant) chemotherapy and are limited to peripheral blood (PB) and occasionally tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs); representing a minority of immune cells in the host. Our previous studies examined the phenotype and frequencies of myeloid and lymphoid cells in the PB and spleens of GI cancer patients, independent of chemotherapy regimen. These results led us to question the impact of NCT on host immunity. We report herein, unique studies examining the splenic and PB phenotypes, frequencies, and numbers of myeloid and lymphoid cell populations in NCT treated GI cancer patients, as compared to treatment naïve cancer patients and patients with benign GI tumors at surgery. Overall, we noted limited immunological differences in patients 6 weeks following NCT (at surgery), as compared to treatment naive patients, supporting rapid immune normalization. We observed that NCT patients had a lower myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) frequency in the spleen, but not the PB, as compared to treatment naive cancer patients and patients with benign GI tumors. Further, NCT patients had a higher splenic and PB frequency of CD4 T-cells, and checkpoint protein expression, as compared to untreated, cancer patients and patients with benign GI tumors. Interestingly, in NCT treated cancer patients the frequency of mature (CD45RO) CD4 and CD8 T-cells in the PB and spleens was higher than in treatment naive patients. These differences may also be associated, in part with patient stage, tumor grade, and/or NCT treatment regimen. In summary, the phenotypic profile of leukocytes at the time of surgery, approximately 6 weeks following NCT treatment in GI cancer patients, are similar to treatment naive GI cancer patients (i.e., patients who receive adjuvant therapy); suggesting that NCT may not limit the response to immune intervention and may improve tumor responses due to the lower splenic frequency of MDSCs and higher frequency of mature T-cells.
近年来,免疫疗法,尤其是免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI),与化疗和手术联合应用已在某些肿瘤类型中显示出治疗活性。然而,对于免疫疗法与标准治疗方法的最佳组合知之甚少。在胃肠道(GI)癌患者中,尤其是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者,术前(新辅助)化疗增加了可接受手术的患者数量并改善了他们的反应。然而,大多数化疗具有免疫抑制作用,很少有研究探讨新辅助化疗(NCT)对患者免疫的影响和/或化疗与免疫疗法的最佳组合。此外,大多数关注癌症患者免疫调节的化疗/免疫疗法研究都集中在术后(辅助)化疗,并且仅限于外周血(PB),偶尔也包括肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs);而这些仅占宿主免疫细胞的少数。我们之前的研究在不考虑化疗方案的情况下,检测了GI癌患者外周血和脾脏中髓系和淋巴系细胞的表型和频率。这些结果使我们质疑NCT对宿主免疫的影响。我们在此报告了独特的研究,比较了接受NCT治疗的GI癌患者与未接受治疗的癌症患者以及手术时患有良性GI肿瘤的患者,检测其脾脏和外周血中髓系和淋巴系细胞群体的表型、频率和数量。总体而言,我们注意到与未接受治疗的患者相比,NCT治疗后6周(手术时)患者的免疫差异有限,这支持了免疫的快速恢复正常。我们观察到,与未接受治疗的癌症患者和患有良性GI肿瘤的患者相比,NCT患者脾脏中髓系来源的抑制细胞(MDSCs)频率较低,但外周血中并非如此。此外,与未接受治疗的癌症患者和患有良性GI肿瘤的患者相比,NCT患者脾脏和外周血中CD4 T细胞的频率以及检查点蛋白表达更高。有趣的是,在接受NCT治疗的癌症患者中,外周血和脾脏中成熟(CD45RO)CD4和CD8 T细胞的频率高于未接受治疗的患者。这些差异可能也部分与患者分期、肿瘤分级和/或NCT治疗方案有关。总之,GI癌患者在NCT治疗后约6周手术时白细胞的表型特征与未接受治疗的GI癌患者(即接受辅助治疗的患者)相似;这表明NCT可能不会限制对免疫干预的反应,并且由于脾脏中MDSCs频率较低和成熟T细胞频率较高,可能会改善肿瘤反应。