• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线动态检查期间颈椎活动度数量的检查者间信度和效度

Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection.

作者信息

Leonet-Tijero Leire, Corral-de-Toro Jaime, Rodríguez-Sanz Jacobo, Hernández-Secorún Mar, Abenia-Benedí Hugo, Lucha-López María Orosia, Monti-Ballano Sofía, Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte Julián, Tricás-Vidal Héctor, Hidalgo-García César, Tricás-Moreno José Miguel

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, C/Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

Physiotherapy Research Unit, University of Zaragoza, C/Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 21;12(2):546. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020546.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics12020546
PMID:35204635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8870754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical therapists routinely measure range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine. The reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device has been demonstrated in several studies, but current evidence on the validity and reliability of the visual inspection is contradictory. The aim is to assess the validity and interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection of active cervical ROM in physiotherapy students.

METHODS

Flexion, extension, both lateral flexions and rotations of a single participant were measured using CROM. Online visual inspection of 18 physiotherapy students against CROM was registered.

RESULTS

The validity, against CROM, of the online visual inspection of the active ROM ranged from good to excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 0.83-0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection had favorable outcomes in all cervical movements in the three physiotherapy courses (ICC 0.70-0.96), with the visual inspection of the rotations being the most reliable (ICC 0.93-0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the classification of mobility was poor to good (Kappa 0.03-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

The interexaminer reliability and validity of the quantification of active cervical movement during online visual inspection was shown to be good to excellent for flexion-extension and lateral flexions and excellent for rotations.

摘要

背景

物理治疗师经常测量颈椎的活动范围（ROM）。多项研究已证实颈椎活动范围（CROM）装置的可靠性，但目前关于视觉检查有效性和可靠性的证据相互矛盾。目的是评估物理治疗专业学生主动颈椎活动范围在线视觉检查的有效性和检查者间可靠性。

方法

使用CROM测量一名参与者的前屈、后伸、双侧侧屈和旋转。记录18名物理治疗专业学生相对于CROM的在线视觉检查情况。

结果

主动活动范围在线视觉检查相对于CROM的有效性从良好到优秀（组内相关系数（ICC）为0.83 - 0.97）。在三门物理治疗课程中，在线视觉检查的检查者间可靠性在所有颈椎运动中都有良好结果（ICC为0.70 - 0.96），其中旋转的视觉检查最可靠（ICC为0.93 - 0.97）。活动度分类的检查者间可靠性从差到良好（kappa值为0.03 - 0.90）。

结论

在线视觉检查期间主动颈椎活动量化的检查者间可靠性和有效性在屈伸和侧屈方面显示为良好到优秀，在旋转方面为优秀。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d69b/8870754/a15bf9027359/diagnostics-12-00546-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d69b/8870754/9a3eeb9ef03f/diagnostics-12-00546-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d69b/8870754/896bc3b14841/diagnostics-12-00546-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d69b/8870754/a15bf9027359/diagnostics-12-00546-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d69b/8870754/9a3eeb9ef03f/diagnostics-12-00546-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d69b/8870754/896bc3b14841/diagnostics-12-00546-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d69b/8870754/a15bf9027359/diagnostics-12-00546-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection.在线动态检查期间颈椎活动度数量的检查者间信度和效度
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 21;12(2):546. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020546.
2
The use of electromagnetic tracking technology for measurement of passive cervical range of motion: a pilot study.电磁跟踪技术用于测量被动颈椎活动范围的初步研究。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Mar-Apr;26(3):152-9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-4754(02)54107-5.
3
Validity and reliability of Veloflex to measure active cervical range of motion in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.Veloflex测量无症状和有症状受试者主动颈椎活动范围的有效性和可靠性。
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 5;9:e11228. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11228. eCollection 2021.
4
Reliability and validity of a Coda Motion 3-D Analysis system for measuring cervical range of motion in healthy subjects.用于测量健康受试者颈椎活动范围的Coda Motion三维分析系统的可靠性和有效性。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Feb;38:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
5
Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device.颈椎活动度（CROM）装置的有效性和日内可靠性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.
6
Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults.用于健康成年人旋转活动范围的颈椎活动范围（CROM）装置的效标效度研究。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Apr;36(4):242-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.242.
7
A novel virtual reality application for autonomous assessment of cervical range of motion: development and reliability study.一种新型虚拟现实应用程序，用于自主评估颈椎活动范围：开发和可靠性研究。
PeerJ. 2022 Sep 14;10:e14031. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14031. eCollection 2022.
8
Between-week reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for upper cervical rotation.颈椎活动度（CROM）装置在上颈椎旋转中的周间可靠性。
J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Jun;29(3):176-180. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1805691. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
9
Test - re-test reliability and concurrent validity of cervical active range of motion in young asymptomatic adults using a new inertial measurement unit device.使用新型惯性测量单元设备测试年轻无症状成年人颈椎主动活动范围的重测信度和同时效度。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Oct;18(10):1029-1037. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1971971. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
10
Cervical Range of Motion Assessment through Inertial Technology: A Validity and Reliability Study.基于惯性技术的颈椎活动度评估：一项有效性和可靠性研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;23(13):6013. doi: 10.3390/s23136013.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical Spine Evaluation by Telephone and Video Visit.通过电话和视频问诊进行颈椎评估。
Cureus. 2021 Nov 19;13(11):e19741. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19741. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Patient experience of telemedicine for headache care during the COVID-19 pandemic: An American Migraine Foundation survey study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间远程医疗用于头痛护理的患者体验：美国偏头痛基金会的一项调查研究
Headache. 2021 May;61(5):734-739. doi: 10.1111/head.14110. Epub 2021 May 21.
3
Smartphone Applications as a Suitable Alternative to CROM Device and Inclinometers in Assessing the Cervical Range of Motion in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain.
在评估非特异性颈部疼痛患者的颈椎活动范围时，智能手机应用程序可作为CROM设备和倾角仪的合适替代方案。
J Chiropr Med. 2020 Mar;19(1):38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2019.10.004. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
Validity and Reliability of Smartphones in Assessing Spinal Kinematics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.智能手机评估脊柱运动学的有效性和可靠性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Jul-Aug;43(6):635-645. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.10.012. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
5
Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer.颈椎活动度（CROM）量角器的评估者间和评估者内可靠性。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jun 12;2020:8908035. doi: 10.1155/2020/8908035. eCollection 2020.
6
Photogrammetric Variables Used by Physical Therapists to Detect Neck Pain and to Refer for Physiotherapeutic Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study.物理治疗师用于检测颈部疼痛并转介进行物理治疗干预的摄影测量变量：一项横断面研究。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 May;42(4):254-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.014. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
Validity and reliability of two Smartphone applications to measure the lower and upper cervical spine range of motion in subjects with chronic cervical pain.两款用于测量慢性颈痛患者下颈椎和上颈椎活动范围的智能手机应用程序的有效性和可靠性。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(4):619-627. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181260.
8
Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review.物理治疗师的学习风格：系统范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1434-5.
9
Reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess posture, pain location, and cervical spine mobility in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 4. A systematic review from the cervical assessment and diagnosis research evaluation (CADRE) collaboration.评估成年人颈部疼痛及其相关疾病的姿势、疼痛部位和颈椎活动度的临床检查的可靠性和有效性：第 4 部分。来自颈椎评估和诊断研究评估 (CADRE) 合作的系统评价。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Dec;38:128-147. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
10
Reliability of Smartphone Inclinometry to Measure Upper Cervical Range of Motion.智能手机测角法测量上颈椎活动范围的可靠性
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Jan 1;28(1). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0048.