• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

被动采集的唾液(无需用力咳嗽)是否能灵敏地检测到门诊患者中的 SARS-CoV-2?一项系统评价。

Is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory cases? A systematic review.

机构信息

Clinical Assistant Professor of Dentistry, Division of Biomedical Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA..

Clinical Assistant Professor of Dentistry, Division of Biomedical Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022 May;133(5):530-538. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2022.01.002
PMID:35227640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8743389/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review was conducted to assess the sensitivity rate of SARS-CoV-2 detection in the saliva of ambulatory asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients, with saliva being collected passively without any forceful coughing.

STUDY DESIGN

A literature search was performed from January 2020 to July 2021. Prospective studies excluding letters to editors were included in our review only if saliva and nasopharyngeal samples were collected simultaneously and sensitivity was reported using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ambulatory cases.

RESULTS

A total of 436 studies were assessed; 10 (4 cohorts and 6 cross-sectional) studies met our inclusion criteria. The sensitivity rate of saliva to detect SARS-CoV-2 varied from 85.7% to 98.6% in all except for 3 studies. Lower sensitivity levels were attributed to low viral load (51.9% and 63.8%) or lack of supervision while collecting saliva (66.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Passively collected saliva in the absence of coughing has a high sensitivity rate to detect SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients compared with nasopharyngeal swabs. Limitations of previous studies, such as lack of attention to the method of saliva collection, stages, and severity of the disease at the time of sample collection, can be researched in future investigations.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在评估在无症状和轻度症状的门诊患者的唾液中检测 SARS-CoV-2 的灵敏度,采集唾液时无需强力咳嗽。

研究设计

我们进行了一次文献检索,时间范围为 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月。只有当同时采集唾液和鼻咽样本,并且使用逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)在无症状或轻度症状的门诊病例中报告灵敏度时,我们才会将排除信件的前瞻性研究纳入本综述。

结果

共评估了 436 项研究,其中 10 项(4 项队列研究和 6 项横断面研究)符合我们的纳入标准。除了 3 项研究外,唾液检测 SARS-CoV-2 的灵敏度率在所有研究中从 85.7%到 98.6%不等。较低的灵敏度水平归因于病毒载量较低(51.9%和 63.8%)或在采集唾液时缺乏监督(66.7%)。

结论

与鼻咽拭子相比,在无症状和轻度症状患者中,无需咳嗽即可采集的被动唾液对 SARS-CoV-2 的检测具有较高的灵敏度。未来的研究可以研究以前研究的局限性,例如对唾液采集方法、采集样本时的疾病阶段和严重程度缺乏关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3852/8743389/ceb5db91c92a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3852/8743389/e92fd86bc0ba/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3852/8743389/ceb5db91c92a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3852/8743389/e92fd86bc0ba/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3852/8743389/ceb5db91c92a/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Is saliva collected passively without forceful coughing sensitive to detect SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory cases? A systematic review.被动采集的唾液(无需用力咳嗽)是否能灵敏地检测到门诊患者中的 SARS-CoV-2?一项系统评价。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022 May;133(5):530-538. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
2
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
5
Nirmatrelvir combined with ritonavir for preventing and treating COVID-19.奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片组合包装用于 COVID-19 的预防和治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 20;9(9):CD015395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015395.pub2.
6
Are saliva and deep throat sputum as reliable as common respiratory specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection? A systematic review and meta-analysis.唾液和深咳痰液与常见呼吸道标本检测 SARS-CoV-2 的可靠性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Sep;49(9):1165-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于 COVID-19 诊断的胸部影像学检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 16;5(5):CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub5.
8
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral positivity and their burden in saliva of asymptomatic carriers - a systematic review and meta-analysis.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)在无症状感染者唾液中的病毒阳性率及其负担:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2022 Apr;80(3):182-190. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2021.1977385. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
9
Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.唾液、咽拭子和鼻拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02881-20.
10
SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19.用于治疗 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2 中和单克隆抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 2;9(9):CD013825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013825.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Generation of recombinant viruses directly from clinical specimens of COVID-19 patients.直接从 COVID-19 患者的临床标本中生成重组病毒。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Jul 16;62(7):e0004224. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00042-24. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Recent advances in RNA sample preparation techniques for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva and gargle.用于检测唾液和漱口液中SARS-CoV-2的RNA样本制备技术的最新进展。
Trends Analyt Chem. 2023 Aug;165:117107. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.117107. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
Parents' and Childcare Workers' Perspectives Toward SARS-CoV-2 Test and Surveillance Protocols in Pre-school Children Day Care Centers: A Qualitative Study Within the German Wü-KiTa-CoV Project.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing for COVID-19 in dental offices: Mechanism of action, application, and interpretation of laboratory and point-of-care screening tests.牙科诊室中 COVID-19 的检测:实验室和即时检测筛查试验的作用机制、应用和解读。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Jul;152(7):514-525.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.04.019. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Screening for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: Saliva or nasopharyngeal swab? Rapid review and meta-analysis.RT-PCR 法筛查 SARS-CoV-2:唾液还是鼻咽拭子?快速综述和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0253007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253007. eCollection 2021.
3
The diagnostic accuracy of saliva testing for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
家长和儿童保育员对学龄前儿童日托中心新冠病毒检测及监测方案的看法:德国Wü-KiTa-CoV项目中的一项定性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 29;9:897726. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.897726. eCollection 2022.
4
The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic on oral medicine practice.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对口腔医学实践的影响。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022 Jul;134(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
唾液检测 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oral Dis. 2022 Nov;28 Suppl 2:2347-2361. doi: 10.1111/odi.13934. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
4
What is the rate of COVID-19 infection in a population seeking oral health care?在寻求口腔保健的人群中,COVID-19 感染率是多少?
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Jun;152(6):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
5
Effective screening strategies for detection of asymptomatic COVID-19 travelers at airport quarantine stations: Exploratory findings in Japan.机场检疫站检测无症状新冠病毒旅行者的有效筛查策略:日本的探索性研究结果
Glob Health Med. 2021 Apr 30;3(2):107-111. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2020.01109.
6
Saliva as a gold-standard sample for SARS-CoV-2 detection.唾液作为严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测的金标准样本。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jun;9(6):562-564. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00178-8. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
7
Comparison of viral load between saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV2: the role of days of symptoms onset on diagnosis.比较 SARS-CoV2 病毒在唾液和鼻咽拭子中的载量:发病天数对诊断的影响。
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2021 Apr 16;116:e210018. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760210018. eCollection 2021.
8
Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同采样方法在 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测中的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1233-1245. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00146-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
SARS-CoV-2 Positivity in Asymptomatic-Screened Dental Patients.无症状筛查牙科患者中的 SARS-CoV-2 阳性。
J Dent Res. 2021 Jun;100(6):583-590. doi: 10.1177/00220345211004849. Epub 2021 Mar 29.