Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Devon Air Ambulance Trust, Exeter, UK.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Mar 5;30(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00989-w.
Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), particularly those associated with entrapment, are a common cause of major trauma. Current extrication methods are focused on spinal movement minimisation and mitigation, but for many patients self-extrication may be an appropriate alternative. Older drivers and passengers are increasingly injured in MVCs and may be at an increased risk of entrapment and its deleterious effects. The aim of this study is to describe the injuries, trapped status, outcomes, and potential for self-extrication for patients following an MVC across a range of age groups.
This is a retrospective study using the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database. Patients were included if they were admitted to an English hospital following an MVC from 2012 to 2019. Patients were excluded when their outcomes were not known or if they were secondary transfers. Simple descriptive analysis was used across the age groups: 16-59, 60-69, 70-79 and 80+ years. Logistic regression was performed to develop a model with known confounders, considering the odds of death by age group, and examining any interaction between age and trapped status with mortality.
70,027 patients met the inclusion criteria. Older patients were more likely to be trapped and to die following an MVC (p < 0.0001). Head, abdominal and limb injuries were more common in the young with thoracic and spinal injuries being more common in older patients (all p < 0.0001). No statistical difference was found between the age groups in relation to ability to self-extricate. After adjustment for confounders, the 80 + age group were more likely to die if they were trapped; adjusted OR trapped 30.2 (19.8-46), not trapped 24.2 (20.1-29.2).
Patients over the age of 80 are more likely to die when trapped following an MVC. Self-extrication should be considered the primary route of egress for patients of all ages unless it is clearly impracticable or unachievable. For those patients who cannot self-extricate, a minimally invasive extrication approach should be employed to minimise entrapment time.
机动车碰撞(MVC),特别是那些与被困有关的碰撞,是造成严重创伤的常见原因。目前的救援方法侧重于减少和缓解脊柱运动,但对于许多患者来说,自行脱困可能是一种合适的替代方法。老年人司机和乘客在 MVC 中受伤的情况越来越多,他们可能更容易被困并受到其有害影响。本研究的目的是描述在一系列年龄组中,MVC 后受伤、被困状态、结果和自行脱困的可能性。
这是一项使用创伤审核和研究网络(TARN)数据库的回顾性研究。纳入标准为 2012 年至 2019 年期间因 MVC 住院的患者。排除标准为结局未知或为二次转院的患者。使用简单描述性分析对年龄组进行分析:16-59 岁、60-69 岁、70-79 岁和 80 岁以上。使用逻辑回归建立了一个考虑年龄组死亡概率的已知混杂因素模型,并研究了年龄与被困状态与死亡率之间的任何相互作用。
符合纳入标准的患者有 70027 人。年龄较大的患者更有可能在 MVC 后被困并死亡(p<0.0001)。年轻人更容易出现头部、腹部和四肢受伤,而老年人更容易出现胸部和脊柱受伤(均 p<0.0001)。在自行脱困能力方面,不同年龄组之间没有统计学差异。在校正混杂因素后,如果被困,80 岁以上的患者更有可能死亡;调整后 OR 被困 30.2(19.8-46),未被困 24.2(20.1-29.2)。
年龄在 80 岁以上的患者在 MVC 后被困时更有可能死亡。除非明显不切实际或无法实现,否则应考虑所有年龄段的患者自行脱困为主要撤离途径。对于那些无法自行脱困的患者,应采用微创的救援方法,以尽量减少被困时间。