VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0263591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263591. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this pragmatic, embedded, adaptive trial was to measure the effectiveness of the subcutaneous anti-IL-6R antibody sarilumab, when added to an evolving standard of care (SOC), for clinical management of inpatients with moderate to severe COVID-19 disease.
Two-arm, randomized, open-label controlled trial comparing SOC alone to SOC plus sarilumab. The trial used a randomized play-the-winner design and was fully embedded within the electronic health record (EHR) system.
5 VA Medical Centers.
Hospitalized patients with clinical criteria for moderate to severe COVID-19 but not requiring mechanical ventilation, and a diagnostic test positive for SARS-CoV-2.
Sarilumab, 200 or 400 mg subcutaneous injection. SOC was not pre-specified and could vary over time, e.g., to include antiviral or other anti-inflammatory drugs.
The primary outcome was intubation or death within 14 days of randomization. All data were extracted remotely from the EHR.
Among 162 eligible patients, 53 consented, and 50 were evaluated for the primary endpoint of intubation or death. This occurred in 5/20 and 1/30 of participants in the sarilumab and SOC arms respectively, with the majority occurring in the initial 9 participants (3/4 in the sarilumab and 1/5 in the SOC) before the sarilumab dose was increased to 400 mg and before remdesivir and dexamethasone were widely adopted. After interim review, the unblinded Data Monitoring Committee recommended that the study be stopped due to concern for safety: a high probability that rates of intubation or death were higher with addition of sarilumab to SOC (92.6%), and a very low probability (3.4%) that sarilumab would be found to be superior.
This randomized trial of patients hospitalized due to respiratory compromise from COVID-19 but not mechanical ventilation found no benefit from subcutaneous sarilumab when added to an evolving SOC. The numbers of patients and events were too low to allow definitive conclusions to be drawn, but this study contributes valuable information about the role of subcutaneous IL-6R inhibition in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods developed and piloted during this trial will be useful in conducting future studies more efficiently.
Clinicaltrials.gov-NCT04359901; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04359901?cond=NCT04359901&draw=2&rank=1.
本务实、嵌入式、适应性试验旨在评估皮下注射抗 IL-6R 抗体 sarilumab 对中重度 COVID-19 住院患者临床管理的疗效,该药物在不断变化的标准治疗(SOC)基础上使用。
两项随机、开放标签对照试验,比较 SOC 单药治疗与 SOC 加 sarilumab 治疗。该试验采用随机优胜者设计,并完全嵌入电子病历(EHR)系统中。
5 家退伍军人事务部医疗中心。
符合中重度 COVID-19 临床标准但无需机械通气且 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性的住院患者。
sarilumab,200 或 400 mg 皮下注射。SOC 未预先指定,且可能随时间变化,例如包括抗病毒或其他抗炎药物。
主要结局是随机分组后 14 天内插管或死亡。所有数据均从 EHR 远程提取。
在 162 名符合条件的患者中,有 53 名同意参加,50 名患者接受了主要终点插管或死亡的评估。在 sarilumab 组和 SOC 组中,分别有 5/20 和 1/30 的参与者发生了这一事件,其中大多数发生在最初的 9 名参与者中(sarilumab 组 3/4,SOC 组 1/5),在 sarilumab 剂量增加至 400 mg 之前,以及在瑞德西韦和地塞米松广泛应用之前。在中期审查后,未设盲的数据监测委员会建议因安全性担忧停止研究:添加 sarilumab 到 SOC 后,插管或死亡的发生率很高(92.6%),而 sarilumab 被发现更有效的可能性非常低(3.4%)。
本项针对因 COVID-19 呼吸衰竭而非机械通气而住院的患者进行的随机试验发现,在不断变化的 SOC 基础上添加皮下 sarilumab 并无益处。患者人数和事件数量太少,无法得出明确结论,但本研究为住院 COVID-19 患者中皮下 IL-6R 抑制的治疗作用提供了有价值的信息。该试验中开发和试用的方法将有助于更有效地进行未来的研究。
Clinicaltrials.gov-NCT04359901;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04359901?cond=NCT04359901&draw=2&rank=1.