Suppr超能文献

识别洪水风险管理中基于自然的解决方案的障碍:使用专家社区方法的跨学科综述。

Identifying barriers for nature-based solutions in flood risk management: An interdisciplinary overview using expert community approach.

机构信息

Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, J. E. Purkyně University, Ústí nad Labem, Czechia.

Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2022 May 15;310:114725. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114725. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Abstract

The major event that hit Europe in summer 2021 reminds society that floods are recurrent and among the costliest and deadliest natural hazards. The long-term flood risk management (FRM) efforts preferring sole technical measures to prevent and mitigate floods have shown to be not sufficiently effective and sensitive to the environment. Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) mark a recent paradigm shift of FRM towards solutions that use nature-derived features, processes and management options to improve water retention and mitigate floods. Yet, the empirical evidence on the effects of NBS across various settings remains fragmented and their implementation faces a series of institutional barriers. In this paper, we adopt a community expert perspective drawing upon LAND4FLOOD Natural flood retention on private land network (https://www.land4flood.eu) in order to identify a set of barriers and their cascading and compound interactions relevant to individual NBS. The experts identified a comprehensive set of 17 barriers affecting the implementation of 12 groups of NBS in both urban and rural settings in five European regional environmental domains (i.e., Boreal, Atlantic, Continental, Alpine-Carpathian, and Mediterranean). Based on the results, we define avenues for further research, connecting hydrology and soil science, on the one hand, and land use planning, social geography and economics, on the other. Our suggestions ultimately call for a transdisciplinary turn in the research of NBS in FRM.

摘要

2021 年夏天袭击欧洲的重大事件提醒社会,洪水是反复发生的,也是代价最高和最致命的自然灾害之一。长期的洪水风险管理(FRM)工作优先采用单一的技术措施来预防和减轻洪水,但事实证明,这些措施在环境方面的效果和敏感度都不够。基于自然的解决方案(NBS)标志着 FRM 最近向使用源自自然的特征、过程和管理选项来提高水的保留和减轻洪水的解决方案转变。然而,关于 NBS 在各种环境中的效果的经验证据仍然分散,并且它们的实施面临一系列制度障碍。在本文中,我们采用社区专家的视角,借鉴 LAND4FLOOD 自然洪水保留在私人土地网络(https://www.land4flood.eu),以确定与个别 NBS 相关的一系列障碍及其级联和复合相互作用。专家们确定了 17 个综合障碍,这些障碍影响着 12 组 NBS 在五个欧洲区域环境领域(即北方、大西洋、大陆、阿尔卑斯-喀尔巴阡和地中海)的城市和农村地区的实施。基于这些结果,我们定义了进一步研究的途径,将水文学和土壤科学与土地利用规划、社会地理和经济学联系起来。我们的建议最终呼吁在 FRM 的 NBS 研究中进行跨学科转变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验