Moore Kirsten J, Lee Cheuk Yan, Sampson Elizabeth L, Candy Bridget
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; North Middlesex University Hospital Mental Health Liaison Team, Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, London, UK.
Dementia (London). 2020 Nov;19(8):2555-2581. doi: 10.1177/1471301219831530. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
The European Association of Palliative Care recommends that family carers need education on the progression of dementia. This systematic review aimed to explore whether interventions incorporating education regarding the progressive nature of dementia increased carers' understanding of dementia and improved mental health and burden.
MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched to April 2018. Randomised controlled trials with samples of family carers of someone with dementia were eligible. Included interventions involved a component aimed to increase the carer's understanding of the progression of dementia. Outcomes of interest included: knowledge of dementia, depression, burden and pre-death grief.
Searches identified 3221 unique citations of which 11 studies were eligible for review. Interventions ranged from 4 to 16 sessions of which 1 to 3 sessions focused on the progression of dementia. : Two studies evaluated carers' knowledge of dementia. One found no difference between the trial arms immediately after the intervention or three months later. The second found a significant intervention effect at the end of the intervention but not at three-month follow-up. Seven studies evaluated intervention effects on depression. Meta-analysis of three trials showed significant differences in mean follow-up scores favouring intervention over control. The remaining four studies did not show differences in depression between intervention and control groups. : Nine studies evaluated burden and were examined in two meta-analyses (mean scores at follow-up and mean change scores from baseline to follow-up), neither of which found a benefit for intervention over control. Using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation system, we judged the quality of evidence to be very low for depression and low for burden, knowledge and pre-death grief, reducing our confidence in any of the effect estimates.
The evidence was not sufficient to support or refute the effectiveness of education on progression of dementia on carers' knowledge and mental health.
欧洲姑息治疗协会建议,家庭护理人员需要接受有关痴呆症进展的教育。本系统评价旨在探讨纳入有关痴呆症渐进性教育的干预措施是否能提高护理人员对痴呆症的理解,并改善其心理健康和负担。
检索截至2018年4月的MEDLINE、PsycINFO和CINAHL数据库。纳入以痴呆症患者的家庭护理人员为样本的随机对照试验。纳入的干预措施包括旨在提高护理人员对痴呆症进展理解的部分。感兴趣的结局包括:痴呆症知识、抑郁、负担和临终前悲伤。
检索共识别出3221条独特引文,其中11项研究符合纳入综述的标准。干预措施从4次到16次不等,其中1至3次聚焦于痴呆症的进展。两项研究评估了护理人员对痴呆症的知识。一项研究发现干预后即刻或三个月后试验组之间没有差异。第二项研究发现干预结束时有显著的干预效果,但在三个月随访时没有。七项研究评估了干预对抑郁的影响。三项试验的荟萃分析显示,随访平均得分在干预组和对照组之间存在显著差异,干预组更优。其余四项研究未显示干预组和对照组在抑郁方面存在差异。九项研究评估了负担,并在两项荟萃分析中进行了检验(随访时的平均得分以及从基线到随访的平均变化得分),均未发现干预组比对照组有优势。使用推荐意见分级评估、制定与评价系统,我们判定抑郁方面的证据质量极低,负担、知识和临终前悲伤方面的证据质量低,这降低了我们对任何效应估计值的信心。
证据不足以支持或反驳关于痴呆症进展的教育对护理人员知识和心理健康的有效性。