• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

捕捉重要信息:更新 NICE 方法指南,以衡量和评估健康。

Capturing what matters: updating NICE methods guidance on measuring and valuing health.

机构信息

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK.

NHS England and NHS Improvement, Medicines Repurposing Program, London, UK.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):2167-2173. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03101-6. Epub 2022 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-022-03101-6
PMID:35247152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9188493/
Abstract

In July 2019, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) initiated a major review of its health technology evaluation methods to update its methods guide. This update has recently concluded with the publication of its health technology evaluation manual in January 2022. This paper reports the methods and findings of the review in relation to the recommended approach to use for the measurement and valuation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in submissions to NICE. Issues related to (i) the methods to use when NICE's preferred measure (EQ-5D) is not appropriate or not available; (ii) adjusting health state utility values over time to account for age; (iii) measuring and valuing HRQoL in children and young people; and (iv) including carers' QoL in economic evaluations were included in this review. This commentary summarises the methods used to undertake the review, its findings, and the changes to NICE methods that were proposed based on these findings. It also outlines topics where further research is needed before definitive methods guidance can be issued. The broad proposals described here were subject to a public consultation in 2020 and a further consultation on the updated methods guidance was completed in October 2021 before the publication of the manual in January 2022.

摘要

2019 年 7 月,英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)启动了对其卫生技术评估方法的重大审查,以更新其方法指南。最近,该指南的更新工作已经完成,并于 2022 年 1 月发布了《卫生技术评估手册》。本文报告了此次审查的方法和结果,涉及 NICE 建议用于提交评估的健康相关生命质量(HRQoL)测量和估值的方法。审查涉及到以下问题:(i) 在 NICE 首选测量方法(EQ-5D)不适用或不可用时使用何种方法;(ii) 随时间调整健康状态效用值以反映年龄变化;(iii) 在儿童和青少年中测量和估值 HRQoL;以及 (iv) 将照顾者的生命质量纳入经济评估。本评论总结了进行审查所使用的方法、发现结果以及基于这些发现对 NICE 方法提出的修改建议。它还概述了在发布明确的方法指南之前需要进一步研究的主题。这里描述的广泛建议在 2020 年进行了公众咨询,2021 年 10 月完成了对更新方法指南的进一步咨询,随后于 2022 年 1 月发布了《手册》。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a8/9188493/c6910ffbd87d/11136_2022_3101_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a8/9188493/c6910ffbd87d/11136_2022_3101_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a8/9188493/c6910ffbd87d/11136_2022_3101_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Capturing what matters: updating NICE methods guidance on measuring and valuing health.捕捉重要信息:更新 NICE 方法指南,以衡量和评估健康。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):2167-2173. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03101-6. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
2
A Review of the Methods Used to Generate Utility Values in NICE Technology Assessments for Children and Adolescents.《NICE 儿童和青少年技术评估中效用值生成方法的综述》
Value Health. 2020 Jul;23(7):907-917. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
Utility values in National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Technology Appraisals.在英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)技术评估中的效用值。
Value Health. 2011 Jan;14(1):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.015.
4
Does Methodological Guidance Produce Consistency? A Review of Methodological Consistency in Breast Cancer Utility Value Measurement in NICE Single Technology Appraisals.方法学指南能产生一致性吗?对英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所单一技术评估中乳腺癌效用值测量的方法学一致性的综述。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Jun;2(2):97-107. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0040-5.
5
The Evolving Nature of Health Technology Assessment: A Critical Appraisal of NICE's New Methods Manual.卫生技术评估的发展变化:对 NICE 新方法手册的批判性评价。
Value Health. 2023 Oct;26(10):1503-1509. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Inclusion of Carer Health-Related Quality of Life in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Appraisals.将照顾者健康相关生活质量纳入国家卫生与临床优化研究所评估。
Value Health. 2020 Oct;23(10):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
7
Including carer health-related quality of life in NICE health technology assessments in the United Kingdom.将护理人员与健康相关的生活质量纳入英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的卫生技术评估中。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2024 Oct 8:1-13. doi: 10.1017/S1744133124000124.
8
9
Health state utilities associated with caring for an individual with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).与照顾患有皮肤 T 细胞淋巴瘤(CTCL)个体相关的健康状态效用。
J Med Econ. 2020 Oct;23(10):1142-1150. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1793764. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The Psychometric Performance of Generic Preference-Based Measures in Informal Carers: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies.通用偏好性测量工具在非正式照料者中的心理测量性能:验证研究的系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01509-9.
2
Health-related quality of life and productivity burden for non-professional caregivers of adults with rare diseases: a real-world study.罕见病成年患者非专业照护者的健康相关生活质量和生产力负担:一项真实世界研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jun 6;20(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03796-z.
3
A Vignette Study to Derive Health-Related Quality-of-Life Weights for Individuals with Steroid Refractory Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Receiving Third-Line Therapy in the United Kingdom.

