• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童接种 COVID-19 疫苗的作用-疫苗的帕累托最优分配。

The role of childrens' vaccination for COVID-19-Pareto-optimal allocations of vaccines.

机构信息

Faculty of Mathematics, Technion - IIT, Haifa, Israel.

Department of Applied Mathematics, ORT Braude College of Engineering, Karmiel, Israel.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Feb 25;18(2):e1009872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009872. eCollection 2022 Feb.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009872
PMID:35213541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8906616/
Abstract

COVID-19 vaccines have been approved for children of age five and older in many countries. However, there is an ongoing debate as to whether children should be vaccinated and at what priority. In this work, we use mathematical modeling and optimization to study how vaccine allocations to different age groups effect epidemic outcomes. In particular, we consider the effect of extending vaccination campaigns to include the vaccination of children. When vaccine availability is limited, we consider Pareto-optimal allocations with respect to competing measures of the number of infections and mortality and systematically study the trade-offs among them. In the scenarios considered, when some weight is given to the number of infections, we find that it is optimal to allocate vaccines to adolescents in the age group 10-19, even when they are assumed to be less susceptible than adults. We further find that age group 0-9 is included in the optimal allocation for sufficiently high values of the basic reproduction number.

摘要

在许多国家,COVID-19 疫苗已获准用于 5 岁及以上的儿童。然而,对于儿童是否应该接种疫苗以及接种的优先级如何,目前仍存在争议。在这项工作中,我们使用数学建模和优化来研究向不同年龄组分配疫苗如何影响疫情结果。特别是,我们考虑了扩大疫苗接种活动以包括儿童接种疫苗的影响。当疫苗供应有限时,我们考虑了针对感染人数和死亡率等竞争措施的帕累托最优分配,并系统地研究了它们之间的权衡。在所考虑的情况下,当给予感染人数一定权重时,我们发现将疫苗分配给 10-19 岁的青少年是最优的,即使他们被认为比成年人更不易感染。我们进一步发现,对于基本繁殖数足够高的情况,0-9 岁年龄组也包含在最优分配中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed61/8906616/8f2660df03d4/pcbi.1009872.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed61/8906616/94894da6acd8/pcbi.1009872.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed61/8906616/8f2660df03d4/pcbi.1009872.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed61/8906616/94894da6acd8/pcbi.1009872.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed61/8906616/8f2660df03d4/pcbi.1009872.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of childrens' vaccination for COVID-19-Pareto-optimal allocations of vaccines.儿童接种 COVID-19 疫苗的作用-疫苗的帕累托最优分配。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Feb 25;18(2):e1009872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009872. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Optimal vaccine allocation for COVID-19 in the Netherlands: A data-driven prioritization.优化 COVID-19 疫苗在荷兰的分配:基于数据的优先级排序。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Dec 13;17(12):e1009697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009697. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Time-varying optimization of COVID-19 vaccine prioritization in the context of limited vaccination capacity.在有限的疫苗接种能力背景下,COVID-19 疫苗接种的时变优化。
Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 3;12(1):4673. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24872-5.
4
Relaxing restrictions at the pace of vaccination increases freedom and guards against further COVID-19 waves.放宽疫苗接种速度的限制,增加自由,并防范新冠疫情的进一步波动。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Sep 2;17(9):e1009288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009288. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Modelling direct and herd protection effects of vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in Australia.建模澳大利亚针对 SARS-CoV-2 Delta 变异株的疫苗接种对直接和群体保护的效果。
Med J Aust. 2021 Nov 1;215(9):427-432. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51263. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
6
A model-based strategy for the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out in the Philippines.基于模型的菲律宾 COVID-19 疫苗推广策略。
J Theor Biol. 2023 Sep 21;573:111596. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111596. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
7
Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy.评估美国 COVID-19 疫苗分配策略。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 17;16(11):e0259700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259700. eCollection 2021.
8
Developing a Framework for Pandemic COVID-19 Vaccine Allocation: a Modified Delphi Consensus Study in Korea.制定大流行 COVID-19 疫苗分配框架:韩国的一项改良德尔菲共识研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jun 14;36(23):e166. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e166.
9
[Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2022-2023)].《中国季节性流感疫苗接种技术指南(2022—2023年)》
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 10;43(10):1515-1544. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220825-00734.
10
[Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2022-2023)].《中国季节性流感疫苗接种技术指南(2022—2023年)》
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 6;56(10):1356-1386. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220825-00840.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models.从新冠疫情中学习:数学疫苗优先排序模型的系统综述
Infect Dis Model. 2024 May 15;9(4):1057-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.05.005. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Incorporating social determinants of health into transmission modeling of COVID-19 vaccine in the US: a scoping review.将健康的社会决定因素纳入美国 COVID-19 疫苗传播模型:一项范围综述。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jun 7;35:100806. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100806. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Expanding growers' choice of plant disease management options can promote suboptimal social outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal vaccination at high reproductive numbers: sharp transitions and counterintuitive allocations.高繁殖数下的最佳疫苗接种:急剧转变和违反直觉的分配。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 28;289(1983):20221525. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1525.
2
Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy.评估美国 COVID-19 疫苗分配策略。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 17;16(11):e0259700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259700. eCollection 2021.
3
Covid-19: global vaccine production is a mess and shortages are down to more than just hoarding.
扩大种植者对植物病害管理选项的选择可能会导致次优的社会结果。
Plant Pathol. 2023 Jun;72(5):933-950. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13705. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
4
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models.从新冠疫情中学习:数学疫苗优先级模型的系统综述
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 7:2024.03.04.24303726. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.04.24303726.
5
Predictive models for health outcomes due to SARS-CoV-2, including the effect of vaccination: a systematic review.预测 SARS-CoV-2 导致的健康结果的模型,包括疫苗接种的效果:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;13(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02411-1.
6
Optimal vaccination at high reproductive numbers: sharp transitions and counterintuitive allocations.高繁殖数下的最佳疫苗接种:急剧转变和违反直觉的分配。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 28;289(1983):20221525. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1525.
新冠疫情:全球疫苗生产一团糟,短缺不仅仅是因为囤积。
BMJ. 2021 Oct 28;375:n2375. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2375.
4
How antiviral pill molnupiravir shot ahead in the COVID drug hunt.抗病毒药物莫努匹拉韦在新冠药物研发竞赛中如何领先。
Nature. 2021 Oct 8. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02783-1.
5
More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 的 50 多种长期影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):16144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8.
6
The reproductive number of the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 is far higher compared to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 virus.与原始的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒相比,SARS-CoV-2 的 Delta 变体的繁殖数要高得多。
J Travel Med. 2021 Oct 11;28(7). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taab124.
7
Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: An update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era.预测 177 个地理区域的接触矩阵:对 COVID-19 时代的经验数据的更新和比较。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jul 26;17(7):e1009098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009098. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Should children get COVID vaccines? What the science says.儿童应该接种新冠疫苗吗?科学依据如是说。
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7869):638-639. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01898-9.
9
A focused protection vaccination strategy: why we should not target children with COVID-19 vaccination policies.一种有针对性的保护性疫苗接种策略:为何我们不应将儿童作为新冠疫苗接种政策的目标人群。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Aug;47(8):565-566. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107700. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
10
Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study.2019冠状病毒病的疫苗接种与非药物干预措施:一项数学建模研究
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;21(6):793-802. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00143-2. Epub 2021 Mar 18.