Department of Clinical Laboratory, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
J Infect Chemother. 2022 Jun;28(6):836-839. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.12.035. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
Although recent technological advances for the diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) provide rapid and accurate results, blood culture maintains a key role in the diagnosis of BSI. The objective of this study was to determine whether 24-h reporting by telephone to disclose the suspected microorganism based on the Gram stain morphology from positive blood cultures (first laboratory report) affects a physician's use of appropriate antimicrobials. A total of 627 (14%) out of 4413 blood samples, excluding duplicate samples from the same patient on the same day, were positive for blood cultures between January and December 2016. The contamination rate of blood cultures during the study period was 2.3%. Among 627 patients with positive blood cultures, 538 (86%) were receiving antibiotics at the time of the first laboratory report, of which 502 (80%) thereafter continued the same antimicrobials, and the remaining 36 (6%) were changed to appropriate antimicrobials after the first laboratory report. An additional 25 (4%) were newly administered appropriate antimicrobials after the first laboratory report, whereas an additional 21 (3%) were newly administered appropriate antimicrobials after infection control team (ICT)-intervention. The median time lag (interquartile ranges) from flagging culture bottles as positive to a physician's use of appropriate antimicrobials after the first laboratory report (4 h, 2-7) was significantly (p < 0.001) shorter than that after ICT-intervention (12 h, 10-17). During the study period, no cases of discrepancy between the Gram stain morphology in the first laboratory report and definitive identification of microorganisms in the final laboratory report were observed. Because the timing of flagging culture bottles as positive tends to fall outside normal working hours, immediate 24-h reporting by telephone to disclose the suspected microorganism based on the Gram stain morphology from positive blood cultures may contribute to an early recognition of bacteremia and the physician's use of appropriate antimicrobials.
尽管最近在诊断血流感染 (BSI) 方面的技术进步提供了快速而准确的结果,但血培养在 BSI 的诊断中仍起着关键作用。本研究的目的是确定根据阳性血培养(第一份实验室报告)革兰染色形态学通过电话 24 小时报告疑似微生物是否会影响医生使用适当的抗菌药物。2016 年 1 月至 12 月期间,排除同一天同一患者的重复样本后,4413 份血样中共有 627 份(14%)血培养阳性。研究期间血培养的污染率为 2.3%。在 627 例阳性血培养患者中,有 538 例(86%)在第一份实验室报告时正在接受抗生素治疗,其中 502 例(80%)此后继续使用相同的抗菌药物,其余 36 例(6%)在第一份实验室报告后改用适当的抗菌药物。另有 25 例(4%)在第一份实验室报告后新使用了适当的抗菌药物,另有 21 例(3%)在感染控制小组 (ICT) 干预后新使用了适当的抗菌药物。从标记培养瓶为阳性到第一份实验室报告后医生使用适当抗菌药物的中位数时间滞后(四分位间距)(4 h,2-7)明显(p < 0.001)短于 ICT 干预后(12 h,10-17)。在研究期间,第一份实验室报告中的革兰染色形态与最终实验室报告中微生物的明确鉴定之间没有观察到差异。由于标记培养瓶为阳性的时间往往在正常工作时间之外,因此根据阳性血培养的革兰染色形态学通过电话立即 24 小时报告疑似微生物可能有助于早期识别菌血症和医生使用适当的抗菌药物。