• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会人口学因素、健康素养和痴呆症体验如何影响照顾者对痴呆症的认知?

How do factors of sociodemographic, health literacy and dementia experience influence carers' knowledge of dementia?

机构信息

Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, 325312UCL, London, UK.

Division of Psychiatry, 4919UCL, London, UK.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2022 May;21(4):1270-1288. doi: 10.1177/14713012221074219. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1177/14713012221074219
PMID:35234067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9109238/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dementia is a life limiting disease following a progressive trajectory. As carers often become key decision makers, their knowledge of dementia will have health implications for the person living with dementia as well as carer's psychological wellbeing.

AIM

To explore how sociodemographic factors, health literacy and dementia experience influence family carers knowledge about dementia.

METHOD

In this cross-sectional, mixed methods study, we interviewed 150 family carers and assessed their dementia knowledge using the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale (DKAS). Linear regression analyses were used to examine whether health literacy, previous experiences of dementia, support group attendance and sociodemographic characteristics predicted knowledge. Sixteen carers also completed qualitative interviews which explored unmet information needs. Transcripts and field notes were thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Most participants were partners (47%) or adult children (48%) and cared for someone with severe (32%) or moderate (43%) dementia. Mean DKAS scores were 34.8/50 (SD = 7.0, range = 17-48) reflecting 8/25 incorrect answers. Backwards elimination regression found greater dementia knowledge was associated with greater health literacy for appraising information (coef 3.48, 95% CI (1.38, 5.58); = 0.001) and more years of education (coef 0.39, 95% CI (0.12, 0.65); = 0.004). Although not significant, knowledge was slightly lower in those who attended a support group, and a trend was found between ability to understand health information and knowledge. Only 39% accurately identified dementia as life shortening, indicating notable gaps in knowledge. Four qualitative themes were identified; arm yourself with information, ability to steer through information, other experience of dementia can be helpful and the importance of relationships with health care professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

In an information age, vast amounts of information are available, but this can bring difficulties. Carers with more years of education and higher health literacy knew more about dementia. Professionals should consider how carers with lower health literacy can be supported through provision of timely, relevant information.

摘要

背景

痴呆症是一种呈进行性轨迹的危及生命的疾病。由于照顾者通常成为关键决策者,他们对痴呆症的了解将对患有痴呆症的人以及照顾者的心理健康产生健康影响。

目的

探讨社会人口因素、健康素养和痴呆症经历如何影响家庭照顾者对痴呆症的认识。

方法

在这项横断面、混合方法研究中,我们采访了 150 名家庭照顾者,并使用痴呆症知识评估量表(DKAS)评估了他们的痴呆症知识。线性回归分析用于检查健康素养、以前的痴呆症经历、参加支持小组以及社会人口特征是否预测知识。16 名照顾者还完成了定性访谈,探讨了未满足的信息需求。对转录本和现场记录进行了主题分析。

结果

大多数参与者是伴侣(47%)或成年子女(48%),照顾患有严重(32%)或中度(43%)痴呆症的人。平均 DKAS 得分为 34.8/50(SD=7.0,范围为 17-48),反映出 17-25 个错误答案。向后消除回归发现,更高的痴呆症知识与更高的信息评估健康素养(系数 3.48,95%置信区间(1.38,5.58);p=0.001)和更高的教育年限(系数 0.39,95%置信区间(0.12,0.65);p=0.004)相关。尽管不显著,但参加支持小组的人知识略低,并且在理解健康信息的能力和知识之间存在趋势。只有 39%的人准确地将痴呆症识别为缩短寿命,表明知识存在明显差距。确定了四个定性主题;武装自己的信息,驾驭信息的能力,其他的痴呆症经历可能会有所帮助,以及与医疗保健专业人员的关系的重要性。

结论

在信息时代,大量信息可用,但这可能会带来困难。受教育年限更长和健康素养更高的照顾者对痴呆症的了解更多。专业人员应考虑如何通过及时提供相关信息来支持健康素养较低的照顾者。

