From the Klinik für Neurologie mit Experimenteller Neurologie (L.H.A.B., H.S., C.H.N., M.E., J.F.S.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB) (L.H.A.B., H.S., C.H.N., M.E., B.S., J.F.S.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1085-1093. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028323. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
Background and Purpose- Our study aim was to estimate risk of incident stroke based on levels of hs-cTn (high-sensitivity cardiac troponin), a specific biomarker indicating myocardial injury, in the general population, patients with atrial fibrillation, and patients with previous stroke. Methods- Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched until March 14, 2019 to identify relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies assessing the risk of incident stroke based on hs-cTn were eligible. Pooled adjusted hazard ratios including 95% CI were calculated using a random-effects model due to study heterogeneity per population, coding of hs-cTn (categorical/continuous data), per hs-cTn subunit (T or I), for low risk of bias, and for all-cause and ischemic stroke separately. Results- We included 17 articles with 96 702 participants. In studies conducted in the general population (n=12; 77 780 participants), the pooled adjusted hazard ratio for incident stroke was 1.25 (CI, 1.10-1.40) for high versus low hs-cTn (as defined by included studies) during an average follow-up of 1 to 20 years (median 10). When categorical data were used, this was increased to 1.58 (CI, 1.26-1.90). The results were robust when accounting for stroke classification (all-cause stroke/ischemic stroke), hs-cTn subunit, risk of bias, and coding of hs-cTn. In patients with atrial fibrillation (4 studies; 18 725 participants), the pooled adjusted hazard ratio for incident stroke was 1.95 (CI, 1.29-2.62) for high versus low hs-cTn. Due to lack of data (one study, 197 participants), no meta-analysis could be performed in patients with previous stroke. Conclusions- This meta-analysis suggests that hs-cTn can be regarded as a risk marker for incident stroke, with different effect size in different subgroups. More research about the association between hs-cTn and incident stroke in high-risk populations is needed, especially in patients with history of ischemic stroke.
背景与目的- 本研究旨在评估人群、心房颤动患者和既往卒中患者中,高敏心肌肌钙蛋白(hs-cTn)水平作为特定心肌损伤标志物与新发卒中风险的相关性。方法- 检索 Embase、PubMed 和 Web of Science,截至 2019 年 3 月 14 日,以识别相关文章。符合纳入标准的研究为评估 hs-cTn 预测新发卒中风险的随机对照试验和队列研究。由于人群、hs-cTn 编码(分类/连续数据)、hs-cTn 亚单位(T 或 I)、低偏倚风险、所有原因和缺血性卒中的异质性,使用随机效应模型计算了汇总调整后的危险比及其 95%可信区间。结果- 共纳入 17 项研究,共 96702 例参与者。在人群研究(n=12,77780 例参与者)中,在平均 1 至 20 年(中位数 10 年)的随访期间,高 hs-cTn(纳入研究定义)与低 hs-cTn 相比,新发卒中的汇总调整后危险比为 1.25(95%CI,1.10-1.40)。当使用分类数据时,该比值增加至 1.58(95%CI,1.26-1.90)。当考虑卒中分类(所有原因卒中/缺血性卒中)、hs-cTn 亚单位、偏倚风险和 hs-cTn 编码时,结果稳健。在心房颤动患者(4 项研究,18725 例参与者)中,高 hs-cTn 与低 hs-cTn 相比,新发卒中的汇总调整后危险比为 1.95(95%CI,1.29-2.62)。由于缺乏数据(一项研究,197 例参与者),无法对既往卒中患者进行荟萃分析。结论- 本荟萃分析表明,hs-cTn 可视为新发卒中的风险标志物,在不同亚组中其作用大小不同。需要更多关于 hs-cTn 与高危人群新发卒中相关性的研究,特别是在有缺血性卒中病史的患者中。