• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推理中的邓宁-克鲁格效应:未能识别无能的理论意义。

Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT, 06520-8205, USA.

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1774-1784. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7
PMID:28224482
Abstract

The Dunning-Kruger effect refers to the observation that the incompetent are often ill-suited to recognize their incompetence. Here we investigated potential Dunning-Kruger effects in high-level reasoning and, in particular, focused on the relative effectiveness of metacognitive monitoring among particularly biased reasoners. Participants who made the greatest numbers of errors on the cognitive reflection test (CRT) overestimated their performance on this test by a factor of more than 3. Overestimation decreased as CRT performance increased, and those who scored particularly high underestimated their performance. Evidence for this type of systematic miscalibration was also found on a self-report measure of analytic-thinking disposition. Namely, genuinely nonanalytic participants (on the basis of CRT performance) overreported their "need for cognition" (NC), indicating that they were dispositionally analytic when their objective performance indicated otherwise. Furthermore, estimated CRT performance was just as strong a predictor of NC as was actual CRT performance. Our results provide evidence for Dunning-Kruger effects both in estimated performance on the CRT and in self-reported analytic-thinking disposition. These findings indicate that part of the reason why people are biased is that they are either unaware of or indifferent to their own bias.

摘要

邓宁-克鲁格效应指的是,能力不足的人往往不适合识别自己的无能。在这里,我们研究了高水平推理中可能存在的邓宁-克鲁格效应,特别是关注了在特别有偏见的推理者中,元认知监测的相对有效性。在认知反射测试(CRT)中犯错误最多的参与者对自己在该测试中的表现的高估程度超过了 3 倍。随着 CRT 表现的提高,高估程度降低,而那些得分特别高的人则低估了自己的表现。在分析思维倾向的自我报告衡量标准上,也发现了这种类型的系统校准错误。也就是说,真正非分析性的参与者(根据 CRT 表现)过高地报告了他们的“认知需求”(NC),这表明他们在客观表现表明并非如此的情况下,在性格上是分析性的。此外,估计的 CRT 表现与实际的 CRT 表现一样,是 NC 的强有力预测指标。我们的研究结果为 CRT 上的估计绩效和自我报告的分析思维倾向中的邓宁-克鲁格效应提供了证据。这些发现表明,人们存在偏见的部分原因是他们没有意识到或对自己的偏见漠不关心。

相似文献

1
Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence.推理中的邓宁-克鲁格效应:未能识别无能的理论意义。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1774-1784. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7.
2
Dunning-Kruger Effect: Intuitive Errors Predict Overconfidence on the Cognitive Reflection Test.邓宁-克鲁格效应:直觉错误预示着在认知反思测试中的过度自信。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 8;12:603225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603225. eCollection 2021.
3
No strong support for a Dunning-Kruger effect in creativity: analyses of self-assessment in absolute and relative terms.创造力中不存在明显的邓宁-克鲁格效应:从绝对值和相对值两方面进行自我评价的分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 24;14(1):11883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61042-1.
4
Dunning-Kruger effects in face perception.面孔知觉中的邓宁-克鲁格效应。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104345. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104345. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
5
Less-Intelligent and Unaware? Accuracy and Dunning-Kruger Effects for Self-Estimates of Different Aspects of Intelligence.不太聪明且不自知?智力不同方面自我评估的准确性及邓宁-克鲁格效应
J Intell. 2022 Feb 5;10(1):10. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10010010.
6
The humble estimate: Humility predicts higher self-assessment accuracy.谦逊的估计:谦逊预示着更高的自我评估准确性。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62(1):561-582. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12545. Epub 2022 May 6.
7
The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking.答案流畅度和知觉流畅度作为启发分析思维的元认知线索的作用。
Cognition. 2013 Aug;128(2):237-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.012. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
8
Unskilled and optimistic: overconfident predictions despite calibrated knowledge of relative skill.不熟练且乐观:尽管对相对技能有校准的了解,但仍做出过于自信的预测。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):601-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0379-2.
9
Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?认知反思测试是对反思和直觉的一种衡量手段吗?
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):341-8. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1.
10
Wise up: Clarifying the role of metacognition in the Dunning-Kruger effect.明智之举:澄清元认知在邓宁-克鲁格效应中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Nov;148(11):1882-1897. doi: 10.1037/xge0000579. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic memory and creative evaluation.语义记忆与创造性评估。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 24;13(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03124-x.
2
Automatic engagement estimation in smart education/learning settings: a systematic review of engagement definitions, datasets, and methods.智能教育/学习环境中的自动参与度评估:参与度定义、数据集和方法的系统综述
Smart Learn Environ. 2022;9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00212-y. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
3
Antecedents of Deviant Behavior: Psychological and Non-Psychological Factors and Ethical Justifications.

