The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Apr 1;127(4):829-839. doi: 10.1152/jn.00319.2021. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
Actions involving fine control of the hand, for example, grasping an object, rely heavily on sensory information from the fingertips. Although the integration of feedback during the execution of individual movements is well understood, less is known about the use of sensory feedback in the control of skilled movement sequences. To address this gap, we trained participants to produce sequences of finger movements on a keyboard-like device over a 4-day training period. Participants received haptic, visual, and auditory feedback indicating the occurrence of each finger press. We then either transiently delayed or advanced the feedback for a single press by a small amount of time (30 or 60 ms). We observed that participants rapidly adjusted their ongoing finger press by either accelerating or prolonging the ongoing press, in accordance with the direction of the perturbation. Furthermore, we could show that this rapid behavioral modulation was driven by haptic feedback. Although these feedback-driven adjustments reduced in size with practice, they were still clearly present at the end of training. In contrast to the directionally specific effect we observed on the perturbed press, a feedback perturbation resulted in a delayed onset of the subsequent presses irrespective of perturbation direction or feedback modality. This observation is consistent with a hierarchical organization of even very skilled and fast movement sequences, with different levels reacting distinctly to sensory perturbations. Sensory feedback is important during the execution of a movement. However, little is known about how sensory feedback is used during the production of movement sequences. Here, we show two distinct feedback processes in the execution of fast finger movement sequences. By transiently delaying or advancing the feedback of a single press within a sequence, we observed a directionally specific effect on the perturbed press and a directionally non-specific effect on the subsequent presses.
涉及手部精细控制的动作,例如抓握物体,严重依赖于指尖的感觉信息。尽管单个运动执行过程中的反馈整合已经得到很好的理解,但对于在熟练运动序列控制中使用感觉反馈的了解较少。为了解决这一差距,我们在 4 天的训练期间培训参与者在类似键盘的设备上产生手指运动序列。参与者收到触觉、视觉和听觉反馈,指示每次手指按压的发生。然后,我们通过少量时间(30 或 60 毫秒)暂时延迟或提前单个按压的反馈。我们观察到参与者根据扰动的方向,通过加速或延长正在进行的按压来快速调整正在进行的手指按压。此外,我们可以证明这种快速的行为调节是由触觉反馈驱动的。尽管这些反馈驱动的调整随着练习而减小,但在训练结束时仍明显存在。与我们在受扰按压上观察到的方向特异性效应相反,无论扰动方向或反馈模式如何,反馈扰动都会导致后续按压的起始延迟。这一观察结果与即使是非常熟练和快速的运动序列的分层组织一致,不同的层次对感觉扰动有明显的反应。感觉反馈在运动执行过程中很重要。然而,对于在运动序列产生过程中如何使用感觉反馈,我们知之甚少。在这里,我们在快速手指运动序列的执行中展示了两个不同的反馈过程。通过在序列中的单个按压的反馈中暂时延迟或提前,我们观察到在受扰按压上的方向特异性效应和在随后的按压上的方向非特异性效应。