• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性对“视角”的认知:一个乳腺癌风险分层电子平台。

Women's perceptions of PERSPECTIVE: a breast cancer risk stratification e-platform.

作者信息

Ahmed Saima, Lévesque Emmanuelle, Garland Rosalind, Knoppers Bartha, Dorval Michel, Simard Jacques, Loiselle Carmen G

机构信息

Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

CIUSSS Centre-Ouest Montréal, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Feb 24;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00214-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13053-022-00214-4
PMID:35209930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8867776/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer risk stratification categorizes a woman's potential risk of developing the disease as near-population, intermediate, or high. In accordance, screening and follow up for breast cancer can readily be tailored following risk assessment. Recent efforts have focussed on developing more accessible means to convey this information to women. This study sought to document the relevance of an informational e-platform developed for these purposes.

OBJECTIVE

To begin to assess a newly developed breast cancer risk stratification and decision support e-platform called PERSPECTIVE (PErsonalised Risk Stratification for Prevention and Early deteCTIon of breast cancer) among women who do not know their personal breast cancer risk (Phase 1). Changes (pre- and post- e-platform exposure) in knowledge of breast cancer risk and interest in undergoing genetic testing were assessed in addition to perceptions of platform usability and acceptability.

METHODS

Using a pre-post design, women (N = 156) of differing literacy and education levels, aged 30 to 60, with no previous breast cancer diagnosis were recruited from the general population and completed self-report e-questionnaires.

RESULTS

Mean e-platform viewing time was 18.67 min (SD 0.65) with the most frequently visited pages being breast cancer-related risk factors and risk assessment. Post-exposure, participants reported  significantly higher breast cancer-related knowledge (p < .001). Increases in knowledge relating to obesity, alcohol, breast density, menstruation, and the risk estimation process remained even when sociodemographic variables age and education were controlled. There were no significant changes in genetic testing interest post-exposure. Mean ratings for e-platform acceptability and usability were high: 26.19 out of 30 (SD 0.157) and 42.85 out of 50 (SD 0.267), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An informative breast cancer risk stratification e-platform targeting healthy women in the general population can significantly increase knowledge as well as support decisions around breast cancer risk and assessment. Currently underway, Phase 2, called PERSPECTIVE, is seeking further content integration and broader implementation .

摘要

背景

乳腺癌风险分层将女性患该疾病的潜在风险分为接近总体风险、中等风险或高风险。据此,乳腺癌的筛查和随访可以在风险评估后轻松进行调整。最近的努力集中在开发更易于获取的方式,将这些信息传达给女性。本研究旨在记录为这些目的开发的信息电子平台的相关性。

目的

在不了解自身乳腺癌风险的女性中(第1阶段),开始评估一个新开发的名为PERSPECTIVE(个性化乳腺癌预防和早期检测风险分层)的乳腺癌风险分层和决策支持电子平台。除了对平台可用性和可接受性的认知外,还评估了(在接触电子平台前后)乳腺癌风险知识的变化以及进行基因检测的兴趣。

方法

采用前后设计,从普通人群中招募年龄在30至60岁、识字和教育水平不同、既往无乳腺癌诊断的女性(N = 156),并完成自我报告电子问卷。

结果

电子平台的平均浏览时间为18.67分钟(标准差0.65),访问最频繁的页面是与乳腺癌相关的风险因素和风险评估。接触电子平台后,参与者报告的乳腺癌相关知识显著增加(p < 0.001)。即使在控制了社会人口统计学变量年龄和教育程度后,与肥胖、酒精、乳腺密度、月经和风险估计过程相关的知识仍有所增加。接触电子平台后,进行基因检测的兴趣没有显著变化。电子平台可接受性和可用性的平均评分很高:分别为30分中的26.19分(标准差0.157)和50分中的42.85分(标准差0.267)。

