Pezzo Mario Piergiulio, Tufano Antonella, Franchini Massimo
Department of Transfusion Medicine and Hematology, Carlo Poma Hospital, 46100 Mantova, Italy.
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 9;11(4):915. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040915.
Ischemic stroke risk in atrial fibrillation differs from patient to patient, depending on numerous variables. Many attempts have been made to translate this difference into simple numbers and to compare it to the hemorrhagic risk of anticoagulation. Different clinical scores have been studied to define a clear strategy. One score, the CHADS-VASc score, has been extensively and successfully applied worldwide. Nevertheless, it is not yet the "perfect instrument". Many proposals have been made to integrate its clinical parameters with some biomarkers to improve its predictive power. This short review describes some of these biomarkers and their possible implications in potentiating the efficacy of clinical scores.
心房颤动患者的缺血性中风风险因人而异,取决于众多变量。人们已多次尝试将这种差异转化为简单数字,并与抗凝治疗的出血风险进行比较。为确定明确策略,已对不同的临床评分进行了研究。其中一个评分,即CHADS-VASc评分,已在全球广泛且成功应用。然而,它仍不是“完美工具”。人们已提出许多建议,将其临床参数与一些生物标志物相结合,以提高其预测能力。这篇简短综述介绍了其中一些生物标志物及其在增强临床评分疗效方面的可能意义。