Suppr超能文献

学校菜单的可接受性:评估方法的系统评价。

Acceptability of School Menus: A Systematic Review of Assessment Methods.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032242.

Abstract

The school meal promotes healthy eating habits through nutritionally adequate preparations. Consequently, it prevents obesity and malnutrition, favoring learning. This systematic review aimed at investigating the methods for evaluating the acceptance of school menus offered by school feeding programs (SFPs) around the world. Specific search strategies were conducted on PubMed, Lilacs, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Global. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Meta-Analysis Statistical Assessment and Review Instrument. A total of 89 studies were included. The countries with the highest number of studies were Brazil ( = 42), South Korea ( = 13), and the United States ( = 12). The most used methods (69.66%) were numerical scales, with a higher prevalence for the 5-point scale (50.56%). Other methods included questionnaires and/or interviews with objective and/or subjective questions (44.94%); and mathematical formulas and/or visual estimates evaluating the consumption of food and leftovers (40.45%). The prevalent use of the 5-point hedonic scale may be due to its low cost, simplicity, ease of elaboration, application speed, and student understanding. Mathematical formulas and/or visual estimation were used by about 40% of the studies, but it is difficult to compare studies.

摘要

学校餐食通过营养充足的准备来促进健康饮食习惯。因此,它可以预防肥胖和营养不良,有利于学习。本系统评价旨在调查评估世界各地学校供餐计划(SFPs)提供的学校菜单接受度的方法。在 PubMed、Lilacs、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase、Google Scholar 和 ProQuest Global 上进行了具体的搜索策略。使用 Meta-Analysis Statistical Assessment and Review Instrument 评估纳入研究的方法学质量。共纳入 89 项研究。研究数量最多的国家是巴西(=42)、韩国(=13)和美国(=12)。使用最多的方法(69.66%)是数字量表,其中 5 点量表的流行度更高(50.56%)。其他方法包括带有客观和/或主观问题的问卷和/或访谈(44.94%);以及评估食物和剩菜消耗的数学公式和/或视觉估计(40.45%)。5 点愉悦量表的普遍使用可能是由于其成本低、简单、易于制定、应用速度快和学生理解。约 40%的研究使用了数学公式和/或视觉估计,但很难对研究进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39dc/9914958/e18f16541799/ijerph-20-02242-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验