Muri Raphaela, Trippel Mafalda, Borner Urs, Weidner Sabine, Trepp Roman
Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Thyroid. 2022 Jun;32(6):667-674. doi: 10.1089/thy.2021.0551. Epub 2022 May 20.
Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the preferred method to evaluate the dignity of thyroid nodules. Nevertheless, the often-reported high nondiagnostic rate burdens affected patients and the health care system. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) constitutes an addition to the thyroid FNA procedure, with various studies showing its beneficial effect on the Bethesda I nondiagnostic rate. We aimed to assess whether ROSE may reduce the rate of Bethesda categories III and V. Additionally, we examined the influence of ROSE on specimen quality. We performed a retrospective cohort study, comparing Bethesda categorization and specimen quality in specimens subject to ROSE compared with those not subject to ROSE. We also evaluated aspects of specimen quality that differed according to the use of ROSE. We subcategorized Bethesda I into insufficient cellularity or artifacts, and Bethesda categories III and V into cellular without artifacts, sparsely cellular, or artifacts. We evaluated 5030 thyroid FNAs. ROSE was performed in 1304 (25.9%) cases, and ROSE was not utilized for 3726 (74.1%) specimens. The rate of Bethesda I nondiagnostic and Bethesda III categories was reduced in specimens subject to ROSE (4.3%, 56/1304) compared with non-ROSE (39.9%, 1487/3726, < 0.001). The rate of both benign Bethesda II and malignant Bethesda VI diagnoses was 91.6% (1194/1270) in ROSE specimens compared with 56.6% (1999/3530) in non-ROSE ( < 0.001). This was reflected by a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy with ROSE (areas under the curve [AUC] = 0.811, AUC = 0.895, = 0.004). The overall rate of specimens flawed by sparse cellularity in Bethesda categories III and V was 0.1% (1/1304) in ROSE specimens compared with 1.2% (45/3726) in non-ROSE ( < 0.001). The overall artifact rate was 0.3% (4/1304) for ROSE specimens and 2.5% (92/3726) for non-ROSE ( < 0.001). ROSE significantly increased diagnostic accuracy by improving FNA specimens quantitatively and qualitatively. We suggest considering ROSE as standard of care for thyroid FNAs.
超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(FNA)是评估甲状腺结节性质的首选方法。然而,经常报道的高非诊断率给患者和医疗系统带来了负担。快速现场评估(ROSE)是甲状腺FNA程序的一项补充,多项研究表明其对贝塞斯达I类非诊断率有有益影响。我们旨在评估ROSE是否可以降低贝塞斯达III类和V类的比例。此外,我们研究了ROSE对标本质量的影响。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了接受ROSE的标本与未接受ROSE的标本的贝塞斯达分类和标本质量。我们还评估了根据ROSE的使用情况而有所不同的标本质量方面。我们将贝塞斯达I类细分为细胞数量不足或有伪像,将贝塞斯达III类和V类细分为无伪像的细胞、细胞稀少或有伪像。我们评估了5030例甲状腺FNA。1304例(25.9%)进行了ROSE,3726例(74.1%)标本未使用ROSE。与未进行ROSE的标本(39.9%,1487/3726,<0.001)相比,进行ROSE的标本中贝塞斯达I类非诊断和贝塞斯达III类的比例降低(4.3%,56/1304)。进行ROSE的标本中良性贝塞斯达II类和恶性贝塞斯达VI类诊断的比例均为91.6%(1194/1270),而未进行ROSE的标本中为56.6%(1999/3530)(<0.001)。这反映在ROSE的诊断准确性有显著提高(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.811,AUC=0.895,P=0.004)。在贝塞斯达III类和V类中,细胞稀少导致标本有缺陷的总体比例在进行ROSE的标本中为0.1%(1/1304),而在未进行ROSE的标本中为1.2%(45/3726)(<0.001)。进行ROSE的标本总体伪像率为0.3%(4/1304),未进行ROSE的标本为2.5%(92/3726)(<0.001)。ROSE通过在数量和质量上改善FNA标本显著提高了诊断准确性。我们建议将ROSE视为甲状腺FNA的护理标准。