• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不太聪明且不自知?智力不同方面自我评估的准确性及邓宁-克鲁格效应

Less-Intelligent and Unaware? Accuracy and Dunning-Kruger Effects for Self-Estimates of Different Aspects of Intelligence.

作者信息

Hofer Gabriela, Mraulak Valentina, Grinschgl Sandra, Neubauer Aljoscha C

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

J Intell. 2022 Feb 5;10(1):10. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10010010.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence10010010
PMID:35225925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8883889/
Abstract

People's perceptions of their intelligence correlate only moderately with objective intelligence measures. On average, people overestimate themselves. According to the popular Dunning-Kruger effect, this is particularly true for low performers: across many domains, those in the lowest quartile overestimate their abilities the most. However, recent work using improved statistical approaches found little support for a Dunning-Kruger effect in general intelligence. We investigated accuracy and Dunning-Kruger effects for self-estimates of general, verbal, numerical, and spatial intelligence-domains that differed in how well they can be judged in the past. A total of 281 participants completed self-estimates and intelligence measures online. Self-estimates showed mostly moderate correlational accuracy that was slightly higher for numerical intelligence and lower for verbal intelligence. Across domains, participants rated their intelligence as above average. However, as their intelligence was indeed high, this was not an overestimation. While standard analyses indicated Dunning-Kruger effects in general, verbal, and spatial intelligence, improved statistical methods only yielded some support for one in verbal intelligence: people with lower verbal intelligence tended to have less self-knowledge about it. The generalizability of these findings is limited to young, highly educated populations. Nevertheless, our results contribute to a growing literature questioning the generality of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

摘要

人们对自身智力的认知与客观智力测量结果之间的关联程度仅为中等。平均而言,人们会高估自己。根据广为人知的邓宁-克鲁格效应,低水平表现者尤其如此:在许多领域,处于最低四分位数的人对自己能力的高估最为严重。然而,最近使用改进统计方法的研究发现,一般智力方面几乎没有证据支持邓宁-克鲁格效应。我们研究了一般智力、言语智力、数字智力和空间智力自我评估的准确性及邓宁-克鲁格效应,这些领域在过去的可判断程度上存在差异。共有281名参与者在线完成了自我评估和智力测试。自我评估大多显示出中等程度的相关准确性,数字智力的准确性略高,言语智力的准确性较低。在各个领域,参与者都将自己的智力评为高于平均水平。然而,由于他们的智力确实较高,这并非高估。虽然标准分析表明在一般智力、言语智力和空间智力方面存在邓宁-克鲁格效应,但改进的统计方法仅在言语智力方面提供了一些支持:言语智力较低的人对其自身的了解往往较少。这些发现的普遍性仅限于年轻、受过高等教育的人群。尽管如此,我们的结果为越来越多质疑邓宁-克鲁格效应普遍性的文献做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
Less-Intelligent and Unaware? Accuracy and Dunning-Kruger Effects for Self-Estimates of Different Aspects of Intelligence.不太聪明且不自知?智力不同方面自我评估的准确性及邓宁-克鲁格效应
J Intell. 2022 Feb 5;10(1):10. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10010010.
2
Dunning-Kruger effects in face perception.面孔知觉中的邓宁-克鲁格效应。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104345. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104345. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
No strong support for a Dunning-Kruger effect in creativity: analyses of self-assessment in absolute and relative terms.创造力中不存在明显的邓宁-克鲁格效应:从绝对值和相对值两方面进行自我评价的分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 24;14(1):11883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61042-1.
4
Skill and self-knowledge: empirical refutation of the dual-burden account of the Dunning-Kruger effect.技能与自我认知:对邓宁-克鲁格效应双重负担解释的实证反驳
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Dec 7;9(12):191727. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191727. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Unskilled and optimistic: overconfident predictions despite calibrated knowledge of relative skill.不熟练且乐观:尽管对相对技能有校准的了解,但仍做出过于自信的预测。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):601-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0379-2.
6
Unskilled and unaware: second-order judgments increase with miscalibration for low performers.技能不足且浑然不知:低水平表现者的误校准会导致二阶判断增加。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 17;15:1252520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1252520. eCollection 2024.
7
The Dunning-Kruger effect: subjective health perceptions on smoking behavior among older Chinese adults.邓宁-克鲁格效应:中国老年人吸烟行为的主观健康感知。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):1703. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16582-y.
8
Dunning-Kruger Effect: Intuitive Errors Predict Overconfidence on the Cognitive Reflection Test.邓宁-克鲁格效应:直觉错误预示着在认知反思测试中的过度自信。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 8;12:603225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603225. eCollection 2021.
9
Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence.推理中的邓宁-克鲁格效应:未能识别无能的理论意义。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1774-1784. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7.
10
A rational model of the Dunning-Kruger effect supports insensitivity to evidence in low performers.一个理性的邓宁-克鲁格效应模型支持低表现者对证据的不敏感。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jun;5(6):756-763. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01057-0. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction to the Special Issue "Personality and Individual Differences".《“人格与个体差异”特刊引言》
J Intell. 2024 Aug 8;12(8):78. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12080078.
2
No strong support for a Dunning-Kruger effect in creativity: analyses of self-assessment in absolute and relative terms.创造力中不存在明显的邓宁-克鲁格效应:从绝对值和相对值两方面进行自我评价的分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 24;14(1):11883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61042-1.
3
Who Wants to Enhance Their Cognitive Abilities? Potential Predictors of the Acceptance of Cognitive Enhancement.

