Pryor Christopher, Li Chang, Sergeeva Anastasia V, Pryor Iana S
Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Xiasha University Town, Hangzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 17;12:623847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623847. eCollection 2021.
Is flexibility or formality more useful for organizations that are pursuing improved performance? Organizational structure scholars offer opposing answers to this question, and empirical results have been mixed. Our study contributes to this research by describing a mediational model that links organizational flexibility to performance via opportunity exploitation. Specifically, we argue that flexible firms are able to exploit a greater number of opportunities, which, in turn, can improve performance. We also argue that the indirect effect of flexibility on performance via opportunity exploitation is stronger when top executives display higher affective commitment for their firms, meaning that they have a positive emotional attachment to their firms. Top executives with higher affective commitment can mitigate the downsides experienced by the staff of flexible firms, such as uncertainty and negative affect, which improves the outcomes of flexibility. Drawing on a sample of 211 firms and their founders, we find support for our hypotheses.
对于追求绩效提升的组织而言,灵活性或形式化哪个更有用?组织结构学者对这个问题给出了相反的答案,实证结果也参差不齐。我们的研究通过描述一个中介模型来推动这项研究,该模型将组织灵活性与通过机会利用实现的绩效联系起来。具体而言,我们认为灵活的公司能够利用更多的机会,进而可以提高绩效。我们还认为,当高管对其公司表现出更高的情感承诺时,即他们对公司有积极的情感依恋,灵活性通过机会利用对绩效的间接影响会更强。情感承诺较高的高管可以减轻灵活公司员工所经历的负面影响,如不确定性和负面情绪,这改善了灵活性的效果。基于对211家公司及其创始人的样本研究,我们的假设得到了支持。