Nguyen Phuong The, Van Nguyen Huy, Le Phuong Mai, Phung Huyen Thi, Dao An Thi Minh, Hayashi Kuniyoshi, Gilmour Stuart
Graduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.
Division of Surveillance and Policy Evaluation, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, 5 Chome-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo City, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Dec 28;25:101692. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101692. eCollection 2022 Feb.
We translated the Effort-Reward imbalance questionnaire, an instrument for measuring work stress, into the Vietnamese language and investigated its psychometric properties among nurses in Vietnam. In a hospital-based cross-sectional study design, we sampled and interviewed 207 nurses working full-time (response rate 83%). We evaluated the internal consistency using standardized Cronbach's alpha coefficients and structural validity using confirmatory factor analysis. Discriminative validity was assessed by comparing the measured scores between age groups, gender, education levels, income groups, and job positions. In addition, we confirmed the criterion validity by investigating its association with self-reported health using simple and multiple logistic regression models. Most of the participants were female (73.3%), young (average 28.5 years old), and had education levels of college or higher (53.5%). We observed sufficient internal consistency in effort, reward, and over-commitment scales (Cronbach's alpha 0.80, 0.76, and 0.68, respectively). Confirmatory factor analysis of the three-factor hierarchical model showed an acceptable fit and fair construct validity with most moderate or stronger (>0.3) factor loading coefficients. Poor self-rated health was more likely in respondents in both Effort-Reward ratio's middle tertile (adjusted Odd-Ratio = 2.80, p-value = 0.031) and highest tertile (adjusted Odd-Ratio = 2.64, p-value = 0.05), adjusting for age, gender, and education levels. The Effort-reward imbalance scale has adequate reliability and validity for assessing work stress among nurses in Vietnam. Its significant association with poor self-rated health warrants further investigation. The validated instrument can help measure the effort-reward imbalance to manage better work-related emotional strains and mental health issues among nurses and ensure human resources' stability in healthcare in Vietnam.
我们将用于测量工作压力的努力-回报失衡问卷翻译成越南语,并在越南护士群体中对其心理测量特性进行了调查。在一项基于医院的横断面研究设计中,我们对207名全职工作的护士进行了抽样和访谈(应答率为83%)。我们使用标准化的克朗巴哈系数评估内部一致性,并使用验证性因子分析评估结构效度。通过比较不同年龄组、性别、教育水平、收入组和工作岗位之间的测量得分来评估区分效度。此外,我们通过使用简单和多元逻辑回归模型研究其与自我报告健康状况的关联来确认效标效度。大多数参与者为女性(73.3%),较为年轻(平均年龄28.5岁),教育水平为大专及以上(53.5%)。我们观察到努力、回报和过度投入量表具有足够的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数分别为0.80、0.76和0.68)。三因素层次模型的验证性因子分析显示拟合度可接受,且具有合理的结构效度,大多数因子载荷系数适中或较强(>0.3)。在调整年龄、性别和教育水平后,努力-回报比处于中间三分位数(调整后的比值比=2.80,p值=0.031)和最高三分位数(调整后的比值比=2.64,p值=0.05)的受访者自我评定健康状况较差的可能性更高。努力-回报失衡量表在评估越南护士的工作压力方面具有足够的信度和效度。其与自我评定健康状况较差的显著关联值得进一步研究。经过验证的该工具有助于测量努力-回报失衡,以更好地管理护士与工作相关的情绪压力和心理健康问题,并确保越南医疗保健领域人力资源的稳定性。