Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Brain Stimul. 2022 Mar-Apr;15(2):491-508. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.02.017. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
Electrical neuromodulation via direct electrical stimulation (DES) is an increasingly common therapy for a wide variety of neuropsychiatric diseases. Unfortunately, therapeutic efficacy is inconsistent, likely due to our limited understanding of the relationship between the massive stimulation parameter space and brain tissue responses.
To better understand how different parameters induce varied neural responses, we systematically examined single pulse-induced cortico-cortico evoked potentials (CCEP) as a function of stimulation amplitude, duration, brain region, and whether grey or white matter was stimulated.
We measured voltage peak amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) of intracranially recorded stimulation responses as a function of distance from the stimulation site, pulse width, current injected, location relative to grey and white matter, and brain region stimulated (N = 52, n = 719 stimulation sites).
Increasing stimulation pulse width increased responses near the stimulation location. Increasing stimulation amplitude (current) increased both evoked amplitudes and AUC nonlinearly. Locally (<15 mm), stimulation at the boundary between grey and white matter induced larger responses. In contrast, for distant sites (>15 mm), white matter stimulation consistently produced larger responses than stimulation in or near grey matter. The stimulation location-response curves followed different trends for cingulate, lateral frontal, and lateral temporal cortical stimulation.
These results demonstrate that a stronger local response may require stimulation in the grey-white boundary while stimulation in the white matter could be needed for network activation. Thus, stimulation parameters tailored for a specific anatomical-functional outcome may be key to advancing neuromodulatory therapy.
通过直接电刺激(DES)进行电神经调节是治疗各种神经精神疾病的一种越来越常见的疗法。不幸的是,治疗效果不一致,这可能是由于我们对大量刺激参数空间与脑组织反应之间的关系的理解有限。
为了更好地了解不同参数如何引起不同的神经反应,我们系统地检查了单脉冲诱导的皮质-皮质诱发电位(CCEP)作为刺激幅度、持续时间、脑区以及刺激是灰质还是白质的函数。
我们测量了颅内记录的刺激反应的电压峰值幅度和曲线下面积(AUC)作为距离刺激部位、脉冲宽度、注入电流、相对于灰质和白质的位置以及刺激脑区的函数(N=52,n=719 个刺激部位)。
增加刺激脉冲宽度会增加靠近刺激部位的反应。增加刺激幅度(电流)会使诱发幅度和 AUC 非线性增加。在局部(<15mm),灰质和白质交界处的刺激会引起更大的反应。相比之下,对于远距离部位(>15mm),白质刺激始终比灰质内或附近的刺激产生更大的反应。刺激部位-反应曲线随扣带回、外侧额和外侧颞皮质刺激的不同而呈现不同的趋势。
这些结果表明,更强的局部反应可能需要在灰质-白质边界进行刺激,而网络激活可能需要白质刺激。因此,针对特定解剖-功能结果定制的刺激参数可能是推进神经调节治疗的关键。