本文引用的文献

1
The Challenges of Measuring and Valuing Quality of Life in Preschool Children: A Retrospective Review of NICE Appraisals.测量和评估学龄前儿童生活质量的挑战:对英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所评估的回顾性研究
Children (Basel). 2021 Aug 31;8(9):765. doi: 10.3390/children8090765.
2
COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures.CONSORT 报告规范:用于评估患者报告结局测量工具测量属性的研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Aug;30(8):2197-2218. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
3
A Review of the Psychometric Performance of Selected Child and Adolescent Preference-Based Measures Used to Produce Utilities for Child and Adolescent Health.
一项关于在英国接受三线治疗的类固醇难治性慢性移植物抗宿主病患者的健康相关生活质量权重推导的病例对照研究。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 Feb 19;12(1):58-65. doi: 10.36469/001c.125546. eCollection 2025.
4
Health State Utility Values in Children and Adolescents with Disabilities: A Systematic Review.残疾儿童和青少年的健康状态效用值:一项系统综述。
J Pediatr Clin Pract. 2025 Jan 15;15:200139. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedcp.2025.200139. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Drivers of innovation value: simulation for new drug pricing evaluation based on system dynamics modelling.创新价值驱动因素:基于系统动力学建模的新药定价评估模拟
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 22;16:1474856. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1474856. eCollection 2025.
6
Utilities Associated with the Treatment of Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD): A Time Trade-off (TTO) Study in the UK and Canada.生长激素缺乏症(GHD)治疗相关效用:英国和加拿大的时间权衡(TTO)研究
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2025 Jan 10;16:9-21. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S479705. eCollection 2025.
7
A time trade-off study in the UK, Canada and the US to estimate utilities associated with the treatment of haemophilia.一项在英国、加拿大和美国进行的时间权衡研究,旨在估计与血友病治疗相关的效用。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Nov 13;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02311-5.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Three Different New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in the Randomised BIO-RESORT Trial at 3 Years.在随机化的BIO-RESORT试验中三种不同新一代药物洗脱支架3年的成本效益
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Jan;9(1):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00539-x. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
9
Fair Funding Decisions: Consistency of the Time Horizons Used in the Calculation of Quality-Adjusted Life Years for Therapies for Very Rare Diseases by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in England.公平的资金决策:英格兰国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)在计算极罕见病疗法的质量调整生命年(QALY)时,使用的时间范围的一致性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 13;21(5):616. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050616.
10
Understanding caregiver burden and quality of life in Kerala's primary palliative care program: a mixed methods study from caregivers and providers' perspectives.了解喀拉拉邦初级姑息治疗计划中照顾者的负担和生活质量:照顾者和提供者观点的混合方法研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 7;23(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02155-x.
关于用于生成儿童和青少年健康效用的选定儿童和青少年偏好为基础的测量工具的心理计量学性能的综述。
Value Health. 2021 Mar;24(3):443-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
4
A Review of the Methods Used to Generate Utility Values in NICE Technology Assessments for Children and Adolescents.《NICE 儿童和青少年技术评估中效用值生成方法的综述》
Value Health. 2020 Jul;23(7):907-917. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 May 7.
5
Identification, Review, and Use of Health State Utilities in Cost-Effectiveness Models: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report.健康状态效用值在成本效果模型中的识别、评价和应用:ISPOR 疗效研究实践报告
Value Health. 2019 Mar;22(3):267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.004.
6
The Inclusion of Spillover Effects in Economic Evaluations: Not an Optional Extra.经济评估中纳入溢出效应:并非可有可无。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Apr;37(4):451-456. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0730-6.
7
Measuring quality of life among people living with HIV: a systematic review of reviews.评估艾滋病毒感染者的生活质量:一项系统性综述的综述
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Nov 15;15(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0778-6.
8
What is the evidence for the performance of generic preference-based measures? A systematic overview of reviews.有哪些证据可以证明通用偏好为基础的衡量标准的表现?系统综述的综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 May;19(4):557-570. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0902-x. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
OMERACT Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALY) Working Group: Do Current QALY Measures Capture What Matters to Patients?OMERACT 健康调整生命年(QALY)工作组:当前的 QALY 衡量标准是否能反映患者关注的问题?
J Rheumatol. 2017 Dec;44(12):1899-1903. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.161112. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
10
Can The EQ-5D Detect Meaningful Change? A Systematic Review.EQ-5D能否检测出有意义的变化?一项系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Nov;33(11):1137-54. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0295-6.