Jennifer B. Seaman is an assistant professor of nursing, Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kimberly J. Rak is a medical anthropologist, CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Mar 1;31(2):129-136. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022719.
Although proactive interprofessional family meetings are widely recommended as a best practice for patient- and family-centered care in intensive care units (ICUs), adherence to this recommendation is low.
To enhance understanding of practices, barriers, and facilitators related to the conduct of family meetings from the perspective of ICU clinicians and to elicit clinicians' ideas and opinions about strategies to achieve proactive interprofessional family meetings.
Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with ICU clinicians who were purposively selected from among a national sample. Constant comparative analysis was used to generate a matrix of themes; enrollment ceased when no new ideas emerged.
Interviews were conducted with 14 participants (10 nurses, 3 physicians, and 1 care manager). Rather than having a protocol for proactive family meetings, participants primarily held family meetings when physicians thought that it was time to discuss a transition to comfort-focused care. Other barriers included clinicians' discomfort with end-of-life conversations, physicians' time constraints, and nurses' competing clinical responsibilities. Facilitators included physicians' skill and comfort with difficult conversations, advocacy for family meetings from care managers/ social workers, and having full-time intensivists. Participants offered/endorsed multiple intervention ideas, including scheduling preemptively, monitoring unit performance, and adding discussion of a family meeting to daily rounds.
A key barrier to proactive family meetings is the mindset that family meetings need occur only when a clinical decision must be made, rather than proactively to support and engage families. Clinicians suggested ways to make proactive family meetings routine.
尽管主动开展跨专业的家庭会议被广泛推荐为重症监护病房(ICU)以患者和家庭为中心的护理的最佳实践,但对这一建议的遵循程度较低。
从 ICU 临床医生的角度了解与开展家庭会议相关的实践、障碍和促进因素,并了解临床医生对实现主动跨专业家庭会议的策略的想法和意见。
对 ICU 临床医生进行半结构化电话访谈,这些临床医生是从全国样本中有意选择的。使用恒定性比较分析生成主题矩阵;当没有新的想法出现时, enrolment 就停止了。
对 14 名参与者(10 名护士、3 名医生和 1 名护理经理)进行了访谈。参与者主要在医生认为是时候讨论向以舒适为中心的护理过渡时才举行家庭会议,而不是有一个主动开展家庭会议的方案。其他障碍包括临床医生对临终谈话的不适、医生的时间限制以及护士的临床职责竞争。促进因素包括医生进行困难对话的技能和舒适度、护理经理/社会工作者对家庭会议的倡导以及有全职的重症监护医生。参与者提出/认可了多种干预措施的想法,包括预先安排、监测单位绩效以及在日常查房中增加家庭会议的讨论。
主动开展家庭会议的一个主要障碍是一种心态,即家庭会议只有在必须做出临床决策时才需要举行,而不是主动支持和参与家庭。临床医生提出了使主动家庭会议成为常规的方法。