相似文献

1
How do factors of sociodemographic, health literacy and dementia experience influence carers' knowledge of dementia?社会人口学因素、健康素养和痴呆症体验如何影响照顾者对痴呆症的认知?
Dementia (London). 2022 May;21(4):1270-1288. doi: 10.1177/14713012221074219. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
2
Is health literacy of family carers associated with carer burden, quality of life, and time spent on informal care for older persons living with dementia?家庭护理者的健康素养是否与照顾者负担、生活质量以及为痴呆症老年患者提供非正式护理所花费的时间有关?
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 20;15(11):e0241982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241982. eCollection 2020.
3
Experiences of end of life amongst family carers of people with advanced dementia: longitudinal cohort study with mixed methods.晚期痴呆症患者家庭照料者的临终体验:采用混合方法的纵向队列研究
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0523-3.
4
The experiences and preparedness of family carers for best interest decision-making of a relative living with advanced dementia: A qualitative study.有高级认知障碍的亲属的家庭照顾者在最佳利益决策方面的经验和准备情况:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jul;74(7):1595-1604. doi: 10.1111/jan.13576. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
5
Practical and emotional preparation for death: A mixed methods study investigating experiences of family carers of people with dementia.为死亡做实际和情感上的准备:一项混合方法研究,调查痴呆症患者家属的体验。
Dementia (London). 2022 Apr;21(3):934-956. doi: 10.1177/14713012211066674. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
6
A qualitative study of carers' experiences of dementia cafés: a place to feel supported and be yourself.一项关于痴呆症咖啡馆照顾者体验的定性研究:一个能让人感到被支持并做自己的地方。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jul 25;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0559-4.
7
Prevalence and type of unmet needs experienced by carers of people living with dementia.痴呆患者照顾者未满足需求的发生率和类型。
Aging Ment Health. 2023 May;27(5):904-910. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2053833. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
8
A qualitative exploration of family carer's understandings of people with dementia's expectations for the future.对痴呆症患者家属对未来期望的理解进行定性探索。
Dementia (London). 2021 May;20(4):1284-1299. doi: 10.1177/1471301220929543. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
The Association of Health Literacy and Electronic Health Literacy With Self-Efficacy, Coping, and Caregiving Perceptions Among Carers of People With Dementia: Research Protocol for a Descriptive Correlational Study.痴呆症患者照料者的健康素养和电子健康素养与自我效能感、应对方式及照料认知之间的关联:一项描述性相关性研究的研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Nov 13;6(11):e221. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8080.
10
Caregiver and care recipient health literacy, social support and connectedness on caregiver psychological morbidity: A cross-sectional dyad survey.照顾者和被照顾者的健康素养、社会支持和照顾者心理病态的联系:一项横断面双体调查。
Psychooncology. 2023 Aug;32(8):1257-1267. doi: 10.1002/pon.6177. Epub 2023 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of the individualized coordination and empowerment for care partners of persons with dementia (ICECaP) intervention: impact on preparedness for caregiving.痴呆症患者护理伙伴个性化协调与赋权(ICECaP)干预的随机临床试验:对护理准备的影响
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Mar 1;37(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-02959-z.
2
Establishing a unified global framework for studying dementia knowledge: insights from a narrative review.建立一个统一的全球痴呆症知识研究框架:叙事综述的见解
Arch Public Health. 2024 Dec 23;82(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01476-1.
3
Designing an mHealth application for informal carers concerning the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a need analysis survey.设计一款针对非专业照护者的移动医疗应用程序,用于管理痴呆患者的行为和心理症状:需求分析调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):930. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11273-9.
4
[Digital information materials on dementia-an exploratory content analysis].[关于痴呆症的数字信息材料——一项探索性内容分析]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Aug;67(8):947-955. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03893-7. Epub 2024 May 28.
5
Investigating the Readability and Linguistic, Psychological, and Emotional Characteristics of Digital Dementia Information Written in the English Language: Multitrait-Multimethod Text Analysis.探究用英语撰写的数字痴呆症信息的可读性以及语言、心理和情感特征:多特质多方法文本分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Oct 25;7:e48143. doi: 10.2196/48143.
6
The intersection of social determinants of health and family care of people living with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: A public health opportunity.健康的社会决定因素与阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症患者家庭护理的交集:公共卫生的机遇。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Dec;19(12):5837-5846. doi: 10.1002/alz.13437. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
7
Senile dementia and psychiatric stigma among community health service providers and relatives of diagnosed and suspected dementia patients: a cross-sectional study.社区卫生服务提供者和确诊及疑似痴呆症患者家属的老年痴呆症和精神疾病污名:一项横断面研究。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 11;11:e14613. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14613. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Building dementia knowledge globally through the Understanding Dementia Massive Open Online Course (MOOC).通过“了解痴呆症”大规模在线开放课程(MOOC)在全球范围内普及痴呆症知识。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2019 Apr 10;4:3. doi: 10.1038/s41539-019-0042-4. eCollection 2019.
2
Do interventions that include education on dementia progression improve knowledge, mental health and burden of family carers? A systematic review.包含痴呆症进展教育的干预措施是否能提高家庭护理人员的知识水平、心理健康状况并减轻其负担?一项系统评价。
Dementia (London). 2020 Nov;19(8):2555-2581. doi: 10.1177/1471301219831530. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
3
The experiences and preparedness of family carers for best interest decision-making of a relative living with advanced dementia: A qualitative study.有高级认知障碍的亲属的家庭照顾者在最佳利益决策方面的经验和准备情况:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jul;74(7):1595-1604. doi: 10.1111/jan.13576. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
4
Dementia knowledge assessment scale (DKAS): confirmatory factor analysis and comparative subscale scores among an international cohort.痴呆知识评估量表(DKAS):国际队列中的验证性因素分析及比较子量表得分
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jul 31;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0552-y.
5
Five myths about variable selection.关于变量选择的五个误区。
Transpl Int. 2017 Jan;30(1):6-10. doi: 10.1111/tri.12895.
6
Japanese-language Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale: Psychometric performance, and health student and professional understanding.日本语痴呆症知识评估量表:心理测量性能,以及卫生专业学生和专业人员的理解。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Oct;17(10):1746-1751. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12911. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
7
Knowledge of Dementia: Do family members understand dementia as a terminal condition?对痴呆症的认知:家庭成员是否将痴呆症视为一种晚期病症?
Dementia (London). 2017 Jul;16(5):556-575. doi: 10.1177/1471301215605630. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
8
A systematic review of the public's knowledge and understanding of Alzheimer's disease and dementia.关于公众对阿尔茨海默病和痴呆症的认识与理解的系统综述。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2015 Jul-Sep;29(3):255-75. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000102.
9
A mismatch between population health literacy and the complexity of health information: an observational study.人群健康素养与健康信息复杂性之间的不匹配:一项观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jun;65(635):e379-86. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X685285.
10
Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU).欧洲的健康素养:欧洲健康素养调查(HLS-EU)的比较结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):1053-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv043. Epub 2015 Apr 5.