Suppr超能文献

在线超市健康评估中的证据差距凸显了新监测工具的需求:系统评价。

Evidence Gaps in Assessments of the Healthiness of Online Supermarkets Highlight the Need for New Monitoring Tools: a Systematic Review.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, 1 King St, Newtown, NSW, 2042, Australia.

Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, VIC, 3125, Australia.

出版信息

Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2022 Apr;24(4):215-233. doi: 10.1007/s11883-022-01004-y. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Online grocery shopping is increasingly popular, but the extent to which these food environments encourage healthy or unhealthy purchases is unclear. This review identifies studies assessing the healthiness of real-world online supermarkets and frameworks to support future efforts.

RECENT FINDINGS

A total of 18 studies were included and 17 assessed aspects of online supermarkets. Pricing and promotional strategies were commonly applied to unhealthy products, while nutrition labelling may not meet regulated requirements or support consumer decision-making. Few studies investigated the different and specific ways online supermarkets can influence consumers. One framework for comprehensively capturing the healthiness of online supermarkets was identified, particularly highlighting the various ways retailers can tailor the environment to target individuals. Comprehensive assessments of online supermarkets can identify the potential to support or undermine healthy choices and dietary patterns. Common, validated instruments to facilitate consistent analysis and comparison are needed, particularly to investigate the new opportunities the online setting offers to influence consumers.

摘要

目的综述

在线杂货购物越来越受欢迎,但这些食品环境在多大程度上鼓励健康或不健康的购买尚不清楚。本综述确定了评估真实在线超市健康程度的研究,并为未来的研究提供了框架。

最近的发现

共纳入 18 项研究,其中 17 项评估了在线超市的各个方面。定价和促销策略通常适用于不健康的产品,而营养标签可能不符合监管要求或支持消费者做出决策。很少有研究调查在线超市影响消费者的不同和具体方式。确定了一个全面捕捉在线超市健康程度的框架,特别强调了零售商可以通过各种方式调整环境以针对特定消费者的方式。对在线超市的全面评估可以确定其支持或破坏健康选择和饮食模式的潜力。需要共同的、经过验证的工具来促进一致的分析和比较,特别是为了研究在线环境为影响消费者提供的新机会。

相似文献

1
Evidence Gaps in Assessments of the Healthiness of Online Supermarkets Highlight the Need for New Monitoring Tools: a Systematic Review.
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2022 Apr;24(4):215-233. doi: 10.1007/s11883-022-01004-y. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
2
Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 27;2(2):CD009315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2.
3
Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review.
Obes Rev. 2023 Jan;24(1):e13525. doi: 10.1111/obr.13525. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
5
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Wood Waste Valorization and Classification Approaches: A systematic review.
Open Res Eur. 2025 May 6;5:5. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18862.1. eCollection 2025.
7
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
8
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
10
Nutritional portrait of processed foods purchased in Québec (Canada), 2016-2022.
Public Health Nutr. 2025 Apr 21;28(1):e79. doi: 10.1017/S1368980025000588.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating nutrition quality of packaged foods carrying claims and marketing techniques in Brazil using four nutrient profile models.
J Food Sci Technol. 2022 Apr;59(4):1520-1528. doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05162-w. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
2
Capturing the Healthfulness of the In-store Environments of United Kingdom Supermarket Stores Over 5 Months (January-May 2019).
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Oct;61(4):e171-e179. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
3
Consumer Food Environment Healthiness Score: Development, Validation, and Testing between Different Types of Food Retailers.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;18(7):3690. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073690.
4
Contributions of Food Environments to Dietary Quality and Cardiovascular Disease Risk.
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2021 Feb 17;23(4):14. doi: 10.1007/s11883-021-00912-9.
6
Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):2982-3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.
9
How Online Grocery Stores Support Consumer Nutrition Information Needs.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Oct;52(10):952-957. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.07.009.
10
The affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an Australian case study.
Nutr J. 2020 Sep 30;19(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00606-z.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验