Suppr超能文献

使用四种营养成分模型评估巴西带有声明和营销技巧的包装食品的营养质量。

Evaluating nutrition quality of packaged foods carrying claims and marketing techniques in Brazil using four nutrient profile models.

作者信息

Pereira Rafaela Corrêa, Souza Carneiro João de Deus, de Angelis Pereira Michel Cardoso

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Science, Federal Institute of Minas Gerais, Bambuí, MG Brazil.

Department of Nutrition, Federal University of Lavras, PO box 3037, Lavras, MG 37200-900 Brazil.

出版信息

J Food Sci Technol. 2022 Apr;59(4):1520-1528. doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05162-w. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the nutrient profile of packaged foods marketed in Brazil, giving insights into healthiness of the Brazilian supermarket packaged food environment, considering different food categories and levels of industrial food processing and presence of nutrition and health claims and marketing strategies. A cross-sectional survey was conducted on the labels of pre-packed foods marketed in a home-shopping website. A stratified random sample (n = 335) was obtained to be analysed by four nutrient profile models: Food Standards Australia New Zealand's Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion, UK Nutrient Profile from the Food Standards Agency, Nutrient profile model from Pan American Health Organization, and Nutrition Score from Unilever Food & Health Research (Unilever). Overall, the models shown agreement, besides some differences in the levels of approval. Ultra-processed foods were less healthy. Pass rates for products carrying nutrition and/or health claims have evidenced the presence of these claims may be indicative of slightly better nutritional quality. This did not apply for products with and without marketing techniques. These findings highlight the need for improvement of the supermarket packaged food environment in scenarios like Brazil by increasing efforts to reformulate products to make them healthier, together with appropriate food labelling regulation.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在巴西销售的包装食品的营养成分,深入了解巴西超市包装食品环境的健康状况,同时考虑不同的食品类别、工业食品加工水平、营养与健康声明的存在情况以及营销策略。对一家家庭购物网站上销售的预包装食品标签进行了横断面调查。通过分层随机抽样(n = 335)获得样本,并采用四种营养成分模型进行分析:澳大利亚和新西兰食品标准局的营养成分评分标准、英国食品标准局的营养成分模型、泛美卫生组织的营养成分模型以及联合利华食品与健康研究部的营养评分(联合利华)。总体而言,除了在批准水平上存在一些差异外,这些模型显示出一致性。超加工食品的健康程度较低。带有营养和/或健康声明的产品的通过率表明,这些声明的存在可能意味着营养质量略好。这不适用于有无营销手段的产品。这些发现凸显了在巴西这样的情况下改善超市包装食品环境的必要性,即加大产品配方改革力度以使产品更健康,并同时实施适当的食品标签监管。

相似文献

1
Evaluating nutrition quality of packaged foods carrying claims and marketing techniques in Brazil using four nutrient profile models.
J Food Sci Technol. 2022 Apr;59(4):1520-1528. doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05162-w. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
2
Nutritional quality of packaged foods targeted at children in Brazil: which ones should be eligible to bear nutrient claims?
Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Jan;41(1):71-75. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.167. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
The nutritional quality of foods carrying health-related claims in Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, Slovenia and the United Kingdom.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;70(12):1388-1395. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.114. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
4
Nutrient profile of 23 596 packaged supermarket foods and non-alcoholic beverages in Australia and New Zealand.
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Feb;19(3):401-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000968. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
5
Regulating health claims on food labels using nutrient profiling: what will the proposed standard mean in the Australian supermarket?
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Dec;16(12):2154-61. doi: 10.1017/S136898001200540X. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
7
Comparison of the nutritional content of products, with and without nutrient claims, targeted at children in Brazil.
Br J Nutr. 2016 Jun;115(11):2047-56. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516001021. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
8
Nutritional Quality of Pre-Packaged Foods in China under Various Nutrient Profile Models.
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 29;14(13):2700. doi: 10.3390/nu14132700.

引用本文的文献

1
Eat More Healthily: Nutrition Quality and Nutrition Information of Foods.
Nutrients. 2025 Feb 6;17(3):590. doi: 10.3390/nu17030590.
2
Are Foods with Protein Claims Healthy? A Study of the Spanish Market.
Nutrients. 2024 Dec 11;16(24):4281. doi: 10.3390/nu16244281.
3
Evidence Gaps in Assessments of the Healthiness of Online Supermarkets Highlight the Need for New Monitoring Tools: a Systematic Review.
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2022 Apr;24(4):215-233. doi: 10.1007/s11883-022-01004-y. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

2
The food environment in Latin America: a systematic review with a focus on environments relevant to obesity and related chronic diseases.
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(18):3447-3464. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002891. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
3
Does message framing matter for promoting the use of nutritional warnings in decision making?
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Nov;22(16):3025-3034. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002507. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
4
Characterizing Ultra-Processed Foods by Energy Density, Nutrient Density, and Cost.
Front Nutr. 2019 May 28;6:70. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00070. eCollection 2019.
7
Comparison of nutrient profiling models for assessing the nutritional quality of foods: a validation study.
Br J Nutr. 2018 Sep;120(5):567-582. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518001575. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
9
The SENS algorithm-a new nutrient profiling system for food labelling in Europe.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Feb;72(2):236-248. doi: 10.1038/s41430-017-0017-6. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验