• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估从非概率样本估计的回归系数中的选择偏差及其在遗传学和人口调查中的应用。

ASSESSING SELECTION BIAS IN REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS ESTIMATED FROM NONPROBABILITY SAMPLES WITH APPLICATIONS TO GENETICS AND DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEYS.

作者信息

West Brady T, Little Roderick J, Andridge Rebecca R, Boonstra Philip S, Ware Erin B, Pandit Anita, Alvarado-Leiton Fernanda

机构信息

Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan.

出版信息

Ann Appl Stat. 2021 Sep;15(3):1556-1581. doi: 10.1214/21-aoas1453. Epub 2021 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1214/21-aoas1453
PMID:35237377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8887878/
Abstract

Selection bias is a serious potential problem for inference about relationships of scientific interest based on samples without well-defined probability sampling mechanisms. Motivated by the potential for selection bias in: (a) estimated relationships of polygenic scores (PGSs) with phenotypes in genetic studies of volunteers and (b) estimated differences in subgroup means in surveys of smartphone users, we derive novel measures of selection bias for estimates of the coefficients in linear and probit regression models fitted to nonprobability samples, when aggregate-level auxiliary data are available for the selected sample and the target population. The measures arise from normal pattern-mixture models that allow analysts to examine the sensitivity of their inferences to assumptions about nonignorable selection in these samples. We examine the effectiveness of the proposed measures in a simulation study and then use them to quantify the selection bias in: (a) estimated PGS-phenotype relationships in a large study of volunteers recruited via Facebook and (b) estimated subgroup differences in mean past-year employment duration in a nonprobability sample of low-educated smartphone users. We evaluate the performance of the measures in these applications using benchmark estimates from large probability samples.

摘要

对于基于没有明确概率抽样机制的样本推断科学研究感兴趣的关系而言,选择偏倚是一个严重的潜在问题。鉴于在以下两方面存在选择偏倚的可能性:(a)在志愿者基因研究中多基因分数(PGS)与表型的估计关系;(b)在智能手机用户调查中估计的亚组均值差异,我们推导出了适用于拟合非概率样本的线性和概率回归模型系数估计的新型选择偏倚度量方法,前提是所选样本和目标人群可获取总体水平的辅助数据。这些度量方法源自正态模式混合模型,使分析人员能够检验其推断对这些样本中不可忽略选择假设的敏感性。我们在模拟研究中检验了所提度量方法的有效性,然后用它们来量化以下两方面的选择偏倚:(a)在一项通过脸书招募志愿者的大型研究中估计的PGS-表型关系;(b)在低学历智能手机用户非概率样本中估计的过去一年平均就业时长的亚组差异。我们使用来自大概率样本的基准估计来评估这些应用中度量方法的性能。

