• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息和情感要素在中国的在线心理和生理疾病社区之间有何不同?抑郁和糖尿病的比较研究。

Do Informational and Emotional Elements Differ between Online Psychological and Physiological Disease Communities in China? A Comparative Study of Depression and Diabetes.

机构信息

School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.

Center for the Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;19(4):2167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042167.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19042167
PMID:35206355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8872467/
Abstract

Disease-specific online health communities provide a convenient and common platform for patients to share experiences, change information, provide and receive social support. This study aimed to compare differences between online psychological and physiological disease communities in topics, sentiment, participation, and emotional contagion patterns using multiple methods as well as to discuss how to satisfy the users' different informational and emotional needs. We chose the online depression and diabetes communities on the Baidu Tieba platform as the data source. Topic modeling and theme coding were employed to analyze discussion preferences for various topic categories. Sentiment analysis was used to identify the sentiment polarity of each post and comment. The social network was used to represent the users' interaction and emotional flows to discover the differences in participation and emotional contagion patterns between psychological and physiological disease communities. The results revealed that people affected by depression focused more on their symptoms and social relationships, while people affected by diabetes were more likely to discuss treatment and self-management behavior. In the depression community, there were obvious interveners spreading positive emotions and more core users in the negative emotional contagion network. In the diabetes community, emotional contagion was less prevalent and core users in positive and negative emotional contagion networks were basically the same. The study reveals insights into the differences between online psychological and physiological disease communities, providing a greater understanding of the users' informational and emotional needs expressed online. These results are helpful for society to provide actual medical assistance and deploy health interventions based on disease types.

摘要

特定疾病的在线健康社区为患者提供了一个方便且常用的平台,用于分享经验、交流信息、提供和接受社会支持。本研究旨在通过多种方法比较在线心理和生理疾病社区在主题、情绪、参与度和情感传染模式方面的差异,并探讨如何满足用户不同的信息和情感需求。我们选择了百度贴吧平台上的在线抑郁症和糖尿病社区作为数据源。采用主题建模和主题编码来分析各种主题类别的讨论偏好。使用情感分析来确定每个帖子和评论的情绪极性。利用社交网络来表示用户的互动和情感流,以发现心理和生理疾病社区之间在参与度和情感传染模式方面的差异。研究结果表明,受抑郁症影响的人更关注自身症状和社会关系,而受糖尿病影响的人则更倾向于讨论治疗和自我管理行为。在抑郁症社区中,存在明显的干预者传播积极情绪,且在消极情绪传染网络中有更多的核心用户。在糖尿病社区中,情感传染则不太普遍,积极和消极情感传染网络中的核心用户基本相同。该研究揭示了在线心理和生理疾病社区之间的差异,进一步了解了用户在线表达的信息和情感需求。这些结果有助于社会根据疾病类型提供实际的医疗援助和部署健康干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/0b297abf2873/ijerph-19-02167-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/948c634068aa/ijerph-19-02167-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/54de5d1de148/ijerph-19-02167-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/a0523349a063/ijerph-19-02167-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/1e6e92f0b606/ijerph-19-02167-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/0b297abf2873/ijerph-19-02167-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/948c634068aa/ijerph-19-02167-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/54de5d1de148/ijerph-19-02167-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/a0523349a063/ijerph-19-02167-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/1e6e92f0b606/ijerph-19-02167-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14f4/8872467/0b297abf2873/ijerph-19-02167-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Do Informational and Emotional Elements Differ between Online Psychological and Physiological Disease Communities in China? A Comparative Study of Depression and Diabetes.信息和情感要素在中国的在线心理和生理疾病社区之间有何不同?抑郁和糖尿病的比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;19(4):2167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042167.
2
Determining the Topic Evolution and Sentiment Polarity for Albinism in a Chinese Online Health Community: Machine Learning and Social Network Analysis.确定中国在线健康社区中白化病的主题演变和情感极性:机器学习与社会网络分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 May 29;8(5):e17813. doi: 10.2196/17813.
3
Development of Social Support Networks by Patients With Depression Through Online Health Communities: Social Network Analysis.抑郁症患者通过在线健康社区建立社会支持网络:社会网络分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jan 7;9(1):e24618. doi: 10.2196/24618.
4
Study on Differences between Patients with Physiological and Psychological Diseases in Online Health Communities: Topic Analysis and Sentiment Analysis.在线健康社区中生理和心理疾病患者差异的研究:主题分析和情感分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):1508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051508.
5
Eliciting and receiving online support: using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support.引出并接受在线支持:使用计算机辅助内容分析来审视在线社会支持的动态变化。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 20;17(4):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3558.
6
Peer Support for Chronic Pain in Online Health Communities: Quantitative Study on the Dynamics of Social Interactions in a Chronic Pain Forum.在线健康社区中的慢性疼痛同伴支持:慢性疼痛论坛中社会互动动态的定量研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 5;26:e45858. doi: 10.2196/45858.
7
Exploring the Online Behavior of Users of Online Depression-Focused Communities: Comparing Communities with Different Management Types.探索专注于抑郁症的在线社区用户的在线行为:比较不同管理类型的社区
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Oct 14;14:1707-1724. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S323027. eCollection 2021.
8
Research on gender differences in online health communities.在线健康社区中的性别差异研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Mar;111:172-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.019. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
9
Analyzing and Predicting User Participations in Online Health Communities: A Social Support Perspective.从社会支持视角分析与预测用户在在线健康社区中的参与度
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 24;19(4):e130. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6834.
10
Using Online Support Communities for Tourette Syndrome and Tic Disorders: Online Survey of Users' Experiences.使用在线支持社区治疗妥瑞氏症和抽动障碍:用户体验的在线调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 3;22(11):e18099. doi: 10.2196/18099.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotions spread like contagious diseases.情绪像传染病一样蔓延。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 9;16:1493512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1493512. eCollection 2025.
2
Health information needs and feedback of users in the online TCM community.用户在中医在线社区中的健康信息需求和反馈。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0301536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301536. eCollection 2024.
3
Words for the hearts: a corpus study of metaphors in online depression communities.心灵之语:在线抑郁症社区隐喻的语料库研究

