• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克朗巴哈系数与项目间的语义重叠:一项修正建议及显著性检验

Cronbach's Alpha and Semantic Overlap Between Items: A Proposed Correction and Tests of Significance.

作者信息

Alkhadim Ghadah S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, College of Arts, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;13:815490. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815490. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815490
PMID:35222202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8867700/
Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to address the shortcomings of Cronbach's alpha concerning the semantic overlap between items. Using an example from a motivational measure, the correction of Cronbach's alpha was applied by partialing out the effects due to conceptual overlap. The significance of Cronbach's alpha was tested using simulated random data derived from the measure and by estimating the confidence intervals with known and unknown distributions. The results indicated that the uncorrected conceptual overlap coefficient alpha was equal to 0.89 and 0.66 following the correction. After simulating the corrected statistical results, the distribution of alpha with random numbers had an estimate of 95%, equal to 0.41. The lower bound of the corrected alpha distribution was equal to 0.41, suggesting that the corrected alpha could easily belong to the distribution of alpha developed from simulated random numbers. Thus, the semantic overlap between items on a measure represents a significant threat to the validity of the alpha coefficient.

摘要

本研究的目的是解决克朗巴哈系数在项目间语义重叠方面的不足。以一项动机测量为例,通过排除概念重叠的影响来应用克朗巴哈系数的校正。使用从该测量中得出的模拟随机数据,并通过估计已知和未知分布的置信区间来检验克朗巴哈系数的显著性。结果表明,未校正的概念重叠系数α为0.89,校正后为0.66。模拟校正后的统计结果后,α随随机数的分布估计有95%等于0.41。校正后α分布的下限等于0.41,这表明校正后的α很可能属于由模拟随机数得出的α分布。因此,测量项目间的语义重叠对α系数的有效性构成了重大威胁。

相似文献

1
Cronbach's Alpha and Semantic Overlap Between Items: A Proposed Correction and Tests of Significance.克朗巴哈系数与项目间的语义重叠:一项修正建议及显著性检验
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;13:815490. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815490. eCollection 2022.
2
SAS and SPSS macros to calculate standardized Cronbach's alpha using the upper bound of the phi coefficient for dichotomous items.用于使用二分法项目的phi系数上限计算标准化克朗巴哈系数的SAS和SPSS宏。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Feb;39(1):71-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03192845.
3
[Validation of the French version of the Body Shape Questionnaire].[《身体形态问卷》法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82383-8.
4
Validity of a filipino translation of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory.耳鸣残障量表菲律宾语翻译版的效度
Int Tinnitus J. 2012;17(1):64-9.
5
A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach's Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers.克朗巴哈α系数检验样本量确定综述:给研究者的简易指南
Malays J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;25(6):85-99. doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
6
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数,接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.
7
Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements.现实条件下克朗巴哈α信度的最佳替代方法:同属与不对称测量
Front Psychol. 2016 May 26;7:769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769. eCollection 2016.
8
Initial validation of the Yin-Yang Assessment Questionnaire for persons with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者阴阳评估问卷的初步验证
World J Diabetes. 2015 Sep 10;6(11):1198-206. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i11.1198.
9
[Estimation of Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the context of item response theory].[项目反应理论背景下克朗巴哈α系数的估计]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2002 Aug;73(3):227-33. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.73.227.
10
EXACT DISTRIBUTIONS OF INTRACLASS CORRELATION AND CRONBACH'S ALPHA WITH GAUSSIAN DATA AND GENERAL COVARIANCE.具有高斯数据和一般协方差的组内相关系数和克朗巴哈系数的精确分布
Psychometrika. 2004 Sep;69(3):459-474. doi: 10.1007/BF02295646.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of the CHD-PEBBS: A Scale to Assess Perceived Exercise Benefits and Barriers in Coronary Heart Disease Patients.冠心病患者运动益处与障碍感知量表(CHD-PEBBS)的编制与验证
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jul 22;19:2147-2159. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S524436. eCollection 2025.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory.《神经性正食症量表中文版的跨文化适应及心理测量特性》
Front Nutr. 2025 Jan 23;11:1491544. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1491544. eCollection 2024.
3
Validation of the Korean Version of the 24-Item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire: A Multicenter Study from the Korean Research Society of Spinal Deformity.

本文引用的文献

1
A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.分析重测信度的基础。
Psychometrika. 1945;10:255-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02288892.
2
A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework.一个2×2的成就目标框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Mar;80(3):501-19. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501.
3
Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients.系数α及相关的内部一致性信度系数。
24项早发性脊柱侧弯问卷韩文版的验证:来自韩国脊柱畸形研究学会的多中心研究
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(1):123-129. doi: 10.4055/cios24210. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the febrile convulsion knowledge scale for parents/caregivers: translation and validation study.针对家长/照料者的中文版热性惊厥知识量表的心理测量学评估:翻译与验证研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 17;23(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02073-x.
5
Correlation among job-induced stress, overall well-being, and cardiovascular risk in Italian workers of logistics and distribution.意大利物流与配送行业工人的工作压力、整体幸福感与心血管风险之间的相关性。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 9;12:1358212. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1358212. eCollection 2024.
6
Predictors and incidence of depression and anxiety in women undergoing infertility treatment: A cross-sectional study.接受不孕症治疗的女性的抑郁和焦虑的预测因素和发生率:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0284414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284414. eCollection 2023.
Psychol Methods. 2000 Sep;5(3):343-55. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.3.343.