Department of Physical and Social Education, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas LT-44221, Lithuania.
Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas LT-44221, Lithuania.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 13;19(4):2098. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042098.
This study aimed to test the mediating effects of nature restorativeness, stress, and nature connectedness in the association between nature exposure and quality of life (QoL). Urban and rural Lithuanian inhabitants (n = 924; 73.6% were women), mean age of 40.0 ± 12.4 years (age range of 18-79) participated in the study. In total, 31% of the respondents lived in rural areas. Study participants completed an online survey form with measures on sociodemographic factors, nature proximity, nature exposure, nature connectedness, and nature restorativeness, stress, and QoL assessed by the abbreviated version of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Questionnaire's (WHOQOL-BREF). Path analysis was conducted to test the mediating effects of nature restorativeness, stress, and nature connectedness in the model of nature exposure and QoL. Nature exposure was directly associated with a greater QoL (β = 0.14; = 2.60; SE = 0.57; < 0.001) and mediated the association between nature proximity and QoL. Nature restorativeness and lower stress levels were mediators between nature exposure and QoL. Nature connectedness was a mediator between nature exposure and QoL. A path model was invariant across genders and the urban and rural place of residence groups: patterns of loadings of the pathways were found to be similar. Nature restorativeness (β = 0.10-0.12; < 0.01) had a positive effect on the psychological, physical, social, and environmental domains of QoL. Connectedness to nature positively predicted psychological (β = 0.079; < 0.05) and environmental (β = 0.082; < 0.05) domains of QoL. Enhancing nature exposure and nature connectedness might help strengthen QoL in urban and rural inhabitants.
本研究旨在测试自然恢复力、压力和与自然的联系在自然暴露与生活质量(QoL)之间的关联中的中介作用。城市和农村立陶宛居民(n=924;73.6%为女性),平均年龄为 40.0±12.4 岁(年龄范围为 18-79 岁)参与了研究。共有 31%的受访者居住在农村地区。研究参与者完成了一份在线调查问卷,其中包括社会人口因素、接近自然的程度、自然暴露、与自然的联系以及自然恢复力、压力和生活质量的评估,生活质量采用世界卫生组织生活质量问卷(WHOQOL-BREF)的简化版进行评估。路径分析用于测试自然暴露与 QoL 模型中自然恢复力、压力和与自然的联系的中介作用。自然暴露与更高的生活质量直接相关(β=0.14;t=2.60;SE=0.57;p<0.001),并介导了接近自然程度与生活质量之间的关联。自然恢复力和较低的压力水平是自然暴露与生活质量之间的中介因素。与自然的联系是自然暴露与生活质量之间的中介因素。一个路径模型在性别和城乡居住地点群体中是不变的:发现路径的加载模式相似。自然恢复力(β=0.10-0.12;p<0.01)对生活质量的心理、身体、社会和环境领域有积极影响。与自然的联系积极预测心理(β=0.079;p<0.05)和环境(β=0.082;p<0.05)领域的生活质量。增强自然暴露和与自然的联系可能有助于提高城市和农村居民的生活质量。