Department for Mechanical and Process Engineering, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Offenburg, Germany.
Institute for Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sports Med. 2022 Aug;52(8):1863-1877. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01666-3. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
Running overuse injuries (ROIs) occur within a complex, partly injury-specific interplay between training loads and extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors. Biomechanical risk factors (BRFs) are related to the individual running style. While BRFs have been reviewed regarding general ROI risk, no systematic review has addressed BRFs for specific ROIs using a standardized methodology.
To identify and evaluate the evidence for the most relevant BRFs for ROIs determined during running and to suggest future research directions.
Systematic review considering prospective and retrospective studies. (PROSPERO_ID: 236,832).
PubMed. Connected Papers. The search was performed in February 2021.
English language. Studies on participants whose primary sport is running addressing the risk for the seven most common ROIs and at least one kinematic, kinetic (including pressure measurements), or electromyographic BRF. A BRF needed to be identified in at least one prospective or two independent retrospective studies. BRFs needed to be determined during running.
Sixty-six articles fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Levels of evidence for specific ROIs ranged from conflicting to moderate evidence. Running populations and methods applied varied considerably between studies. While some BRFs appeared for several ROIs, most BRFs were specific for a particular ROI. Most BRFs derived from lower-extremity joint kinematics and kinetics were located in the frontal and transverse planes of motion. Further, plantar pressure, vertical ground reaction force loading rate and free moment-related parameters were identified as kinetic BRFs.
This study offers a comprehensive overview of BRFs for the most common ROIs, which might serve as a starting point to develop ROI-specific risk profiles of individual runners. We identified limited evidence for most ROI-specific risk factors, highlighting the need for performing further high-quality studies in the future. However, consensus on data collection standards (including the quantification of workload and stress tolerance variables and the reporting of injuries) is warranted.
跑步过度使用损伤(ROI)是在训练负荷与外在和内在风险因素之间复杂的、部分特定于损伤的相互作用下发生的。生物力学风险因素(BRFs)与个体跑步方式有关。虽然 BRFs 已经在一般 ROI 风险方面进行了综述,但没有系统的综述使用标准化方法针对特定 ROI 的 BRFs 进行评估。
确定并评估与跑步过程中确定的 ROI 最相关的 BRFs 的证据,并提出未来的研究方向。
考虑前瞻性和回顾性研究的系统综述。(PROSPERO 编号:236,832)。
PubMed。Connected Papers。搜索于 2021 年 2 月进行。
英语。主要运动是跑步的参与者的研究,涉及七个最常见 ROI 的风险和至少一个运动学、动力学(包括压力测量)或肌电图 BRF。前瞻性研究或两个独立的回顾性研究中至少有一个确定了 BRF。BRF 需要在跑步过程中确定。
有 66 篇文章符合我们的入选标准。特定 ROI 的证据水平从矛盾到中度证据不等。研究之间的跑步人群和应用的方法差异很大。虽然一些 BRFs 出现在几个 ROI 中,但大多数 BRFs 是特定于特定 ROI 的。大多数源于下肢关节运动学和动力学的 BRFs 位于额状面和横断面上。此外,足底压力、垂直地面反作用力加载率和自由力矩相关参数被确定为动力学 BRFs。
本研究提供了最常见 ROI 的 BRFs 的综合概述,这可能为开发个体跑步者的 ROI 特定风险概况提供起点。我们发现大多数 ROI 特定风险因素的证据有限,这突出表明未来需要进行更多高质量的研究。然而,需要达成关于数据收集标准的共识(包括量化工作量和应激耐受力变量以及报告损伤)。