结论

一个针对普通人群中健康女性的信息丰富的乳腺癌风险分层电子平台可以显著增加知识,并支持围绕乳腺癌风险和评估的决策。目前正在进行的第2阶段,即PERSPECTIVE,正在寻求进一步的内容整合和更广泛的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d0c/8867776/62c63655edeb/13053_2022_214_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d0c/8867776/751060a33a9d/13053_2022_214_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d0c/8867776/62c63655edeb/13053_2022_214_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d0c/8867776/751060a33a9d/13053_2022_214_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d0c/8867776/62c63655edeb/13053_2022_214_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Women's perceptions of PERSPECTIVE: a breast cancer risk stratification e-platform.女性对“视角”的认知:一个乳腺癌风险分层电子平台。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Feb 24;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00214-4.
2
Perceptions and Usability of PREVENTION: A Breast Cancer Risk Assessment e-Platform.预防乳腺癌风险评估电子平台的认知与可用性
J Pers Med. 2023 May 18;13(5):850. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050850.
3
Dutch women's intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers.荷兰女性参与基于风险的乳腺癌筛查和预防计划的意愿:一项调查研究,确定偏好、促进因素和障碍。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07464-2.
4
Women's perceptions of personalized risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: An international focus group study.女性对基于个性化风险的乳腺癌筛查和预防的认知:一项国际焦点小组研究。
Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):1056-1062. doi: 10.1002/pon.5051. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
5
Women's perceptions of the adoption of personalised risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention: a systematic review.女性对采用基于个体化风险的乳腺癌筛查和初级预防措施的看法:系统评价。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Oct;57(10):1275-1283. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1481291. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
6
European women's perceptions of the implementation and organisation of risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: a qualitative study.欧洲女性对基于风险的乳腺癌筛查和预防的实施和组织的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 24;20(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06745-0.
7
Randomized Trial of Personalized Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk Notification.个性化乳腺密度与乳腺癌风险通知的随机试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Apr;34(4):591-597. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4622-4. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
8
Mobile Breast Cancer e-Support Program for Chinese Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy (Part 1): Qualitative Study of Women's Perceptions.针对正在接受化疗的中国乳腺癌女性的移动乳腺癌电子支持项目(第1部分):女性认知的定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 11;6(4):e85. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9311.
9
Women's decision-making regarding risk-stratified breast cancer screening and prevention from the perspective of international healthcare professionals.从国际医疗保健专业人员的角度来看,女性在风险分层乳腺癌筛查和预防方面的决策。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0197772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197772. eCollection 2018.
10
Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making.有乳腺癌家族史的健康女性:定制的遗传咨询干预对风险认知、知识及绝经治疗决策的影响
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):843-56. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.843.

引用本文的文献

1
"For and against" factors influencing participation in personalized breast cancer screening programs: a qualitative systematic review until March 2022.影响参与个性化乳腺癌筛查项目的“支持与反对”因素:截至2022年3月的定性系统评价
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;82(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01248-x.
2
Perceptions and Usability of PREVENTION: A Breast Cancer Risk Assessment e-Platform.预防乳腺癌风险评估电子平台的认知与可用性
J Pers Med. 2023 May 18;13(5):850. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050850.
3
-A Focus Group and Survey Study on Women's Attitudes towards Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening and Personalised Risk Assessments.

本文引用的文献

1
Informing Women About Overdetection in Breast Cancer Screening: Two-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial.在乳腺癌筛查中告知女性过度检测:一项随机试验的两年结果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 2;113(11):1523-1530. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab083.
2
Web-based decision aids for cancer clinical decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于网络的癌症临床决策辅助工具:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6929-6941. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06184-y. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
3
Personalized Screening for Breast Cancer: Rationale, Present Practices, and Future Directions.
基于风险的乳腺癌筛查和个体化风险评估的女性态度的焦点小组和调查研究。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 25;29(12):9181-9198. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120719.
4
Feasibility and Acceptability of Personalized Breast Cancer Screening (DECIDO Study): A Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Trial.基于个体的乳腺癌筛查的可行性和可接受性(DECIDO 研究):一项单臂概念验证试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 21;19(16):10426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610426.
乳腺癌个体化筛查:原理、现行实践与未来方向。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;28(8):4306-4317. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09426-1. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Web-based decision aids to support breast cancer screening decisions: systematic review and meta-analysis.基于网络的决策辅助工具以支持乳腺癌筛查决策:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Oct;9(14):985-1002. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0052. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Risk stratified breast cancer screening: UK healthcare policy decision-making stakeholders' views on a low-risk breast screening pathway.风险分层乳腺癌筛查:英国医疗保健政策决策利益相关者对低风险乳腺癌筛查途径的看法。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 22;20(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07158-9.
6
Women's views about breast cancer prevention at mammography screening units and well women's clinics.女性在乳房 X 光筛查单位和常规妇女诊所对乳腺癌预防的看法。
Curr Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(3):e336-e342. doi: 10.3747/co.27.5755. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
7
Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement.乳腺癌个体化早期检测和预防:ENVISION 共识声明。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov;17(11):687-705. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0388-9. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
8
Risk stratification in breast cancer screening: Cost-effectiveness and harm-benefit ratios for low-risk and high-risk women.乳腺癌筛查中的风险分层:低危和高危女性的成本效益和危害-获益比。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Dec 1;147(11):3059-3067. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33126. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
9
Worldwide Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies Measuring the Effect of Mammography Screening Programmes on Incidence-Based Breast Cancer Mortality.测量乳腺钼靶筛查计划对基于发病率的乳腺癌死亡率影响的队列研究的全球综述与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Apr 15;12(4):976. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040976.
10
Modes of e-Health delivery in secondary prevention programmes for patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review.冠心病患者二级预防项目中的电子健康服务提供模式:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4106-1.