Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, California, United States of America.
Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 3;17(3):e0264748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264748. eCollection 2022.
Most studies of abortion access have recruited participants from abortion clinics, thereby missing people for whom barriers to care were insurmountable. Consequently, research may underestimate the nature and scope of barriers that exist. We aimed to recruit participants who had considered, but failed to obtain, an abortion using three online platforms, and to evaluate the feasibility of collecting data on their abortion-seeking experiences in a multi-modal online study. In 2018, we recruited participants for this feasibility study from Facebook, Google Ads, and Reddit for an online survey about experiences seeking abortion care in the United States; we additionally conducted in-depth interviews among a subset of survey participants. We completed descriptive analyses of survey data, and thematic analyses of interview data. Recruitment results have been previously published. For the primary outcomes of this analysis, over one month, we succeeded in capturing data on abortion-seeking experiences from 66 individuals who were not currently pregnant and reported not having obtained an abortion, nor visited an abortion facility, despite feeling that abortion could have been the best option for a recent pregnancy. A subset of survey respondents (n = 14) completed in-depth interviews. Results highlighted multiple, reinforcing barriers to abortion care, including legal restrictions such as gestational limits and waiting periods that exacerbated financial and other burdens, logistical and informational barriers, as well as barriers to abortion care less frequently reported in the literature, such as a preference for medication abortion. These findings support the use of online recruitment to identify and survey an understudied population about their abortion-seeking experiences. Further, findings contribute to a more complete understanding of the full range of barriers to abortion care that people experience in the United States, and how these barriers intersect to not just delay, but to prevent people from obtaining abortion.
大多数关于堕胎机会的研究都是从堕胎诊所招募参与者,从而错过了那些认为堕胎难以逾越的人。因此,研究可能低估了存在的障碍的性质和范围。我们的目的是通过三个在线平台招募那些考虑过但未能获得堕胎的参与者,并评估在多模式在线研究中收集他们寻求堕胎经历数据的可行性。2018 年,我们从 Facebook、Google Ads 和 Reddit 招募参与者参加这项可行性研究,以进行一项关于在美国寻求堕胎护理经历的在线调查;我们还在调查参与者的一个子集中进行了深入访谈。我们完成了对调查数据的描述性分析,并对访谈数据进行了主题分析。之前已经发表了研究结果。对于本次分析的主要结果,在一个多月的时间里,我们成功地从 66 名目前没有怀孕且表示没有获得堕胎或访问过堕胎机构的个体那里获取了关于寻求堕胎经历的数据,尽管他们认为堕胎可能是最近一次怀孕的最佳选择。调查参与者的一个子集(n=14)完成了深入访谈。研究结果突出了多种强化的堕胎护理障碍,包括法律限制,如妊娠限制和等待期,这加剧了经济和其他负担,以及后勤和信息障碍,以及堕胎护理障碍,如对药物流产的偏好。这些发现支持使用在线招募来识别和调查一个研究不足的人群,了解他们的堕胎经历。此外,研究结果有助于更全面地了解美国人在堕胎护理方面所经历的各种障碍,以及这些障碍如何相互交织,不仅延迟,而且阻止人们获得堕胎。