本文引用的文献

1
A rational model of the Dunning-Kruger effect supports insensitivity to evidence in low performers.一个理性的邓宁-克鲁格效应模型支持低表现者对证据的不敏感。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jun;5(6):756-763. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01057-0. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Self-insight into emotional and cognitive abilities is not related to higher adjustment.自我洞察情绪和认知能力与更高的适应能力无关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Aug;3(8):867-884. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0644-0. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
3
The Reliability and Validity of a Self-Report Measure of Cognitive Abilities in Older Adults: More Personality than Cognitive Function.
谁想要提高他们的认知能力?认知增强接受度的潜在预测因素。
J Intell. 2023 Jun 1;11(6):0. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060109.
4
The role of personality, authoritarianism and cognition in the United Kingdom's 2016 referendum on European Union membership.个性、威权主义和认知在英国2016年关于欧盟成员国身份公投中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1077354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077354. eCollection 2023.
5
The Evolution of Intelligence: Analysis of the Journal of Intelligence and Intelligence.《智力的演变:对〈智力杂志〉及智力的分析》
J Intell. 2023 Feb 14;11(2):35. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11020035.
6
Believing in one's abilities: Ability estimates as a form of beliefs.相信自身能力:作为信念形式的能力评估。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 28;13:943255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943255. eCollection 2022.
老年人认知能力自我报告测量方法的信度与效度:更多关乎个性而非认知功能。
J Intell. 2017 Dec 26;6(1):1. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6010001.
4
The self-other knowledge asymmetry in cognitive intelligence, emotional intelligence, and creativity.认知智力、情商和创造力方面的自我与他人知识不对称。
Heliyon. 2018 Dec 24;4(12):e01061. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01061. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Is accurate, positive, or inflated self-perception most advantageous for psychological adjustment? A competitive test of key hypotheses.准确、积极还是夸大的自我认知对心理调节最有利?对关键假设的竞争性检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 May;116(5):835-859. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000204. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
6
65% of Americans believe they are above average in intelligence: Results of two nationally representative surveys.65%的美国人认为自己的智力高于平均水平:两项全国代表性调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 3;13(7):e0200103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200103. eCollection 2018.
7
Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review.自我增强与心理调适:元分析综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Feb;23(1):48-72. doi: 10.1177/1088868318756467. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior.聚合及其他:行为预测中的一些基本问题。
J Pers. 1983 Sep;51(3):360-392. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00338.x.
9
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Beyond the Correlation Coefficient in Studies of Self-Assessment Accuracy: Commentary on Zell & Krizan (2014).自评准确性研究中超越相关系数:对 Zell 和 Krizan(2014)的评论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;9(2):126-30. doi: 10.1177/1745691614521244.