Li Qi, Li Zhen, Han Xiaoxuan, Shen Xiao, Wang Fei, Bai Lipeng, Li Zhuo, Zhang Rui, Wang Yanlin, Zhu Xiaodong
Department of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 17;16:805953. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.805953. eCollection 2022.
The aim of our study is to explore the most reliable panel of plasma biomarkers for differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes (PDSs). We selected five kinds of neurodegenerative proteins in plasma: neurofilament light chain (NfL), α-synuclein (α-syn), total tau, β-amyloid 42 (Aβ42) and β-amyloid 40 (Aβ40), and investigated the diagnostic value of these biomarkers.
A total of 99 plasma samples from patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy, and age-matched healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled in our study. Plasma NfL, α-syn, total tau, Aβ42, and Aβ40 levels were quantified by ultrasensitive single molecule array immunoassay. We used logistic regression analyses to examine diagnostic accuracy of these plasma biomarkers. Disease severity was assessed by the modified Hoehn and Yahr staging scale, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and subsequently, correlation analysis was performed.
A combination of α-syn, Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ42/40, and NfL could achieve a best diagnostic value in differentiating PDSs from HC and PD from HC, with an AUC of 0.983 and 0.977, respectively. By adding NfL to measurements of α-syn or Aβ42 or Aβ40 or Aβ42/40, the best discriminating panel was formed in differentiating atypical parkinsonian disorder (APD) and HC, and the discriminatory potential could reach a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100% (AUC = 1.000). For further distinguishing PD from APD, we found a combination of NfL, Aβ42, and total tau was the most reliable panel with equally high diagnostic accuracy. With respect to differentiating the subtypes of APD from one another, our results revealed that measurement of NfL, total tau, Aβ42, Aβ40, and Aβ42/40 was the best discriminating panel. Correlation analysis suggests that plasma Aβ42 levels were positively correlated to UPDRS part III scores in MSA. In terms of cognitive function, there was a relationship between plasma Aβ42/40 level and MMSE scores in patients with APD.
In our study, various combinations of plasma biomarkers have great potentialities in identifying PDSs, with important clinical utility in improving diagnostic accuracy. Plasma NfL may have added value to a blood-based biomarker panel for differentiating PDSs.
本研究旨在探索用于帕金森综合征(PDS)鉴别诊断的最可靠血浆生物标志物组合。我们选取了血浆中的五种神经退行性蛋白:神经丝轻链(NfL)、α-突触核蛋白(α-syn)、总tau蛋白、β-淀粉样蛋白42(Aβ42)和β-淀粉样蛋白40(Aβ40),并研究了这些生物标志物的诊断价值。
本研究纳入了99份来自帕金森病(PD)、多系统萎缩(MSA)、进行性核上性麻痹患者以及年龄匹配的健康对照(HC)的血浆样本。通过超灵敏单分子阵列免疫测定法定量血浆中NfL、α-syn、总tau蛋白、Aβ42和Aβ40的水平。我们使用逻辑回归分析来检验这些血浆生物标志物的诊断准确性。采用改良的Hoehn和Yahr分期量表、统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分(UPDRS III)和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评估疾病严重程度,随后进行相关性分析。
α-syn、Aβ42、Aβ40、Aβ42/40和NfL的组合在区分PDS与HC以及PD与HC方面可实现最佳诊断价值,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.983和0.977。通过在α-syn或Aβ42或Aβ40或Aβ42/40的测量中加入NfL,形成了区分非典型帕金森病(APD)和HC的最佳鉴别组合,鉴别潜力可达100%的灵敏度和100%的特异性(AUC = 1.000)。为进一步区分PD与APD,我们发现NfL、Aβ42和总tau蛋白的组合是最可靠的组合,诊断准确性同样很高。关于区分APD的不同亚型,我们的结果显示测量NfL、总tau蛋白、Aβ42、Aβ40和Aβ42/40是最佳鉴别组合。相关性分析表明,MSA患者血浆Aβ42水平与UPDRS第三部分评分呈正相关。在认知功能方面,APD患者血浆Aβ42/40水平与MMSE评分之间存在关联。
在我们的研究中,血浆生物标志物的各种组合在识别PDS方面具有巨大潜力,对提高诊断准确性具有重要临床应用价值。血浆NfL可能为基于血液的生物标志物组合在区分PDS方面增加价值。