本文引用的文献

1
The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test.认知反射测验中的冲突时间进程。
Cognition. 2016 May;150:109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
2
Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making.评论:决策中的认知反思与计算
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 22;7:9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009. eCollection 2016.
3
The Doubting System 1: Evidence for automatic substitution sensitivity.怀疑系统1:自动替代敏感性的证据。
异常行为的前因:心理与非心理因素及伦理依据
Empl Responsib Rights J (Dordr). 2022;34(2):169-191. doi: 10.1007/s10672-021-09387-x. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
4
Primus inter pares effect in high schools.在高中里的“平等中的首席”效应。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 11;15:1382062. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382062. eCollection 2024.
5
Unskilled and unaware: second-order judgments increase with miscalibration for low performers.技能不足且浑然不知:低水平表现者的误校准会导致二阶判断增加。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 17;15:1252520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1252520. eCollection 2024.
6
Divergence between confidence and knowledge of endodontists regarding non-odontogenic pain.牙髓病学家对非牙源性疼痛的信心与知识之间的差异。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2023 Oct 9;31:e20230222. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0222. eCollection 2023.
7
The Dunning-Kruger effect: subjective health perceptions on smoking behavior among older Chinese adults.邓宁-克鲁格效应:中国老年人吸烟行为的主观健康感知。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):1703. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16582-y.
8
Overconfidence in the Cognitive Reflection Test: Comparing Confidence Resolution for Reasoning vs. General Knowledge.认知反思测试中的过度自信:比较推理与常识的信心分辨率
J Intell. 2023 Apr 27;11(5):81. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050081.
9
Developing Medication Review Competency in Undergraduate Pharmacy Training: A Self-Assessment by Third-Year Students.发展本科生药学培训中的药物审查能力:三年级学生的自我评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065079.
10
Evaluation of the Dunning-Kruger Effects among Dental Students at an Academic Training Institution in UAE.阿联酋一所学术培训机构牙科学生中的邓宁-克鲁格效应评估。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022 Sep;56(3):299-310. doi: 10.15644/asc56/3/8.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Feb;164:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.12.008. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
4
When Knowledge Knows No Bounds: Self-Perceived Expertise Predicts Claims of Impossible Knowledge.当知识没有边界时:自我认知的专业知识预示着对不可能知识的宣称。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1295-303. doi: 10.1177/0956797615588195. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
5
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.双重加工理论的高阶认知:推进辩论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):223-41. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685.
6
Bias and Conflict: A Case for Logical Intuitions.偏见与冲突:逻辑直觉的案例。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan;7(1):28-38. doi: 10.1177/1745691611429354. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
7
What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement.是什么让我们思考?一种分析参与的三阶段双过程模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Aug;80:34-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
8
Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?认知反思测试是对反思和直觉的一种衡量手段吗?
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):341-8. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1.
9
Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning: an event-related potential study of belief bias.推理中的启发式与分析式过程:信念偏差的事件相关电位研究
Psychophysiology. 2014 Mar;51(3):290-7. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12169.
10
The metacognitive advantage of deliberative thinkers: a dual-process perspective on overconfidence.深思熟虑型思考者的元认知优势:过度自信的双过程视角
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Sep;105(3):353-73. doi: 10.1037/a0033640. Epub 2013 Jul 29.