Kiefer Markus, Pielke Lena, Trumpp Natalie M
Department of Psychiatry, Section for Cognitive Electrophysiology, Ulm University, Leimgrubenweg 12, Ulm D-89075, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Section for Cognitive Electrophysiology, Ulm University, Leimgrubenweg 12, Ulm D-89075, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2022 May 15;252:119036. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119036. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
Refined grounded cognition accounts propose that abstract concepts might be grounded in brain circuits involved in mentalizing. In the present event-related potential (ERP) study, we compared the time course of neural processing in response to semantically predefined abstract mental states and verbal association concepts during a lexical decision task. In addition to scalp ERPs, source estimates of underlying volume brain activity were determined to reveal spatio-temporal clusters of greater electrical brain activity to abstract mental state vs. verbal association concepts, and vice versa. Source estimates suggested early (onset 194 ms), but short-lived enhanced activity (offset 210 ms) to verbal association concepts in left occipital regions. Increased occipital activity might reflect retrieval of visual word form or access to visual conceptual features of associated words. Increased estimated source activity to mental state concepts was obtained in visuo-motor (superior parietal, pre- and postcentral areas) and mentalizing networks (lateral and medial prefrontal areas, insula, precuneus, temporo-parietal junction) with an onset of 212 ms, which extended to later time windows. The time course data indicated two processing phases: An initial conceptual access phase, in which linguistic and modal brain circuits rapidly process features depending on their relevance, and a later conceptual elaboration phase, in which elaborative processing within feature-specific networks further refines the concept. This study confirms the proposal that abstract concepts are based on representations in distinct neural circuits depending on their semantic feature content. The present research also highlights the importance of investigating sets of abstract concepts with a defined semantic content.
精细的具身认知理论认为,抽象概念可能基于参与心理化过程的脑回路。在当前这项事件相关电位(ERP)研究中,我们在词汇判断任务中比较了对语义预定义的抽象心理状态和言语联想概念做出反应时神经处理的时间进程。除头皮ERP外,还确定了潜在脑区活动的源估计,以揭示与抽象心理状态概念相比,对言语联想概念具有更强脑电活动的时空簇,反之亦然。源估计表明,左枕叶区域对言语联想概念有早期(起始时间194毫秒)但短暂的增强活动(结束时间210毫秒)。枕叶活动增加可能反映了视觉单词形式的检索或对相关单词视觉概念特征的获取。在视觉运动网络(顶上叶、中央前回和中央后回区域)和心理化网络(外侧和内侧前额叶区域、脑岛、楔前叶、颞顶联合区)中,对心理状态概念的源活动估计增加,起始时间为212毫秒,并持续到更晚的时间窗口。时间进程数据表明存在两个处理阶段:一个初始概念获取阶段,其中语言和模态脑回路根据其相关性快速处理特征;以及一个后期概念细化阶段,其中特定特征网络内的细化处理进一步完善概念。本研究证实了抽象概念基于不同神经回路中与其语义特征内容相关的表征这一观点。本研究还强调了研究具有明确语义内容的抽象概念集的重要性。