本文引用的文献

1
Natural Language Processing Reveals Vulnerable Mental Health Support Groups and Heightened Health Anxiety on Reddit During COVID-19: Observational Study.自然语言处理揭示了新冠疫情期间Reddit上脆弱的心理健康支持小组以及加剧的健康焦虑:一项观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 12;22(10):e22635. doi: 10.2196/22635.
2
Perceptions of difference and disdain on the self-stigma of mental illness.对精神疾病的自我污名化的感知:差异和蔑视。
J Ment Health. 2022 Feb;31(1):22-28. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1803231. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
A Comparative Study of Online Depression Communities in China.
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 30;14:1227123. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1227123. eCollection 2023.
中国在线抑郁社区的比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 13;17(14):5023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145023.
4
Twitter usage about autism spectrum disorder.关于自闭症谱系障碍的推特使用情况。
Autism. 2020 Oct;24(7):1805-1816. doi: 10.1177/1362361320923173. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
5
Determining the Topic Evolution and Sentiment Polarity for Albinism in a Chinese Online Health Community: Machine Learning and Social Network Analysis.确定中国在线健康社区中白化病的主题演变和情感极性:机器学习与社会网络分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 May 29;8(5):e17813. doi: 10.2196/17813.
6
Study on Differences between Patients with Physiological and Psychological Diseases in Online Health Communities: Topic Analysis and Sentiment Analysis.在线健康社区中生理和心理疾病患者差异的研究:主题分析和情感分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;17(5):1508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051508.
7
Finding Users' Voice on Social Media: An Investigation of Online Support Groups for Autism-Affected Users on Facebook.在社交媒体上寻找用户的声音:对 Facebook 上受自闭症影响的用户的在线支持小组的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 29;16(23):4804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234804.
8
Who says what? Content and participation characteristics in an online depression community.谁说了什么?一个在线抑郁社区的内容和参与特征。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:521-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
9
Detecting associations between dietary supplement intake and sentiments within mental disorder tweets.检测精神障碍相关推文中医用补充剂摄入量与情绪之间的关联。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Jun;26(2):803-815. doi: 10.1177/1460458219867231. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
10
The association of depression stigma with barriers to seeking mental health care: a cross-sectional analysis.抑郁污名与寻求心理健康服务障碍的关联:一项横断面分析。
J Ment Health. 2020 Apr;29(2):182-190. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1644494. Epub 2019 Aug 2.