Suppr超能文献

学校供餐计划:全球情况如何?

School Feeding Programs: What Happens Globally?

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, College of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil.

Master's Programs Public Health, Department of Nutrition, College of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042265.

Abstract

School feeding programs (SFPs) are an important effort to address food insecurity, improve nutritional education, and ultimately improve health outcomes. The objective of this research was to describe the nutritional, cultural, food safety, and agro-family participation of SFPs in different countries and observe the SFP in low-middle and high-income countries to establish disparities. The study followed documentary research of SFP official online resources complemented by a literature review. The programs were assessed in four criteria: (1) nutritional aspects, (2) cultural aspects, (3) food safety, and (4) agro-family participation. Out of 192 countries registered, 117 countries (60.93%) have an SFP, and only 8 (4.16%) do not have SFPs. A total of 67 countries (34.89%) did not have an official online resource and did not respond to follow-up emails. Out of the 117 countries with SFP, all of them had a detailed description of their nutritional aspects, cultural aspects (11.96%), food safety (16.23%), and agro-family participation (23.93%). Europe and Central Asia were the continents with the most comprehensive SFP. While most countries incorporate nutritional aspects and healthy food, cultural, food safety, and agro-family participation must be incorporated in their SPF to optimize children and adolescent development. Moreover, the study identified disparities across countries where the SFPs were identified in low-middle countries compared to middle- and high-income countries.

摘要

学校供餐计划(SFPs)是解决粮食不安全、改善营养教育、最终改善健康结果的重要举措。本研究的目的是描述不同国家的 SFP 在营养、文化、食品安全和农业家庭参与方面的情况,并观察中低收入和高收入国家的 SFP,以确定差异。该研究采用了对 SFP 官方在线资源的文献研究,并辅以文献综述。该计划在四个标准下进行评估:(1)营养方面,(2)文化方面,(3)食品安全,和(4)农业家庭参与。在注册的 192 个国家中,有 117 个国家(60.93%)有 SFP,只有 8 个国家(4.16%)没有 SFP。共有 67 个国家(34.89%)没有官方在线资源,也没有回复后续电子邮件。在有 SFP 的 117 个国家中,所有国家都详细描述了其营养方面、文化方面(11.96%)、食品安全(16.23%)和农业家庭参与(23.93%)。欧洲和中亚是 SFP 最全面的大陆。虽然大多数国家都纳入了营养方面和健康食品,但必须在其 SFP 中纳入文化、食品安全和农业家庭参与,以优化儿童和青少年的发展。此外,该研究还发现,与中高收入国家相比,中低收入国家的 SFP 存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e77/8871860/a7d79f603e34/ijerph-19-02265-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验