相似文献

1
ASSESSING SELECTION BIAS IN REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS ESTIMATED FROM NONPROBABILITY SAMPLES WITH APPLICATIONS TO GENETICS AND DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEYS.评估从非概率样本估计的回归系数中的选择偏差及其在遗传学和人口调查中的应用。
Ann Appl Stat. 2021 Sep;15(3):1556-1581. doi: 10.1214/21-aoas1453. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Measures of the Degree of Departure from Ignorable Sample Selection.偏离可忽略样本选择程度的度量
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Nov;8(5):932-964. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smz023. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
4
Adjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer-based epidemiologic cohorts.基于非概率志愿者流行病学队列进行人群推断的调整逻辑倾向加权方法。
Stat Med. 2021 Oct 30;40(24):5237-5250. doi: 10.1002/sim.9122. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
5
A Systematic Review of Characteristics of Nonprobability Community Venue Samples of Sexual Minority Individuals and Associated Methods for Assessing Selection Bias.对性少数群体个体的非概率社区场所样本特征及其评估选择偏差的相关方法的系统评价。
LGBT Health. 2019 Jul;6(5):205-215. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2018.0241. Epub 2019 May 24.
6
Descriptive inference using large, unrepresentative nonprobability samples: An introduction for ecologists.使用大型、无代表性的非概率样本进行描述性推理:生态学家入门。
Ecology. 2024 Feb;105(2):e4214. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4214. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
7
Combining Probability and Nonprobability Samples by Using Multivariate Mass Imputation Approaches with Application to Biomedical Research.通过使用多变量多重插补方法结合概率样本和非概率样本及其在生物医学研究中的应用
Stats (Basel). 2023 Jun;6(2):617-625. doi: 10.3390/stats6020039. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
Enhancing estimation methods for integrating probability and nonprobability survey samples with machine-learning techniques. An application to a Survey on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain.利用机器学习技术增强概率抽样和非概率抽样的综合估计方法。在西班牙 COVID-19 大流行影响调查中的应用。
Biom J. 2023 Feb;65(2):e2200035. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200035. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
9
Nonprobability Web surveys to measure sexual behaviors and attitudes in the general population: a comparison with a probability sample interview survey.用于测量普通人群性行为和态度的非概率网络调查:与概率抽样访谈调查的比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 8;16(12):e276. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3382.
10
We need to talk about nonprobability samples.我们需要谈谈非概率样本。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2023 Jun;38(6):521-531. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Weighting Adjustment for Attrition in Longitudinal Trajectory Modeling: A Simulation Study.纵向轨迹建模中损耗加权调整的作用:一项模拟研究
Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2025;54(3):866-888. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2024.2362923. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
2
Analyzing Potential Non-Ignorable Selection Bias in an Off-Wave Mail Survey Implemented in a Long-Standing Panel Study.在一项长期进行的面板研究中实施的非高峰期邮件调查中分析潜在的不可忽视的选择偏差。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2024 Oct 23;13(1):100-127. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smae039. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Risk of Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage After Stroke: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan.

本文引用的文献

1
A simulation study of diagnostics for selection bias.选择偏倚诊断的模拟研究
J Off Stat. 2021 Sep;37(3):751-769. doi: 10.2478/jos-2021-0033. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
2
Measures of the Degree of Departure from Ignorable Sample Selection.偏离可忽略样本选择程度的度量
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Nov;8(5):932-964. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smz023. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
3
Indices of non-ignorable selection bias for proportions estimated from non-probability samples.从非概率样本估计比例时的不可忽略选择偏倚指标。
台湾一项全国性基于人群的队列研究:卒中后创伤性颅内出血的风险。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct;13(19):e035725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035725. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
4
Evaluating Pre-election Polling Estimates Using a New Measure of Non-ignorable Selection Bias.使用非可忽略选择偏差的新度量来评估选举前民意调查估计值。
Public Opin Q. 2023 Jun 8;87(Suppl 1):575-601. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfad018. eCollection 2023.
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2019 Nov;68(5):1465-1483. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12371. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
4
Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities.现行多基因风险评分的临床应用可能会加剧健康差异。
Nat Genet. 2019 Apr;51(4):584-591. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
5
New options for national population surveys: The implications of internet and smartphone coverage.全国人口调查的新选择:互联网和智能手机覆盖范围的影响
Soc Sci Res. 2018 Jul;73:221-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
The personal and clinical utility of polygenic risk scores.多基因风险评分的个体和临床效用。
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Sep;19(9):581-590. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0018-x.
7
Prospects for using risk scores in polygenic medicine.多基因医学中风险评分的应用前景。
Genome Med. 2017 Nov 13;9(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0489-y.
8
Genomewide association studies of suicide attempts in US soldiers.美国士兵自杀未遂的全基因组关联研究。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2017 Dec;174(8):786-797. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32594. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
9
Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment.全基因组关联研究确定了74个与受教育程度相关的基因座。
Nature. 2016 May 26;533(7604):539-42. doi: 10.1038/nature17671. Epub 2016 May 11.
10
Alternative indicators for the risk of non-response bias: a simulation study.无应答偏倚风险的替代指标:一项模拟研究。
Int Stat Rev. 2016 Apr;84(1):43-62. doi: 10.1111/insr.12100. Epub 2015 Mar 25.